E N D
1. Legal Memo Writing Factors in
Excellent Work
2. 2
3. 3 Content v. Style You cannot divorce content from style
Content must be complete, accurate and clear
Overall theme is readability
Focus is on the reader
Dense, difficult-to-read prose will detract from what otherwise may be a strong legal point
4. 4 Substantive Content of Memo:Results of Research… Results of research – case law
Leading cases
Currency, judicial interpretation, court level
Analogous cases
Why am I including this case in my memo?
5. 5 Results of research:Legislation and policy Current legislation
Acts and Regulations
Judicial interpretation
Policy
As found in precedent cases – consider whether accepted by the court or not
Found elsewhere? Cases on a related issue? Academic writing? Law reform?
6. 6 Substantive Content – Analysis of Law Accurate analysis of cases
Understands the law; accurate interpretation
Through analysis - Pays attention to detail
Does this decision alter the legal principle or test?
Is the principle or test limited to particular factual circumstances?
Which court is this decision from?
What is the date of the decision?
What is the ‘strength’ of the judgment? Is it a majority, concurring, or dissenting judgment?
7. 7 Key Elements – Substantive Content Objective reporting of law
Does the case really say this – or is this what you want it to say? Save the latter interpretation for argument.
Synthesize the law
As a package, what do these cases say?
Demonstrates ability to write an accurate, complete and clear summary of the law
8. 8 ELEMENTS OF STYLE: Factorsto consider in describing the law Audience
Purpose and Goals
Overall Structure of Memo
Presentation
Choice of Language
Apportioning word count
9. 9 Audience matters… Does this person have legal training?
What does this person know about this particular area of law? (Don’t make assumptions.)
10. 10 Why am I writing this memo? To give advice to a client on likely outcome of case should it proceed to trial
To assist lawyer in preparing for trial, both in gathering and presenting evidence and making legal argument
11. 11 What is the goal of this memo? To provide a clear, thorough, accurate, and objective statement of the law on the issues identified
To provide an objective prediction of the likely outcome of the case should it proceed to trial
12. 12 Structure of memo – 8 Components Introduction
Facts
Issue(s)
Brief Answer(s)
Analysis of Law (cases, legislation)
Synthesis of Law
Apply Law to Your Client’s Fact Situation
Conclusion
13. 13 Components of Memo Introduction
who is your client and what is this about?
Facts
limited by relevance
Inclusive (if you refer to elsewhere in memo, fact should be included in your facts section!)
14. 14 State the Issues
Consider: what do I need to prove or disprove in order to assess my client’s chances of success if this case goes to trial? What is this case really all about?
Are sub-issues required?
Does the use of sub-issues HELP or HINDER the analysis?
15. 15 Components of a memo… Brief answer(s)
Does your brief answer directly and briefly answer each issue?
Analysis
Would a short introduction help orient the reader to this area of law?
16. 16 Analysis of the law… Analyse the law issue by issue
provide an overview of the law, a synthesis and an application to facts for each issue - then move to the next issue and repeat the process
Consider whether extensive use of sub-issues helps or hinders this
Consider whether use of sub-headings is appropriate
17. 17 Analysis of cases… Order of presentation of cases?
Chronological?
Leading cases first, followed by supplementary cases?
General principles then analogous facts?
Content?
Facts, issues, holding (outcome), principles
Which order should be used?
Ask: why am I including this case?
18. 18 Use transitions… It is up to you, not your reader, to do the work!
Use transitions to explain to your reader how one case relates to the next
The leading case is …
The concept of intention was clarified in …
19. 19 Synthesize the law… Weave the cases together into a summary of the law
Use your synthesis as a checklist when applying law to facts
Pay attention to differences between cases
Consider and identify geographic jurisdiction and court level where relevant
Identify majority vs dissenting opinions
20. 20 Apply Law to Facts… Thorough and well-organized application of law to facts
Logical sequence?
Does application to facts follow the same sequence as your synthesis?
internal consistency enhances readability
Does application touch all of the points raised in your synthesis? It should!
21. 21 Application to facts…
Anticipate and address the counter-arguments
Evaluate the strength and weakness of the counter-arguments
mention the bad news
Conclusions are for the judge – illustrate how you got there!
22. 22 Writing Style and Presentation Logically Organized
Clearly expressed
Point first writing
Overall presentation
White Space
Headings
Page numbers
Footnotes
23. 23 Clarity Clear writing is essential
Pay attention to paragraph and sentence structure, wordiness
Be consistent in use of terminology
24. 24 Tighten up your writing… Avoid needless words and phrases
Instead of “in the event that”, use “if”
Instead of “this is a case which considers” write “this case considers”
Instead of “owing to the fact that” use “since” or “because”
25. 25 Eliminate fluff…
What does the phrase “as such” add to your analysis?
What does “it is important to note that” add?
26. 26 Avoid Nominalization (changing verbs into nouns)
Instead of “will make an argument” use “will argue”
gave consideration to = “considered”
Conducted an investigation = “investigated”
27. 27 Apportioning Word Count… No magic number!
Pare down to relevant facts
Succinct statement of issues
Brief answer means brief!
Analysis - focus on relevant aspects in the context of your fact situation
28. 28 All issues are not created equal…
Say what you need to say and move on!
29. 29 Limit the use of long quotations If an outside authority can advance your argument in language more convincing than your own, use it!
BUT long quotes from cases (or reproducing statutes verbatim) detracts from your analysis; these are easy to skim and the point is sometimes lost on the reader
30. 30 Quotations
Keep the quote or extract short; refer only to what is essential
Give context for the quote by introductory words summarizing what you expect the reader to get from it
31. 31 Refer to judges properly… No comma between name and title
Mr. Justice Owen-Flood
Owen-Flood J.
Pay attention to gender
Justice of the Court of Appeal
Madam Justice Rowles
Rowles J.A.
Chief Justice
Chief Justice Williams
Williams C.J.
32. 32 Citation Follow the rules in the McGill Guide
Provide parallel citations when they are available
If there is a neutral citation – use it!
If there are paragraph numbers in the judgment use them for pinpoint citation
33. 33 Common Errors in Memo Writing Inaccurate analysis of law
Fact (from a precedent case or from case at hand) referred to in the application to facts without being mentioned elsewhere in the memo
Relevant fact omitted from “Facts” section
Brief answers are too long!
34. 34 Common Errors… Incomplete synthesis – eg leaving out an element of the tort
Poor organization – use your synthesis as a check list!
States conclusions only in application to facts instead of arguing both sides
Errors in quotations, citation, punctuation
35. 35 Polish Your Work Practice the 5 time read through from general to specific!
Accuracy
Organization
Paragraph and sentences: structure and clarity
Grammar and Punctuation
Citation