1 / 11

The Employment Cells

The Employment Cells. MISEP Meeting – Stockholm 7 October 2009 Tom Bevers, FPS Employment, Labour and Social Dialogue Belgium. Background. Traditional approach to entreprise restructurings : massive use of early retirement Possible from the age of 50, if agreed by the Minister

anika
Download Presentation

The Employment Cells

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. The Employment Cells MISEP Meeting – Stockholm 7 October 2009 Tom Bevers, FPS Employment, Labour and Social DialogueBelgium

  2. Background • Traditional approach to entreprise restructurings : massive use of early retirement • Possible from the age of 50, if agreed by the Minister • Generous system : UB + employer paid complement of at least 50% of the difference between UB and net wage (up to a limit) • No obligation to be available for the labour market • Until 65 (obliged to remain in the system until pension age) • 2005 Generations Pact : active ageing • Make early retirement less attractive • Invest in active measures instead of passive UB payments • As part of a broader set of measures

  3. New approach since 2006 • In case of collective dismissals (10% of workers) : no early retirement before 58 unless an employment cell is created • Objective : to guide, train and find a new job for the redundant workers • Obligatory passage for all redundant workers over 45 (risk loosing entitlement to early retirement or even to UB) • Voluntary for other workers • Duration : 6 months • No dismissals possible outside of the procedure

  4. In practice • The cell is created by the employer • Other participants : trade unions, industry-based training centers… • Leading role (in general) : PES • Employer has to submit a plan to the regional and federal minister

  5. Status of the participants • Redundant workers continue to receive their wage (even when entitled to less as severance pay) as an “integration allowance” • Workers have all obligations of UB recipients (availability, accept suitable job offers…) • Integration allowance can be kept when a new job is found • Workers that went through the cell are eligible for temporary SSC reductions : • Employer’s SSC for the new employer • Employee’s SSC for themselves

  6. Changes in 2009 (crisis) • Employment cells for ALL collective dismissals, even when no early retirement • Redundant workers ALL go through the cell • Under 45 : 3 months with at least 30h of outplacement • Over 45 : 6 months with at least 60h of outplacement • Also for temporary workers, agency workers… • Exception (as before) : workers over 58 years of age or 38 years of seniority

  7. Regional competence • Each regional PES coordinates its own cells • Coordination by sub-region • Cooperation when workers from different regions are involved (24 cases until now)

  8. Results

  9. Volkswagen Brussels • Volkswagen factory in Forest (Brussels) restructured in early 2007 (to become Audi Brussels) • First and most important case (before the crisis) where a cell was set up • All 3 regions involved • Brussels coordinated the cell • 3.000 workers involved • 1,810 from Flanders • 1,309 from Wallonia • 190 from Brussels • 1 year of outplacement (> legal obligation) • After 1 year : 1,712 in a new job, 207 still in training

  10. Critical assessment • Big step forward for changing attitudes towards restructurings • Good cooperation between actors • Results look good, but hard to evaluate • Complex legislation, practical complexities • “Waiting room” for early retirement ? • Reason to avoid collective dismissals (and fire workers one by one) ? • “Discrimination” of SME workers ?

More Related