1 / 19

Reaching the Poor in Kenya through the Private Sector: Assessment of a network model for expanding access to reproducti

Reaching the Poor in Kenya through the Private Sector: Assessment of a network model for expanding access to reproductive health services. Dominic Montagu, MPH, MBA, DrPH – UC San Francisco Martha Campbell, PhD – School of Public Health, UC Berkeley

andrew
Download Presentation

Reaching the Poor in Kenya through the Private Sector: Assessment of a network model for expanding access to reproducti

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Reaching the Poor in Kenyathrough the Private Sector:Assessment of a network model for expanding access to reproductive health services Dominic Montagu, MPH, MBA, DrPH – UC San Francisco Martha Campbell, PhD – School of Public Health, UC Berkeley Julia Walsh, MD, MSc – School of Public Health, UC Berkeley Solomon Orero, MD – K-MET, Nairobi and Kisumu, Kenya

  2. Intervention being assessed Network of 225 health service providers – • 60 private practice • 150 government • 15 NGO and mission Organized by the nonprofit organization K-MET (originally the Kisumu Medical and Education Trust) Goal: Reduce maternal mortality by expanding access to family planning, post-abortion care, and safe early abortion services.

  3. Rationale for K-MET network • Kenya’s rural population (80% of total) has limited access to government health services. • Private, for-profit health services already exist, already self-sufficient. In rural areas, these providers are primarily mid-level practitioners. • Doctors tolerate the mid-level providers in rural areas.

  4. Rationale… • “…the main difference between the more and less poor in health is not in the likelihood of being ill but in the access to adequate treatment once ill.” D. Gwatkin, The Lancet commentary, Feb., 4 2003 • For maternal mortality: Some critical RH services not available in public services – rural or urban • WHO-World Bank meeting in Addis Ababa, February 2002, on human resources challenges for health systems – “The health system is more than the Government’s health services”

  5. The research question Is it possible to expand access to reproductive health services through a network of private sector, for-profit providers without exacerbating inequity?

  6. Methodology • Survey data from 102 members of K-MET network and 50 non-member health providers • Exit interviews with female clients of both groups of providers • 212 household interviews to provide baseline information about the local community • Assess the relationship between wealth and the use of member or non-member providers

  7. Weighted asset ownership scores as a proxy measure of wealth • Data were collected on water, sanitation, fuel sources, home building materials, and appliances. • These variables are compiled to calculate a weighted asset ownership score for each participant as a proxy measure of household wealth. • Comparison of wealth distribution and other socioeconomic factors between clients of K-MET members, clients of non-members, and the general community.

  8. Summary Asset Scores – urban/rural

  9. Regression of asset ownership among clients and households

  10. Wealth score graphs, urban and rural Member clients Non-member clients Households

  11. Wealth score graphs - rural only Member clients Non-member clients Households

  12. Limitations of the study • Small sample size • Definitions of “rural” vary considerably, local definitions – vs. peri-urban • Low reported reproductive health (RH) volume led to survey of all patients, not just RH.

  13. Conclusions • The experience of this network is that those served are middle-income clients of the communities served. Targeting the poor will therefore mean recruiting providers in poor areas. (K-MET is now recruiting mid-level providers.) • Networking existing private, for-profit providers can expand access to reproductive health services without exacerbating inequity.

  14. Policy implications The network (franchises) of private providers, if organized by an NGO, can be empowered to provide essential services. • Are financially self-sustaining • Do not need to be under government payrolls • Should be recognized by governments as a de-facto and valuable part of their “health system”

  15. What is required? They need: • Organization by an in-country NGO • They need training (include in government’s own in-service training); low cost loans for equipment; supplies. • Tight regulation by government health systems characterized by human resource shortages will not be possible – Regulate through professional associations. Enabling mode

  16. Largest equity gap in public health Deaths per 100,000 abortions • Alan Guttmacher Institute. Sharing Responsibility: Women, Society and Abortion Worldwide. 1999

  17. Worldwide there is a lifetime average of about one abortion per woman AGI. Sharing Responsibility: Women, Society and Abortion Worldwide. 1999

  18. Portion of maternal deaths due to unsafe abortion • One quarter of maternal deaths are abortion deaths, and “up to half of maternal mortality in Africa” is abortion related. Andrzej Kulczycki. The Abortion Debate in the World Arena. 1999 (Mexico, Poland, Kenya) • 21% of maternal deaths in Latin America are abortion related. AGI quoting Sing and Sedge 1997, Int’l FP Perspectives 23, 4-14 • 13% of 585,000 maternal deaths are abortion related(WHO, 1995 estimates)

  19. The health policy challenge K-MET was established to reduce maternal mortality. Achieving Millennium Development Goals for reduced maternal mortality requires reducing the largest inequity in public health between rich and poor. Impact on the health, education and well-being of entire families.

More Related