1 / 42

AJCC 6 TH EDITION STAGING OF BREAST CARCINOMA.

AJCC 6 TH EDITION STAGING OF BREAST CARCINOMA. AJCC NODE STAGING -16 CATEGORIES . pNX – 1 option pN0 – 5 options; null,(i-),(i+),(mol-),(mol+) pN1 – 4 options; mi,a,b,c pN2 -- 3 options; a,b,c pN3 – 3 options; a,b,c. 5 YR SURVIVAL OF 20,547 WOMEN WITH RESPECT TO LYMPH NODE INVOLVEMENT

angus
Download Presentation

AJCC 6 TH EDITION STAGING OF BREAST CARCINOMA.

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. AJCC 6TH EDITION STAGING OF BREAST CARCINOMA.

  2. AJCC NODE STAGING -16 CATEGORIES • pNX – 1 option • pN0 – 5 options; null,(i-),(i+),(mol-),(mol+) • pN1 – 4 options; mi,a,b,c • pN2 -- 3 options; a,b,c • pN3 – 3 options; a,b,c

  3. 5 YR SURVIVAL OF 20,547 WOMEN WITH RESPECT TO LYMPH NODE INVOLVEMENT Cancer 45:2917-2924, 1980.

  4. N0 N1 N2 N3 0 1-3 4-9 >10

  5. MORE THAN JUST AXILLA • 1 - LOW AXILLARY • 2 - MID AXILLARY • 3 - HIGH AXILLARY (INFRACLAVICULAR) • 4 - SUPRACLAVICULAR • 5 - INTERNAL MAMMARY • 6 – LOW CERVICAL 6

  6. NEGATIVE NODE STAGING • pNX – status unknown • pN0 – H&E “negative” for carcinoma • pN0 (i+ or i-) – H&E “negative” and IPOX stains ordered • pN0 (mol+ or mol) – H&E “negative” and RT-PCR ordered “NEGATIVE” = Isolated tumor cells = pN0

  7. DEFINITION –ISOLATED TUMOR CELLS (ITC) • Single tumor cells or small clusters of tumor cells which do notaggregate to greater than 0.2 mm andwhich show no evidence of “proliferation or stromal reaction” • Clinical significance unknown • (i+) and (i-) • (mol+) and (mol-)

  8. ISOLATED TUMOR CELLS • pN0(i+) and pN0(mol +) and pN0 (H&E pos for ITC) are not counted as positive nodes eg 0.8 cm tumor with 12 nodes of which 3 “positive by IPOX” only pT1b pN0 pMX Thus “positive” by IPOX but not by N code.

  9. LOW NODE STAGE • pN1a 1-3 nodes positive In zones 1 and 2

  10. DEFINITION OF CLINICALLY APPARENT • Detected by imaging studies (excluding lymphoscintigraphy) • Detected by physical exam Note: No mention of matting of nodes though physical exam detection could represent matting.

  11. Pathologist’s Decision Tree

  12. LOW NODE STAGE • pN1b not clinically apparent but microscopically detected met

  13. LOW NODE STAGE • pN1c 1-3 axillary nodes pos & internal mam. Nodes pos. but not clinically apparent

  14. INTERMEDIATE NODE STAGE pN2a 4-9 axillary nodes pos. with at least one node met > 2 mm

  15. INTERMEDIATE NODE STAGE • pN2b clinical apparent int. mammary node, no positive axillary nodes

  16. HIGH STAGE NODE STAGING • pN3a Two categories of pN3a - axillary only displayed to the left

  17. HIGH STAGE NODE STAGING • pN3a Infraclavicular nodes positive -Second type of pN3a displayed to the left

  18. HIGH STAGE NODE STAGING • pN3b • Category One - metastasis in clinically apparent Int mammary node plus 1 or more axillary nodes

  19. HIGH STAGE NODE STAGING • pN3b • Second type - 3 or more axillary nodes + with int. mam. node positive by microscopy only

  20. HIGH STAGE NODE STAGING • pN3c Ipsilateral supra- clavicular node met.

  21. WHAT NODE FINDINGS NO LONGER CHANGE STAGING? • MACROSCOPIC - MATTING OF NODES • MICROSCOPIC – EXTRACAPSULAR EXTENSION OF TUMOR Both of the above are no longer included in the MSP approved synoptic report format.

  22. SENTINEL NODE CLASSIFICATION • Sentinel node without accompanying axillary dissection: (sn) e.g. – pN1 (sn); pN0 (i+) (sn) • Sentinel node with accompanying axillary dissection: e.g.– pN1; pN0 (i+)

  23. AGGREGATE WITHIN A NODE? • Node has no mass greater than 0.2 mm but has multiple masses. What’s the N code? • Node has no mass > 0.2 but < 2.0 mm but has multiple masses. What’s the N code. I don’t know the answer but it doesn’t happen very often.

  24. AGGREGATE OR NOT TO AGGREGATE, THAT IS THE ? • Each tumor nodule is 0.15 mm. • Each is < 0.2 mm • When aggregated the sum is 0.45 cm pN0 or pN1mic ?

  25. INTERNAL MAMMARY NODES • pN1b - IMN by sentinel node biopsy - mic + by path but notclinically apparent • pN1c – 1-3 + axillary nodes plus IMN mic + by path • pN2b – clinically apparent IMN with neg. axillary nodes • pN3b – IMN clinically apparent with any + axillary nodes

  26. INFRA AND SUPRACLAVICULAR LYMPH NODES • pN3a – infraclavicular node positive or >10 axillary nodes with one met > 2 mm • pN3c – ipsilateral supraclavicular node positive

  27. GRADING OF TUMORS • GX – CANNOT BE ASSESSED • G1 – LOW COMBINED HISTOLOGIC GRADE (FAVORABLE) • G2 – INTERMEDIATE COMBINED HISTOLOGIC GRADE (MODERATELY FAVORABLE) • G3 – HIGH COMBINED HISTOLOGIC GRADE (UNFAVORABLE)

  28. GRADING SYSTEMS IN USE • Scarff-Bloom-Richardson -1,2,3 • Nottingham ( Elston-Ellis modification of the Scarff-Bloom-Richardson ) – 3 to 9 - based on 1,831 pts - prognosis correlation p < 0.0001 - can be applied to most histologic tumor variants (e.g. - not medullary ca)

  29. CAP AND AJCC RECOMMEDED METHOD FOR TUMOR GRADING • Nottingham Combined Histologic Score - Tubule Formation (1,2 or 3) - Nuclear Pleomorphism (1,2,or 3) - Mitotic Count (1,2, or 3) Sum T + N + M = Combined Score Score 3-5 = grade 1 Score 6-7 = grade 2 Score 8-9 = grade 3

  30. TUMOR STAGING 18 CATEGORIES – CLINICAL AND PATHOLOGY STAGING THE SAME pTX (eg – gross tumor at margin of resection) pT0 no tumor pTis (DCIS, LCIS, Paget’s) pT1 (a,b,c) 0.1 cm to 2.0 cm pT2 > 2.0 < 5.0 cm pT3 >5.0 cm pT4 (a,b,c,d) chest wall or skin spread

  31. What about invasion < 0.1cm? • Termed microinvasion. • No T category reserved. • Lumped under pT1 as pT1mic • Number and size of microinvasive sites should be listed by recommendation of AJCC

  32. WHAT ABOUT COMBINED INSITU AND INVASIVE LESIONS? • The staging is by size of only the invasive component. e.g. – 2.5 cm macroscopic tumor mass shows 60% DCIS. Staging is not pT2 (>2 cm) but pT1b or pT1c (0.5 to 2.0 cm).

  33. WHAT ABOUT NEOADJAVANT PRESURGERY CHEMOTHERAPY? • All TNM in such case should be preceded by the prefix “y” e.g. – ypT1a

  34. WHAT ABOUT S/P NEEDLE CORE BIOPSIED LESIONS? • MEASURE RESIDUAL TUMOR • AGGREGATE MEASUREMENT FROM PREVIOUS CORE AND PRESENT LUMPECTOMY / MASTECTOMY e.g. – mammatome biopsy of 0.7 cm and lumpectomy of 0.8 = 1.5 cm or pT1b (if the mammatome biopsy is from the center of the breast mass then aggregating may not be appropriate).

  35. WHAT ABOUT SYNCHRONOUS LESIONS? • Largest mass’ measurement provides T • Smaller tumor does not get assigned a T • Lesions in the same quadrant are not considered synchronous lesions but are “satellite breast nodules” (no change in T) • Synchronous bilateral lesions are staged separately.

  36. METASTATIC STAGING • pMX - unknown • pM0 – no known mets • pM1 – distant mets low cervical nodes pectoralis muscle invasion distant organs malignant effusions (supraclavicular nodes no longer > M1)

  37. WHAT IS THE PATHOLOGIST’S RESPONSIBILITY? • Use a template that has all the required data fields. • Complete the TNM staging at the time of report signing. • Use all available resources, reports, history to accurately provide the TNM staging.

More Related