1 / 17

What is EoRPA?

New Policy Frameworks, New Policy Approaches Recent regional policy developments in Europe Douglas Yuill Presentation at Ministry of Regional Development, Warsaw, 8 December 2008. What is EoRPA?. EoRPA is the Gaelic word for Europe

annice
Download Presentation

What is EoRPA?

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. New Policy Frameworks, New Policy Approaches Recent regional policy developments in EuropeDouglas YuillPresentation at Ministry of Regional Development, Warsaw, 8 December 2008

  2. What is EoRPA? • EoRPA is the Gaelic word for Europe • It is also the acronym for the European Regional Policy Research Consortium run by EPRC at the University of Strathclyde, Glasgow • EoRPA funds comparative EPRC research into regional policy developments in all EU countries (and Norway) • The consortium consists of regional policy departments from 10 countries: Austria, Finland, France, Germany, Italy, Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Sweden, United Kingdom.

  3. What is EoRPA? • EPRC produces five major reports for EoRPA each year and also disseminates the results of the research: • An overview of policy change across Europe (EoRPA Paper 08/1) • Policy change: a country-by-country review (EoRPA Paper 08/2) • Regional policy and EU State aid control (EoRPA Paper 08/3) • Regional policy and EU Cohesion policy (EoRPA Paper 08/4) • Territorial cohesion and cooperation (EoRPA Paper 08/5) • This presentation focuses on national regional policy developments.

  4. Purpose of presentation • Period of significant policy change: new EU policy frameworks and period of domestic policy review • Aim to chart the main changes taking place – by country and theme, identifying broad trends and country groupings • Aim to address the issue of why particular changes have been taking place

  5. Definition and scope of regional policy • Cohesion policy major importance : regional policy largely synonymous with Cohesion policy: programme-based, all-region, thematic & regional elements, growth-oriented – PL, NMS, GR, PO, SP, IT (2000-06). • Narrow (top-down, aid-based, investment-oriented, aid-area-targeted) andbroad policy (regional impact of sectoral policies, coordination) – (DE), SW, FI, NO • Regional policy low-key: small countries, limited problems – NE, IR, LU, BE, AU • Policy important, coordination key: FR – coordination via DIACT; GE – regional GA (coordination); UK – productivity-oriented, devolved; IT(2007-13) unitary

  6. Nature and perception of the regional problem • Limited disparities, limited intervention – AU, DE, LU, NE • Differentiated problems, calling for fine-tuned regional responses (also sub-regionally) – BE, FR, IR, UK • Problems of sparse population/remoteness, but also growth components to policy – FI, SW, NO • Severe regional differences (macro-regions) – GE, IT • Significant internal disparities, but national development key – GR, PO, SP • Marked internal disparities (capitals vs periphery), but also major gap with the rest of the EU – PL, rest of NMS

  7. Changing policy response: the degree of policy change Countries with major recent developments • Denmark: new policy approach from 2007 – reform of local government, new Business Development Act, new programme-based policymaking. • Netherlands: Peaks in the Delta White Paper implemented. Geographic policymaking. Regional strengths targeted in line with national priorities. • Italy: New unitary regional policy based on 2007-13 NSD and related OPs. Utilises EU and domestic budgets within EU-based programming regime but with domestic targets. Funding challenges.

  8. Changing policy response: the degree of policy change Countries with important domestic changes • Sweden: Renamed regional growth policy – stronger focus on developing growth potential in the regions and regional competitiveness. • Finland: Regional Development Act revisions. Coordination role of Regional Councils strengthened. Revised policy objectives for new government. • Germany: 2006 federalism reform – regional GA retained. Annual Framework Plan to multi-annual Coordination Framework. New regional aid map. Investment Allowance continued but phased out by 2013.

  9. Changing policy response: the degree of policy change Countries with interesting new developments • France: New generation of State-region project contracts, new SF programmes. PAT changes, new aid map, major-project focus. New competitiveness poles. Policy goals maintained but stress on sustainability • UK: 2007 Sub-National Review in England: productivity focus plus decentralised delivery. 2008 consultation on delivery: aim for sustainable growth at every level. Support measures rationalised, new aid map.

  10. Changing policy response: the degree of policy change Countries impacted by Cohesion policy developments • Poland: High policy profile. 2007-13 programming framework created a coherent and strategic approach. Debates forward-looking, introspective: focus on internal growth, growth centres. Coordination issues. • Significant changes also in Greece, Portugal, Spain, including focus on improved governance • Austria: NSRF development brought active collaboration, ‘STRATH.AT plus’ process. Land strategies reviewed. New regional aid map, young entrepreneurs scheme.

  11. Changing policy response: the degree of policy change Limited changes • Norway: Relatively low-key change – taking forward 2006 White Paper. But: new maps and reintroduced social security concession • Belgium: New regional aid laws in Flanders & Wallonia; federal elections cast doubt on institutional set-up. • Ireland: Domestically-funded National Development Plan; regional gateways • Luxembourg: No change. New regional aid legislation pending.

  12. Changing regional policyobjectives Main developments: • Strong move towards the promotion of growth and competitiveness: Examples: Netherlands, Sweden, France, Belgium, Poland, other NMS, Portugal • Some recent developments have equity elements: Denmark, Greece, Norway • Other objectives include stronger territorial structures (e.g. Nordic countries, Ireland), sustainable development (e.g. Belgium, France), better governance

  13. Factors underpinning policyobjectives • Growth and competitiveness: broader growth imperatives (including Lisbon agenda); endogenous growth; utilising regional potential; link between regional growth and territorial balance • Equity: constitutional commitments; broader commitment to equity/nature of the regional problem; core aspect of regional policy (funding allocations) • Maintaining territorial structures: uniform service provision; viable structures; spatial planning priorities • Sustainable development – sustainability agenda

  14. Changing spatial orientationof regional policy Main developments: • Significant aspects of policy have an all-region focus: Austria; Denmark; Finland; France; Germany, Greece, Ireland; Italy; Netherlands; Sweden; UK; Poland; Norway • However, regional aid maps target designated areas: significant cutbacks in coverage for 2007-13 • Also, funding flows favour weaker regions e.g. Denmark; Germany; Italy; Netherlands; Sweden; Poland; plus regional aid in Norway, Finland; Obj. 1 focus in Spain. • Specific area targeting: urban, rural, mountains, islands

  15. Changing regional incentives Main developments: • New aid maps: much reduced coverage but more flexible system: difficulties in Italy; reserve in France • New aid maxima: much lower for large firms (cut in half over the past 10 years). • Changed regional aids (RAG-related): SSC in Norway; new business support in Austria, Norway • Aid simplification: Finland, France, Portugal, Scotland • Important domestic developments: Investment Allowance to be phased out (Germany); new tax aids & more targeted support (Italy)

  16. Changing business environmentsupport • Move towards wider business environment support – reflects EU frameworks & domestic regional programmes • Infrastructure focus in Convergence countries/regions; accessibility also stressed in Nordic area, Netherlands. • Business infrastructure: central to Danish approach; industrial estates review in Netherlands, Flanders; business infrastructure important under Cohesion policy. • Innovation-oriented changes: Denmark; Finland; France; Germany; Ireland; Italy; Portugal, Spain; Poland; Norway • Advice/support changes: Austria; Ireland; Italy; Sweden; UK; improved admin capacity in Cohesion countries.

  17. Summary Summary of the main developments: • Overall level of change has been considerable. • In part, reflects the new EU frameworks: Cohesion policy pivotal in Poland and other NMS, as well as Greece, Portugal and Spain, and has also impacted elsewhere. New RAG has changed maps, ceilings & instruments. • Also domestic drivers of change: regional reform (Den); Peaks approach (Neths); unitary regional policy (Italy); regional growth policy (Swe); Regional Development Act revised (Fin); reaffirmed GA (Ger); new NDP (Ire); integrated strategies (Eng); new State contracts (Fra). Globalisation pressures, regional potential, innovation.

More Related