1 / 20

Analysis and Implementation of the Guitar Amplifier Tone Stack

Analysis and Implementation of the Guitar Amplifier Tone Stack. David Yeh, Julius Smith dtyeh,jos@ccrma.stanford.edu CCRMA Stanford University Stanford, CA. Digital audio effects that emulate analog equipment are popular. “Modeling” amplifiers

Download Presentation

Analysis and Implementation of the Guitar Amplifier Tone Stack

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Analysis and Implementation of the Guitar Amplifier Tone Stack David Yeh, Julius Smith dtyeh,jos@ccrma.stanford.edu CCRMA Stanford University Stanford, CA

  2. Digital audio effects that emulate analog equipment are popular • “Modeling” amplifiers • Products by Line 6, Yamaha, Roland, Korg, Universal Audio, etc. • CAPS open source LADSPA suite • http://quitte.de/dsp/caps.html • Emulate behavior of classic analog gear in software • As close to real thing as possible • For portability and flexibility

  3. Guitar amp tone stack is a unique component in the sound of an amplifier • Almost every guitar amplifier, solid state or tube, has a tone control circuit – referred to as a tone stack • Passive RC filter to audio signal • Located either directly after preamp stage or after stages of gain and buffer

  4. Prior work • Modeled by Line 6 (and others) • Analyzed by Kuehnel (2005, book) • Typically approximated as a bank of biquads for Low, Mid, High frequency bands

  5. Parameter mapping from tone controls to frequency response is very complicated • Passive RC circuit • Three real poles • One zero at DC, one pair of zeros with anti-resonance • Circuit components are not isolated • Component values are comparable • Bridge topology • Tone controls affect location of multiple poles and zeros

  6. Tone Stack Transfer Function • Third order continuous time system • Complex mapping from component values/parameters to coefficients

  7. Poles depend only on Bass and Mid controls

  8. Zeros depend on all parameters

  9. Poles sweeping Bass and Mid Low freq Pole 1 Pole 2 Pole 3 High freq

  10. Zeros plots for parameter sweeps

  11. Digitization as third-order filter • Straightforward approach • Find continuous time transfer function • Discretize by bilinear transform • Implement as transposed Direct Form II (DFII) • Pros: Perfect mapping of tone controls to frequency response within limitations of bilinear transform • Cons: Complicated formulas to compute coefficients

  12. Bilinear transformation of 3rd order system

  13. LADSPA plugin block diagram Audio in Component values R, C Treble Compute DF coefs B[] Transposed DFII core A[] Mid Bass Audio out

  14. DFII frequency response shows good match with continuous time version

  15. Error relative to continuous time • Worst case errors shown • B=1, M=0, T=0 • Discrete time reaches low pass asymptote but continuous time does not

  16. Reduced sampling rate • Commercial effects pedals commonly run at 31 kHz • Guitar amplifier system is bandlimited by speaker response: 100–6000 Hz. • For f_s = 20 kHz, error increases but only at high frequencies due to asymptotic limits

  17. Table lookup implementation simplifies computation of coefficients • Tabulate 25 steps of each tone control parameter = 515 kB table • Lattice filter implementation for robustness to roundoff error in coefficients and to smoothly fade between coefficients as tone controls are varied • Convert from z-domain transfer function to lattice coefficients by step-down algorithm

  18. Tone stack parameter mapping is very complicated but not computationally complex • Implemented DFII and lattice filter in CAPS audio suite. Both run in real time. • Minimal processor load (<1%) on 2.2 GHz Intel P4 • Did not notice zipper noise – coefficient fade not necessary • Complicated mapping – simple order system • Third order filter is not computationally demanding • Direct implementation is practical

  19. Sound samples • White noise at different settings • Original white noise (2 sec) • B=0 M=0 T=0 • B=0 M=1 T=0 • B=1 M=0 T=1 • B=1 M=1 T=0 • B=1 M=1 T=1 • B=0.5 M=1 T=0.5

  20. Comparison of implementations

More Related