1 / 29

Web 2.0 and Beyond

Web 2.0 and Beyond. Marshall Breeding Director for Innovative Technologies and Research Vanderbilt University http://staffweb.library.vanderbilt.edu/breeding. Special Seminar for Library Development Program 2007 May 21, 2007 Chiang Mai. Evolution and advancement.

annona
Download Presentation

Web 2.0 and Beyond

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Web 2.0 and Beyond Marshall Breeding Director for Innovative Technologies and Research Vanderbilt University http://staffweb.library.vanderbilt.edu/breeding Special Seminar for Library Development Program 2007 May 21, 2007 Chiang Mai

  2. Evolution and advancement • We live in a time of much change: • Technology • Society • Generational shifts • Boomer > gen X > Millennials

  3. Heightened User Expectations • Library users come with expectations set by their experiences of the Web • Conventions for navigating and exploring Web-based resources well established • Dealing with large and complex bodies of information nothing new to incoming library users. • Sophisticated Web skills • Low tolerance for clunky and ineffective Web sites • Confident in their ability – reluctant to ask for help

  4. Problems with the Status Quo • A look and feel that may not meet the expectations of the current generation of Web-savvy users. • The conventional library environment requires users to interact with many different interfaces, and search many different resources. • Overly complex • Not always intuitive • Users have to go to different places to find different kinds of information on a given topic: Library OPAC for books, Article and E-journal locators for articles.

  5. An urgent need • Baby boomers and Gen X’rs are happier with traditional forms of content and existing modes of service • Millennials will move on to non-library provided information sources and services if not readily satisfied • There is a lot at stake for the future of libraries in adapting to generational transitions. • Web 2.0 provides a metaphor and model for adapting library services to today’s Web-savvy users.

  6. Web 1.0 • Static Web • Information silos • One-way communication

  7. Web 2.0 • Coined by O’Rielly Media in 2004 • Web + Social Computing • Dynamic Content • Highly interactive • Collaborative • Focus on the user • Focus on communities

  8. Web 2.0 examples • RSS delivery of content • Blogs – Web logs + comments • Wikis – content created in community • Voice over IP – Skype • Podcasting • vlogs

  9. Web 2.0 supporting technologies • Web services • XML APIs • AJAX (asynchronous JavaScript and XML) • Microformats • OpenSearch vs SRU/SRW

  10. Web 2.0 media • Rich media – beyond text • Music and audio • Well experienced: File swapping, p2p, iPod, MP3 • Video • Recreational and academic: youtube.com, myspace.com/video, yahoo! Video, bittorrent • Opportunities to remix. Usually recreational, but explore ways to tap this interest with an academic slant.

  11. The sprit of Web 2.0 • YouTube • Facebook • MySpace • Flickr

  12. Web 3.0 • Web 2.0 + artificial intelligence • Semantic Web • Web 2.0 + enterprise computing

  13. Library 2.0 • First mentioned by Michael Casey • Web 2.0 + Library = Library 2.0 • Apply Web 2.0 concepts to library applications

  14. Examples • Library Blogs • New book lists through RSS • Wikis • Intranets for staff documentation • Collaborative resources for library users • Enriched library catalogs • User participation in library resources • User tagging in catalog • Reviews • Ratings

  15. Evolution • The Web has been evolving since its very beginning • Web 2.0 didn’t happen all at once • Many of the concepts behind Web 2.0 trace back to its inception • Eg: Amazon embraced user participation, open API’s, etc long before Web 2.0 brand. • Evolution and maturation of Web technologies continues

  16. Caveats • Apply when appropriate • Not a plateau • Evolution continues • Web 2.0 can create isolated silos of information • Must evolve into an organized fabric of interrelated Web services. • Too many dead blogs and wikis already

  17. Web 2.0 a good start • A more social and collaborative approach • Web Tools and technology that foster collaboration • Blogs, wiki, blogs, tagging, social bookmarking, user rating, user reviews

  18. Interface expectations • Increasingly library users are well acclimated to current Web technologies and like it. • Used to relevancy ranking • The “good stuff” should be listed first • Users tend not to delve deep into a result list • Good relevancy requires a sophisticated approach, including objective matching criteria supplemented by popularity and relatedness factors.

  19. Interface expectations (cont…) • Very rapid response. Users have a low tolerance for slow systems • Rich visual information: book jacket images, rating scores, etc. • Let users drill down through the result set incrementally narrowing the field • Faceted Browsing • Drill-down vs up-front Boolean or “Advanced Search” • gives the users clues about the number of hits in each sub topic. • Navigational Bread crumbs • Ratings and rankings

  20. Library OPAC 1.0 • Feature rich, but complex • Advanced Boolean Search • Textual displays • Results in alphabetical or catalog key order • Slow, cumbersome • Focused on the physical inventory

  21. The best Library OPAC?

  22. Change underway • Widespread dissatisfaction with most of the current OPACs. Many efforts toward next-generation catalogs and interfaces. • Movement among libraries to break out of the current mold of library catalogs and offer new interfaces better suited to the expectations of library users. • Decoupling of the front-end interface from the back-end library automation system.

  23. Working toward next generation library interfaces • Redefinition of the library catalog • More comprehensive information discovery environments • Better information delivery tools • More powerful search capabilities • More elegant presentation

  24. Redefinition of library catalogs • Traditional notions of the library catalog are being questioned • It’s no longer enough to provide a catalog limited to print resources • Digital resources cannot be an afterthought • Forcing users to use different interfaces depending on type of content becoming less tenable • Libraries working toward consolidated search environments that give equal footing to digital and print resources

  25. Library OPAC 2.0 • Satisfying to the Web-savvy user • Faceted browsing – drill-down model of search • Graphical displays – cover art images • Enriched content – TOC, summaries • User tagging, folksonomies, ratings, reviews • Federated search as a separate service

  26. Library OPAC 3.0 • Comprehensive search environment: • Digital on equal footing with print • Federated search as an integrated service: access to full-text of subscribed content • Beyond MARC metadata: Dublin Core XML, Onix, etc: full-text searching • Searching “inside the book” • Fully integrated with other community and campus resources • ILS fully integrated with other information and business systems

  27. Collections evolving • E-journals, e-books (we’re doing that already) • Podcasts of lectures • video libraries of stock footage • News archives • Data sets: census, GIS

  28. Moving beyond… • Web 2.0 is already a 3-year-old model • Keep focus on strategic use of technology

  29. Challenges and Opportunities abound • An exciting time for libraries • Web 2.0 fuels new excitement for modernizing library services and supporting technologies • Opportunities presented by explosive growth of digital content. • Hard work is required to draw the new generation to library content and services without breaking what works well for those from previous generations.

More Related