1 / 9

Europe's social divisions – gender and generational inequality in the service-based economy

Europe's social divisions – gender and generational inequality in the service-based economy. Patrick Diamond, Equality & Human Rights Commission. Debates about economic inequality in Europe confuse three separate questions:. Income poverty Income mobility Income inequality

arabella
Download Presentation

Europe's social divisions – gender and generational inequality in the service-based economy

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Europe's social divisions – gender and generational inequality in the service-based economy Patrick Diamond, Equality & Human Rights Commission

  2. Debates about economic inequality in Europe confuse three separate questions: • Income poverty • Income mobility • Income inequality Transfixed by threat of globalisation. Often blind to new gender and generational inequities.

  3. Today two major socio-economic challenges are transforming Europe: • Demographic - new gender relationships; women's increased aspiration for personal independence; the ageing workforce; rising migration • Post-industrial - knowledge-based economy within a framework of increased economic internationalisation & liberalisation

  4. Is it all about globalisation? • Yes - some loss of low skilled jobs, some delocalisation, some outsourcing • No - internally-driven pressures, new inequities run within as much as between classes

  5. Emergence of new social risks - Europe is ill-equipped to respond due to outdated welfare & social model that does not address: • Challenge of reconciling work & care • Obsolescence of professional skills • Relationship breakdown & family instability • Accentuation of dependency • Marginalisation & actual exclusion

  6. Risk of social polarisation: increasing poverty & income inequality; declining social mobility; higher levels of child poverty: • Growth of single parents families (4.4% of all EU households) - a third at risk of poverty: 18 million of the EU's 94 million children at risk of poverty • Youth unemployment double general unemployment (over 20% in France, Italy, Spain) • Cities attracting 'creative class' prosper - but old industrial towns decline • Rising dependency - among 55-64 yr olds 40% of men & 60% of women have dropped out of the labour market • Job growth concentrated in knowledge-intensive sectors: EU15 - 6% overall but 24% in KBE: two-thirds of new jobs high-skilled

  7. Social polarisation creates fear of new cultural divisions: • Asylum-seekers and migrants blamed for abusing welfare - yet discrimination & educational under-achievement rife • Alienated traditional white working-class • Impact of pervasive commercialisation, including on childhood • Hedonic treadmill of consumption hits poorest - obesity, alcoholism, mental illness

  8. In summary, need new forms of redistribution - of risk as well as income: • Promote dynamic equality to combat child poverty: tackle social inheritance by shifting resources from university education to early years and primary education • Re-write contract between generations: work-life policies, paternal leave incentives, tax deductions, employability; but also greater focus on over 80s to ensure more equitable 'end of life' • Tackle 'insider/outsider' cleavages: status quo benefit systems penalise women, young people, minorities e.g. pensions, atypical jobs • Make taxes fairer: in global economy where productivity gains advantage capital and penalise labour, fiscal burden falls disproportionately on lowest paid

  9. Conclusion • Address mismatch between work & welfare: aim - gender equal dual earning societies: realise women's contribution to productivity & social cohesion • Fairer distribution of burdens between generations • New approaches to integration: social & economic inclusion

More Related