Genital human papillomavirus dna based epidemiology
This presentation is the property of its rightful owner.
Sponsored Links
1 / 68

Genital Human Papillomavirus: DNA based Epidemiology PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 120 Views
  • Uploaded on
  • Presentation posted in: General

Genital Human Papillomavirus: DNA based Epidemiology. Anil K.Chaturvedi, D.V.M., M.P.H. Human Papillomavirus (HPV). Papillomaviridae Most common viral STD Double stranded DNA virus ~8 Kb Entire DNA sequence known. HPV genome. Classification of HPV types.

Download Presentation

Genital Human Papillomavirus: DNA based Epidemiology

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Presentation Transcript


Genital human papillomavirus dna based epidemiology

Genital Human Papillomavirus:DNA based Epidemiology

Anil K.Chaturvedi, D.V.M., M.P.H


Human papillomavirus hpv

Human Papillomavirus (HPV)

  • Papillomaviridae

  • Most common viral STD

  • Double stranded DNA virus ~8 Kb

  • Entire DNA sequence known


Hpv genome

HPV genome


Classification of hpv types

Classification of HPV types

  • Defined by <90% DNA sequence homology in L1, E6 and E7 genes

  • >100 recognized types, at least 40 infect genital tract

  • 90-98% homology- sub-types

  • <2% heterogeneity- intratype variants


Genital hpv histo pathology

Genital HPV- Histo-pathology

*Tyring SK, American journal of medicine, 1997


Hpv and cervical cancer

HPV and Cervical cancer

  • Second most common cancer worldwide

  • HPV is a “ necessary cause”: ~ 99.7% of cervical cancer cases

  • Support from several molecular and epidemiologic studies

  • Protein products of E6 and E7 genes oncogenic


Hpv molecular biology

HPV-molecular biology

Tindle RW, Nature Reviews, Cancer, Vol2: Jan2002


Hpv molecular biology1

HPV-molecular biology

Herald Zur Hausen, Nature Reviews, Cancer Volume 2:5; May; 2002.


Hpv oncogenic transformation

HPV- Oncogenic transformation


Hpv epidemiology

HPV-Epidemiology

Koutsky, LA, American Journal of Medicine, May 5, Vol 102, 1997.


Crude estimates of hpv impact in women 15 years

Crude estimates of HPV impact in women >15 years


Cervical cancer in us

Cervical cancer in US

SEER data and Statistics, CDC.


Diagnosis

Diagnosis

  • Pap smears- Current recommendations (US)

  • Normal on 3 consecutive annual- 3 year screening

  • Abnormal-no HPV- Annual

  • Abnormal- evidence of HPV- 6-12 months

  • LSIL/HSIL- colposcopy


Hpv diagnosis

HPV diagnosis

Clinical diagnosis:

Genital warts

Epithelial defects

See cellular changes caused by the virus:

Pap smear screening

Directly detect the virus:

DNA hybridization or PCR*

Detect previous infection:

Detection of antibody against HPV*

* Done in the Hagensee Laboratory


Utility of hpv screening

Utility of HPV screening

  • Primary prevention of CC

  • Secondary prevention

  • Component of Bethesda 2001 recommendations

  • Prevalent genotypes for vaccine design strategies


Natural history of cervical neoplasia

Natural history of Cervical neoplasia

Rates of progression

CIN I

CIN II

CIN III

5%

1%

12%

CC


Hpv cc epidemiologic considerations

HPV-CC: epidemiologic considerations

  • HPV is a “necessary cause”, not a “sufficient cause” for CC

  • Near perfect sensitivity P(T+/D+), very poor positive predictive value P(D+/T+)

  • Interplay of co-factors in progression


Genital human papillomavirus dna based epidemiology

  • Host genetic

  • P53 and

  • HLA polymorphisms

Herald Zur Hausen, Nature Reviews, Cancer Volume 2:5; May; 2002


Hiv vs hiv story

HIV+ vs. HIV- story

  • HIV+ men and women, 4-6 times greater risk of incident, prevalent and persistent HPV infections

  • Increased cytologic abnormalities and HPV associated lesions difficult to treat


Prevalence of 27 hpv genotypes in women with diverse profiles

Prevalence of 27 HPV genotypes in Women with Diverse Profiles

Anil K Chaturvedi1, Jeanne Dumestre2, Ann M. Gaffga2, Kristina M. Mire,2Rebecca A.Clark2, Patricia S.Braly3, Kathleen Dunlap3,Patricia J. Kissinger1, and Michael E. Hagensee2


Goals of study

Goals of study

  • Characterize prevalent HPV types in 3 risk settings-Low-risk HIV-, high-risk HIV- and HIV+ women

  • Characterize geotypes associated with cytologic abnormalities

  • Risk factor analyses


Methods

Methods

Low-risk clinic

N=68

High-risk clinic

N=376

HIV+

N=167

Cervical swabs and

Pap smears

N=611

36 LR (52.9%)

232 HR (61.7%)

95 HIV+ (56.8%)

Took screening

questionnaire

N=363


Methods1

Methods

  • Inclusion/ exclusion criteria:

  • >18 years

  • Non-pregnant

  • Non-menstruating

  • Chronic hepatic/ renal conditions

  • Informed consent


Methods2

Methods

  • HPV assessment:

    DNA from cervical swabsPolymerase chain reaction using PGMy09/11 consensus primer system reverse line hybridization (Roche molecular systems, CA)


Hpv genotyping

HPV genotyping

Roche molecular systems Inc., Alameda, CA.


Hpv classification

HPV classification

  • Strip detects 27 HPV types (18 high-risk, 9 low-risk types)

  • Types 6, 11, 40, 42, 53, 54, 57, 66, 84 : low-eisk

  • Types 16, 18, 26, 31, 33, 35, 39, 45, 51, 52, 55, 56, 58, 59, 68, 82, 83, 73: high-risk

  • Classified as Any HPV, HR, LR, and multiple (any combination)


Pap smears

Pap smears

  • Classified – 1994 Bethesda recommendations

  • Normal, ASCUS, SIL (LSIL and HSIL)


Data analysis

Data analysis

  • Bivariate analyses- Chi-squared or Fischer’s exact

  • Binary logistic regression for unadjusted and adjusted OR and 95% CI

  • Multinomial logistic regression for Pap smear comparisons (Normal, ASCUS and SIL)


Analysis

Analysis

  • Risk factor analysis for HPV infection- Any, HR, LR and multiple (dependent variables)

  • P<0.20 on bivariate and clinically relevant included in multivariate

  • All hypothesis two-sided, alpha 0.05

  • No corrections for multiple comparisons


Demographics of cohort

Demographics of cohort

  • HIV+ older than HIV-

    [34.51 (SD=9.08) vs. 26.72 (SD=8,93) ] p<0.05

  • Predominantly African American ~80%

  • HIV+ more likely to report history of STD infections, multiparity, smoking (ever) and # of sex partners in last year ( All P<0.05)

  • 16.8% of HIV+ immunosuppressed (CD4 counts

    < 200)

  • 54% Viral load >10,000 copies


Clinic comparisons

Clinic comparisons

*

*

*

*

* P for trend <0.001


Genotype prevalence high risk types

Genotype prevalence-high-risk types


Genotype prevalence low risk types

Genotype prevalence-low-risk types


Rank order by prevalence

Rank order by prevalence


Pap smear associations

Pap smear associations

  • Any HPV, high-risk HPV, low-risk HPV and multiple HPV with ASCUS and LSIL (p<0.01)

  • ASCUS- types 18, 35

  • LSIL: 16, 35, 51, 52, 68


Hiv sub set analyses n 167 multivariate

CD4 cell counts (<200 vs.>200)

HIV-RNA viral loads

Any HPV

6.41(0.77,52.8)

2.57(0.86, 7.64)

High-risk HPV

6.42(1.34,30.8)

1.59(0.64, 3.92)

Low-risk HPV

2.79(0.99, 7.89)

2.27(0.97, 5.29)

Multiple HPV

5.92(1.85,18.8)

1.10(0.46, 2.60)

Cytologic abnormalitiesb

4.21(1.28,13.7)

0.93(0.34, 2.58)

HIV+ sub-set analyses, N=167, multivariate


Risk factor analyses

Risk-factor analyses

  • Multivariate models: simultaneous adjustment for age, prior number of pregnancies, history of STD infections (self-reported), # of sex partners in previous year and HIV status

  • Any HPV: younger age (<25 years), and HIV+ status ( OR=6.31; 95%CI, 2.94-13.54)

  • High-risk HPV: Younger age (<25) and HIV+ status (OR= 5.30, 2.44-11.51)

  • Low-risk HPV: Only HIV status (OR=12.11, 4.04-36.26)


Conclusions

Conclusions

  • Increased prevalence of novel/uncharacterized genotypes (83 and 53) in HIV+

  • Pap smear associations on predicted patterns

  • CD4 counts edge viral loads out

  • No interaction between HPV and HIV- HPV equally oncogenic in HIV+ and HIV-

  • Differential risk factor profiles for infection with oncogenic and non-oncogenic types


Discussion

Discussion

  • Increased 83 and 53, also observed in HERS and WHIS reports

  • Probable reactivation of latent infection

  • 83 and 53 more susceptible to immune loss??- also found in renal transplant subjects


What puts hiv at greater risk

What puts HIV+ at greater risk?

Palefsky JM, Cancer epi Biomarkers and Prev, 1997.


Risk in hiv

Risk in HIV+

  • 1.Increased HPV infections ?

  • 2. Increased persistence ?

  • 3. Systemic immunosuppression- tumor surveillance

  • 4. Direct-HIV-HPV interactions?

  • 5.Increased multiple infections?


Study limitations

Study limitations

  • Cross-sectional study- no information on duration of HPV infections (big player!)

  • HIV- subjects predominantly high-risk- selection bias- bias to null

  • Genotypic associations based on small numbers

  • Multiple comparisons- increased Type I error-chance associations


Limitations

Limitations

  • Incomplete demographic information- no differences in rates of HPV infections

  • No associations in demographics- low power


Impact of multiple hpv infections compartmentalization of risk

Impact of Multiple HPV infections: Compartmentalization of risk

Anil K Chaturvedi1, Jeanne Dumestre2, Issac V.Snowhite, Joeli A. Brinkman,2Rebecca A.Clark2, Patricia S.Braly3, Kathleen Dunlap3,Patricia J. Kissinger1, and Michael E. Hagensee2


Background

Background

  • Multiple HPV infections- increased persistence

  • Persistent HPV infection-necessary for maintenance of malignant phenotype

  • Impact of multiple HPV infections- not well characterized


Goals

Goals

1.Characterize prevalence of multiple HPV infections in HIV+ and HIV- women

2. Does the risk of cytologic abnormalities differ by oncogenic-non-oncogenic combination categories

3. Compartmentalize impact of mutiple HPV infections in a multi-factorial scenario


Methods3

Methods

  • Cross-sectional study, non-probability convenience sample

1278 HIV-

women

264 HIV+

women

Cervical swabs

1542

women

989 women

Both HPV

and

Pap data available


Methods4

Methods

  • Exposure: HPV DNA status- polychotomous variable (no infection, single HPV type, HR-HR combinations, HR-LR combinations, mixed combinations)

  • Exposure assessment- reverse line probe hybridization


Methods5

Methods

  • Outcome: Pap smear status

  • Binary outcome: normal, abnormal (ASCUS and above)


Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis

  • Bivariate- Chi-squared, Fischer’s exact tests

  • Multivariate: Binary logistic regression, likelihood ratio improvement tests, goodness-of-fit tests (model diagnostics-best fit model)

  • Covariate Adjusted attributable fractions- from best fit logistic models


Adjusted attributable fractions

Adjusted attributable fractions

  • Unadjusted attributable fractions:

    AF= Pr (D)- Pr (Disease/ not exposed)

    Pr (Disease)

  • In a multi-factorial setting ??

  • Arrive at best-fir logistic regression model

  • Ln (P/1-P)= β0+β1x1+β2x2+β3x3…βnxn

  • Let y=β0+β1x1+β2x2+β3x3…βnxn


Adjusted attributable fractions1

Adjusted attributable fractions

  • Can derive predicted probability of outcome from logistic model

    P= ey

    1+ey

  • Get predicted probability for various exposure-covariate patterns from same regression model

  • Set reference levels and use original equation for estimates of adjusted attributable risks


Adjusted attributable fractions2

Adjusted attributable fractions

  • Cohort vs. cross-sectional situations- implications of exposure prevalences

  • Can derive SE and CI

  • Assumptions??

  • Interpretation??

  • Utility??


Results demographics

Results-Demographics

  • HIV+ older (35.08 (SD=8.56) vs. 32.24 (SD=12.19) P<0.01

  • Predominantly African American ~ 80%


Prevalence of hpv by hiv

Prevalence of HPV by HIV


Prevalence of multiple hpv

Prevalence of multiple HPV


Cytology results

Cytology results

P-for trend <0.001


Adjusted models

Adjusted models

  • Adjusted for age, and HIV status, compared to subjects with single HPV types-

    Multiple high-risk types- (OR=2.08, 1.11-3.89) and LR-HR combinations ( 2.40, 1.28-4.52) risk of cytologic abnormalities

  • Multiple infections linear predictor- adjusted for age and HIV, per unit increase in number (OR=1.85, 1.59, 2.15)


Adjusted attributable fractions3

Adjusted attributable fractions

  • Possible models- Main exposure multiple infections-No, single, multiple (Dummy variables)

    Co-variates: HIV: yes, no&Age : <25 years and >=25 years

  • Intercept, HIV+, age <25

  • Intercept, single HPV (D1), HIV+, age

    < 25

    3. Intercept, HIV-, Single HPV (D1), Multiple HPV (D2) and age < 25

    4. Intercept, D1, D2, HIV+, age <25


Genital human papillomavirus dna based epidemiology

AAR

  • 2 vs. 1: single HPV

  • 4 vs. 2: multiple

  • 4 vs. 3: HIV status


Genital human papillomavirus dna based epidemiology

AAR

*Appropriately adjusted based on comparison models


Conclusions1

Conclusions

  • Increased multiple infections in HIV+ women

  • HR-HR and HR-LR-HR combinations increase risk of abnormalities compared to single

  • Substantial proportion of risk reduced by removal of multiple HPV infections


Discussion1

Discussion

  • Reasons for increased risk?

  • Do multiple HPV types infect same cell??-Enhanced oncogene products- increased transformation

  • Does risk change by combinations of oncogenic categories-biologic interactions- enhanced immunogenicity??

  • Any particular genotype combinations??


Discussion2

Discussion

  • Cervical cancer-AIDS defining illness- proportion of risk potentially decreased-0.7%??????- Selection bias- majority of HIV- from colposcopy clinics

  • Are HIV+ women subject to survival bias?- survivors cope with infections better

  • Screening bias- convenience sample-underestimates or overestimates


Other epidemiologic issues

Other epidemiologic issues

  • Selection bias- Risk match or do not risk match HIV- women

  • If we do match, can we make claims regarding genotypic prevalences?

  • Information bias: are HPV risk categories correct, if not- non-differential misclassification

  • Using cytology vs. histology- Non-differential misclassification


Future prospects

Future prospects

  • Will HPV vaccines work??


Future plans

Future plans

Graduate!!!!!


Genital human papillomavirus dna based epidemiology

Acknowledgements

Dr.Hagensee and Dr.Kissinger (Mentors), Dr.Myer’s

Hagensee Laboratory : Basic

Isaac SnowhiteJoeli BrinkmanJennifer Cameron

Melanie Palmisano Anil ChaturvediPaula Inserra

Ansley HammonsTimothy Spencer

Clinical:

Tracy BeckelLiisa OakesJanine Halama

Karen LenzcykKatherine LohmanRachel Hanisch

Andreas Tietz

LSUHSC:

David Martin Kathleen DunlapPatricia Braly

Meg O’BrienRebecca Clark Jeanne Dumestre

Paul Fidel


  • Login