1 / 18

MINISTERIO DE FOMENTO

SECRETARÍA DE ESTADO DE INFRAESTRUCTURAS Y PLANIFICACIÓN. MINISTERIO DE FOMENTO. DIRECCIÓN GENERAL DE PLANIFICACIÓN Y COORDINACIÓN TERRITORIAL. CENTRO DE ESTUDIOS Y EXPERIMENTACIÓN DE OBRAS PÚBLICAS. Encuentro: “ Transporte urbano”. National Mobility Plan and Urban Transport.

apu
Download Presentation

MINISTERIO DE FOMENTO

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. SECRETARÍA DE ESTADO DE INFRAESTRUCTURAS Y PLANIFICACIÓN MINISTERIO DE FOMENTO DIRECCIÓN GENERAL DE PLANIFICACIÓN Y COORDINACIÓN TERRITORIAL CENTRO DE ESTUDIOS Y EXPERIMENTACIÓN DE OBRAS PÚBLICAS Encuentro: “Transporte urbano” National Mobility Plan and Urban Transport Barbara Swart Ministry of Transport, Public Works and Water Management of The Netherlands Passenger Transport Department Madrid, 18 de noviembre de 2004

  2. National Mobility Plan and Urban Transport Encuentro “Transporte urbano” Plan Estratégico de Infraestructuras y Transporte (PEIT) Madrid 18 November 2004 Barbara Swart Ministry of Transport, Public Works and Water Management of The Netherlands Passenger Transport Department

  3. Figures and Facts • Population 16.2 mio • 16,040 mile2 • 1000 inh./mile2 • living in Randstad:- 40% (6.5 mio)- 2600/mile2 • GDP/head (2002): - € 27,000 (EU: € 21,000)

  4. The Netherlands in Europe • Modal split (2003):trips km • car 49 % 79,5% • PT 4,5% 11,5% • bike 26 % 8 % • Other 20,5% 1 % • Passenger transport expected to grow till 2020 with about 20%!

  5. “Decentralised unitary state” Tiers of local government • 12 Provinces- transport policy, spatial planning, economic development - owner of provincial networks (road, rail, waterways) • 7 Urban “Metropolitan” Regions - economic, transport and spatial policy, but no jurisdiction road, rail and waterways • 489 Municipalities- water supply, traffic and transport, housing, schools, social services, health, sport, culture- owner of municipal networks (road, rail, waterways) • Funding comes mostly from central government

  6. Lessons learned from the past • Look for the right authority for policy implementation • Match role – responsibility - discretionary powers - funding of government tiers • Make adequate legislative framework • Organise accounting properly

  7. Decentralisation of transport policy: a step-by-step process • First: Traffic safety • Then: Public Transport (including new PT Act)And: Funds for smaller infrastructure projects and mobility/demand management • Now: transition to decentralising funds for larger infrastructure projects and PT subsidies • And in the mean time:Strengthen the knowledge infrastructure Based on local and regional needs

  8. Vision on Public Management • Business-like approach, beneficial to economic growth • Decentralisation if possible, centralisation if necessary, use joint international (EU) action if possible • More public-private partnerships • Flexibility in planning: no blueprint for 2020

  9. Legislative Framework:Transport Planning Act • Establishes planning hierarchy • Requires strategic transport plans from provinces/urban regions, in compliance with National Mobility Plan • Requires compliance of municipal policy with provincial/regional strategic plan • National plan should be result of agreement between all tiers of govt. (“bottom-up”) • Requires monitoring (input from provinces /regions/municipalities within national monitoring system)

  10. National Mobility Plan:New Strategic Transport Plan 2004-2020 • “Realistic ambitions” • Mobility to be accommodated, but not unrestricted; no moralisation about mode choice • Priorities national networks: • Guarantee reliablity road and rail (maintenance!) • Better organisation between networks (national/provincial/local) • Optimise capacity utilisation road and rail • Selective road capacity expansion

  11. National Mobility Plan: (2) • Organising regional accessibility: area-wise and user oriented approach from door to door instead of from network operator to network operator • Clear division of responsibilities • Quantitative targets remain for traffic safety and environment • Road Pricing: Not before 2010 (except possibly trucks), creation of support in society first

  12. National vision on Urban Transport • Area-wise approach • Involve all relevant partners (government, transport operators, private sector, NGO’s, users) • Do not focus on responsibilities, but on the problem and how to tackle it • Foster co-operation • Use demand management if necessary • Step-by-step, start with what’s feasible

  13. Challenges • Horizontal cooperation vs. Vertical planning hierarchy • Decentralised funding needs funds to provide an incentive! • Developing the adequate ‘common’ monitoring system in co-operation with regional/local government

  14. Demand/mobility management • Policy mix, aiming at a better quality of alternative modes of transport: e.g. better information, publicity and promotions, fiscal measures, regulatory measures • Conditions for success: - encouraging innovation and making mobility management more attractive - commitment from management of businesses and local authorities - partnerships, incl. cooperation with transport and service providers - local champions

  15. Amsterdam Experience Problem that Amsterdam faced: • Historical innercity with very limited parking space • Continuing growing car use and ownership • Growing amount of visitors Integrated Policy package: • Preference of Public Transport before Car use • High quality and fine infra network management • Focus on target groups, accessibility for • Businesses, short visits and inhabitants • Policy package of • Parking, Public Transport, Cycling and Car use

  16. Amsterdam Experience Parking policy Paid parking Price differentiation per residential area (permits) Strong enforcement Infrastructure Fine (close to home) and frequent PT network Smart cycling network Sufficient Parking houses and signalisation Lesson learned: Take profit of existing urban PT networks!

  17. European Platform on Mobility Management • Platform on which national, regional and local authorities, reseachers, transport and service providers and companies exchange knowledge, experiences and best practices in the field of demand/mobility management • Four partners • France, Sweden, Switzerland, The Netherlands

  18. European Platform on Mobility Management • invites Spain (like all other European countries) to join EPOMM and use the available knowledge and best practices in Europe for the Plan Estratégico de Infraestructuras y Transporte (PEIT) • please contact the EPOMM Secretariat, Square de Meeûs 18, Brussels, tel: + 3225520875, email: info@epomm.org, website: www.epomm.org

More Related