pre class checklist 1
Download
Skip this Video
Download Presentation
Pre-Class Checklist (1)

Loading in 2 Seconds...

play fullscreen
1 / 30

2000 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 390 Views
  • Uploaded on

TV VCR 1 2 3 4 TV out to laptop video in TV 1 2 3 4 VCR 1 2 3 4 Select 3 (Prev.) to Laptop Select 2 (Prog.) to Laptop Select 3 (Prev.) to VCR Select 2 (Prog.) for VCR Pre-Class Checklist (1) Hook up Portable Computer (two cables)

loader
I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
capcha
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about '2000' - andrew


An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
pre class checklist 1

TV

VCR

1

2

3

4

TV out to laptop video in

TV

1 2 3 4

VCR

1 2 3 4

Select 3 (Prev.) to Laptop

Select 2 (Prog.) to Laptop

Select 3 (Prev.) to VCR

Select 2 (Prog.) for VCR

Pre-Class Checklist (1)
  • Hook up Portable Computer (two cables)
    • PC Video out (Second Monitor to side of Table – Aux Computer (Use Standard 15 pin Connection Cord)
    • PC Video in from Back of RadioShack switch – Use Standard RCA Plug
  • Start Computer, Powerpoint, Netmeeting, PowerPoint (Slideshow)
    • Reset Cameras so Image Centered, Correctly Positioned
    • Reset NetMeeting – “Always on Top”, Image Size and Position
  • Use Preview Touchscreen to toggle cameras/input to Laptop
  • Button -- Radioshack TV 3 to send Preview to Laptop (Head,Students,Remote,Elmo)
  • Button – Radioshack VCR 3 to send Preview to VCR, 2 to send Prog. To VCR
  • Toggle VCR 3 -> 2 -> 3 for Streaming Cue

2000 John W. Nazemetz

pre class checklist 2
Pre-Class Checklist (2)
  • Verify TV to “3” (‘Preview’ to Laptop Video In)
  • Verify VCR to “3” (Laptop Composite Output to VCR)
  • Have Students Verify Camera Auto Points to Them.
  • Call ETS to Notify of Program Start
  • Turn on PLAY and RECORD on VCR
    • Are YOU Sure It’s On?
  • Click this slide to advance to 30 Second Introduction and Conduct Class

2000 John W. Nazemetz

slide3

BEGIN CLASS

IN

30

SECONDS

2000 John W. Nazemetz

slide4

BEGIN CLASS

IN

20

SECONDS

2000 John W. Nazemetz

slide5

BEGIN CLASS

IN

10

SECONDS

2000 John W. Nazemetz

slide6

CLICK

BEGIN !!!

2000 John W. Nazemetz

let s begin
Let’s Begin
  • Welcome to Week 14 (The Penultimate)
  • Agenda
    • Get Everybody Ready for Presentations Next Week
    • Discuss Final Exam
    • Observations from Discussion Threads
    • Answer Discussion & HW Questions

2000 John W. Nazemetz

presentation preparation 1
Presentation Preparation (1)
  • Delivery Plans and Sequence
    • Remote Studio Origination
      • Goodyear
        • Steve Daino (Paper Rec’d), Kevin Ferguson
      • OSU-Tulsa
        • Mike Janitz (Paper Rec’d)
      • Seagate
        • Dennis McInerney
  • [Break/Tape Change]
    • Videotape and Slides Shown by Instructor
      • Tom North and Chris Forth
        • NOTE – Already Received Papers and Slides
      • Rakesh Pai (?), Mike Blanton (?)

2000 John W. Nazemetz

presentation preparation 2
Presentation Preparation (2)
  • Delivery Plans and Sequence (cont.)
    • Cordell Studio Origination
      • Jeff Short (Will Drive In – May move up)
  • [Break]
      • Kanagaraj Coimbatore
      • Rahul Deshpande
      • Abhijit Hora
      • Sheng Ma
      • Jaskaran Singh

2000 John W. Nazemetz

presentation preparation 3
Presentation Preparation (3)
  • Papers and slides will be posted as received
  • Slides must be received by Monday Noon and be in supplied format
    • 2/3 – 3/4 of Slide => Text
    • 1/4 -- 1/3 of Slide => Area for “Talking Head”
      • Instructor will load, advance slides for remote studios and Cordell studio
      • Students will be “inset” from studio cameras
      • Allows Students to Talk Looking at Screen

2000 John W. Nazemetz

presentation preparation 311
Presentation Preparation (3)
  • Remote Camera Checks (Face at Right)
    • OSU – Tulsa
      • Mike Janitz
    • Goodyear
      • Steve Daino and Kevin Ferguson
    • Seagate
      • Dennis McInerney
    • OSU – Stillwater
      • Kanagaraj Coimbatore
      • Rahul Despande
      • Abhijit Hora
      • Sheng Ma
      • Jaskaran Singh

2000 John W. Nazemetz

look ahead to final exam 1
Look Ahead to Final Exam (1)
  • Format
    • Similar to Mid-term
      • Open-Ended, Integrative (Systems)
      • Majority of points on material since Midterm
      • Design for 120 minutes
      • Will Allow 150 minutes
        • In Class – 7:15 – 9:45 p.m. Wednesday, December 13, 2000 [Open mike/camera to remote site(s)]
        • Outside Class – Arrange w/Kristi Horner to Fax you exam, you fax back in 2 ½ hours – Take Between December 8 -14 (Fri. – Thurs.)

2000 John W. Nazemetz

look ahead to final exam 2
Look Ahead to Final Exam (2)
  • Topics
    • Pre-Midterm
    • Post Midterm
    • “Bridging” Course

2000 John W. Nazemetz

look ahead to final exam 3
Look Ahead to Final Exam (3)
  • Pre-Midterm Topics
  • CAD, Geometric Modeling (2, 3)
    • Representations/Transformations
    • Data Exchange to Other Functions
  • Computer Control of Manufacturing Systems (6, 8)
    • Numerical Control
    • Programmable Logic Controllers
    • Robotic Systems

2000 John W. Nazemetz

look ahead to final exam 4
Look Ahead to Final Exam (4)
  • Pre-Midterm Topics
  • Computer Integrated Manufacturing
    • Definition -- Key Words/Meanings
    • Concepts -- Life Cycle Orientation/Viewpoint(s)
  • Concurrent Engineering
    • Definition and Goals
    • Comparison to “Traditional”
    • Computer Aided Process Planning
      • Variant/Generative/Group Technology
      • Surface Recognition/Process Association
    • Concurrent Engineering Process Design
      • Quality Deployment Function (QFD)
      • Quantitative Analysis -- Singh Model

2000 John W. Nazemetz

look ahead to final exam 5
Look Ahead to Final Exam (5)
  • Pre-Midterm Topics
  • Group Technology
    • Definition and Philosophy
    • Coding Structures
    • Attributes Used
    • Use of Database Techniques vs. Coding
    • Family and Cell Formation
      • Production Flow Analysis
      • Similarity Indices
      • Procedures -- Linear Programming, Vakaria and Wemmerlov

2000 John W. Nazemetz

look ahead to final exam 6
Look Ahead to Final Exam (6)
  • Pre-Midterm Topics
  • Cellular Manufacturing
    • Definition and Philosophy
    • Cell/Family Formation
  • Flexible Manufacturing Systems
    • Definition and Philosophy
    • Design Steps
  • Numerical Control
    • Definitions/Terms/Types
    • Relation/Types of CIM -- Cellular, FMS, Group Technology, etc.

2000 John W. Nazemetz

look ahead to final exam 7
Look Ahead to Final Exam (7)
  • Pre- Midterm Topics
  • Robotics
    • Definitions/Terms/Types
    • Use and Justification of Use
  • Programmable Controllers
    • Definition/Use
    • Reading/Interpreting Ladder Diagrams

2000 John W. Nazemetz

look ahead to final exam 8
Look Ahead to Final Exam (8)
  • Post-Midterm Topics
  • Manufacturing Systems Planning and Control
    • Dealing with Variation
    • Control Philosophies (Aggregate, JIT,…)
  • Material Handling
    • AGV, ASRS Design
  • Information Exchange
    • Virtual Organizations
    • Meta-Data
    • Mark-up and Semantics

2000 John W. Nazemetz

look ahead to final exam 9
Look Ahead to Final Exam (9)
  • Post-Midterm Topics
  • Information Exchange
    • Supply Chain
    • Information System Design
    • Types of Data Exchange
    • Standardized Data Exchange Alternatives
    • Information/Data Modeling
  • Historical Perspective and Current Issues

2000 John W. Nazemetz

advice how to do well
Advice (How to Do Well)
  • Read the Question
  • Reread the Question
  • Organize Answer/Outline in Mind
  • Select Format for Response
  • Answer the Question Asked
  • No Extra Credit for Answers
  • to Questions not Asked
  • Proofread and Check

2000 John W. Nazemetz

discussion questions
Discussion Questions
  • I am not sure of the exact use of Express Models. Do they have some specific advantages over other database management software?
    • Use – Data model independent of implementation method
    • Not a Database Management tool – Input to Database Design/Implementation

2000 John W. Nazemetz

discussion questions23
Discussion Questions
  • Application Reference Model and Application Activity model use IDEF1X and IDEF0 respectively.Why don\'t these models use EXPRESS?
    • EXPRESS is for (detailed) data modeling (entities and relationships)
    • IDEF shows activities (input, output, controls, resources

2000 John W. Nazemetz

express hw review
EXPRESS HW Review
  • Simplified Modeling Concept–
  • SCHEMA area_of_interest
    • ENTITY named_concept
    • relation_to_other_entities: ONEOF (express_subtype, express_supertype);
    • role_of_following_in_model: ONEOF (declared_data_type, aggregate_type, simple_data_type);
    • WHERE
    • rule_name :
    • value_of type_in_role_1 :=: value_of_type_in_role2;
    • END_ENTITY
  • END_SCHEMA

2000 John W. Nazemetz

express hw review 2
EXPRESS HW Review (2)
  • SCHEMA osu_records
    • ENTITY person
    • sex: ONEOF (male, female);
    • role_at_osu: SET [1,?] (employee, student, applicant, dropout, former_employee, former_student, alumni, dependent)
    • first_name: STRING;
    • last_name: STRING;
    • WHERE
    • same_person :
    • employee_number :=: student_id;
    • END_ENTITY;
  • ENTITY male
      • SUBTYPE OF (person);
      • wife: OPTIONAL female;
    • END_ENTITY;

2000 John W. Nazemetz

express hw review 3
EXPRESS HW Review (3)
  • ENTITY female
    • SUBTYPE OF (person);
    • maiden_name: OPTIONAL STRING;
    • husband: OPTIONAL male;
  • END_ENTITY;
  • ENTITY employee;
  • SUBTYPE OF (person)
  • employee_type: ONE OF (staff, a_and_p, faculty);
  • employee_number: INTEGER;
  • employment_status: ENUMERATION OF (full_time, part_time);
  • date_hired: date;
  • pay_rate: REAL
  • pay_frequency: ONEOF (monthly-pay, biweekly_pay)
  • job_title: STRING;
  • END_ENTITY;

2000 John W. Nazemetz

express hw review 327
EXPRESS HW Review (3)
  • ENTITY former_employee;
  • SUBTYPE OF (employee)
  • date_terminated: date;
  • status: ONEOF ENUMERATION OF (fired, left_voluntarily);
  • comments: STRING;
  • END_ENTITY;
  • ENTITY student;
  • SUBTYPE OF (person)
  • SUPERTYPE OF (applicant)
  • student_classification: ONEOF (ugrad, grad)
  • degree_sought: STRING – Could be in applicant;
  • plan_of_study: SET [0,?] OF course;
  • student_id: INTEGER;
  • END_ENTITY;

2000 John W. Nazemetz

express hw review 4
EXPRESS HW Review (4)
  • ENTITY course;
  • prerequisites: SET [0,?] OF course;
  • cid_number: INTEGER
  • semester_offered: SET [0,?] OF (“spring”, “fall”, “summer”);
  • END_ENTITY;
  • ENTITY date;
  • year: INTEGER;
  • month: INTEGER;
  • WHERE valid_month_1: SELF <= 12;
  • WHERE valid_month_2: SELF >= 1;
  • day: INTEGER;
  • WHERE valid_day_1: SELF <= 31;
  • WHERE valid_day_2: SELF >= 1;
  • END_ENTITY;

2000 John W. Nazemetz

express hw review 5
EXPRESS HW Review (5)
  • Other Comments
    • What is in Model?
      • Lots of ENTITIES and ATTRIBUTES possible
    • Modeling Questions (How to)
      • ENTITIES only appear once in model
      • SCHEMA only contains items of interest in domain being modeled
  • Other Questions?

2000 John W. Nazemetz

slide30
THE END
  • ROLL THE CREDITS 

2000 John W. Nazemetz

ad