1 / 34

Reflections on the Virtual Society?

Reflections on the Virtual Society?. Steve Woolgar ESRC Virtual Society? Programme Sa ï d Business School University of Oxford www.virtualsociety.org.uk ICUST 2001, Paris, 12-14 June 2001. Reflections on the Virtual Society?. The context The Virtual Society? programme

Download Presentation

Reflections on the Virtual Society?

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Reflections on the Virtual Society? Steve Woolgar ESRC Virtual Society? Programme Saïd Business School University of Oxford www.virtualsociety.org.uk ICUST 2001, Paris, 12-14 June 2001

  2. Reflections on the Virtual Society? • The context • The Virtual Society? programme • Results: four rules of virtuality • Reflections • Conclusions: future directions

  3. Reflections on the Virtual Society? • The context • The Virtual Society? programme • Results: four rules of virtuality • Reflections • Conclusions: future directions

  4. The promise of the new technologies: cyberbole • Recent developments • dot com failures; market slow down; end of bubble; but underlying growth continues? • Assumptions to be tested • Technology has definitive effects/capacity • Access is advantageous and desirable; have-nots want access • Access leads to (meaningful) use

  5. Reflections on the Virtual Society? • The context • The Virtual Society? programme • Results: four rules of virtuality • Reflections • Conclusions: future directions

  6. Reflections on the Virtual Society? • The context • The Virtual Society? programme • Results: four rules of virtuality • Reflections • Conclusions: future directions

  7. Virtual Society? - the problem • Massive growth of new electronic technologies, but social context of use still poorly understood • Fundamental shifts in how people behave, organise themselves and interact as a result of new technologies? • Significant changes in the nature/experience of interpersonal relations, communications, social control, participation, cohesion, identity, trust? • Is a Virtual Society possible?

  8. Virtual Society? - the Programme • 1997-2001: 22 projects in 25 UK (and 4 EU) universities • 76 academic researchers; HQ at Oxford • wide range of application areas • counter-intuitive results: “interesting if true” • PROFILE 2000 and website

  9. Some key analytic themes • Effects of technology are socially constructed not determined • Users are configured: development of technology is a process of defining, enabling and constraining the user • Reception and use are socially distributed; delivery does not follow a linear model • Detailed ethnographic studies of actual usage

  10. Reflections on the Virtual Society? • The context • The Virtual Society? programme • Results: four rules of virtuality • Reflections • Conclusions: future directions

  11. Reflections on the Virtual Society? • The context • The Virtual Society? programme • Results: four rules of virtuality • Reflections • Conclusions: future directions

  12. Four Rules of Virtuality • Impact and use of new technologies depends crucially on local social context • Current rate of straightforward rapid expansion may not continue. • Fears and risks associated with new technologies are unevenly socially distributed • New technologies tend to supplement rather than substitute for existing practices and forms of organisation • The more virtual the more real!

  13. 1: Patterns of Access and Use of Internet (Wyatt et al) • Growth conceals marked shifts in nature and consistency of usage • Evidence of a strong drop off in usage among sub groups • People stop using Internet because • become bored • loss of institutional access • too difficult to use • too expensive • intrusion of advertising

  14. 2: Experience of Internet Use (Lea et al) • Does Internet usage engender isolation and loneliness? • US evidence (CMU) that Internet can cause depression, loneliness, sense of isolation, anomie • Lea et al show visual anonymity enhances identification with group, and reinforces existing social boundaries

  15. 3: How much public access is there to the Internet? (Liff et al) • Attracts a much broader cross section than in overall population of Internet users • Access points augment rather than replace home ownership • The policy gap: infrastructure of telecommunications cost and access; but little support for projects on the ground • Social space facilitates/constrains use by different groups: access is a social rather than technical problem

  16. 4: Technology, work and surveillance (Mason et al) • Use of surveillance capacity depends on local context • Little evidence that employees fear threat to privacy • Positive circumvention rather than “resistance”: borrowing PIN numbers • Workers use surveillance capabilities to their own advantage

  17. 5: Virtual community care? (Burrows et al) • Huge growth and scope of wired welfare globally • Internet as knowledge base for middle class welfare • Self organising structure of cyberspace • Problems of status of knowledge obtained on the Internet

  18. 6: The virtual consumer (Lunt and Moor) • Importance of shopping (not just transaction) for household structures and activities • “It’s just typing not shopping”: preference for reproduction of existing shopping arrangements online • Retailers don’t reproduce shopping experience online • E-commerce is boring (lack of issue engagement)

  19. 7: Groupware and the mediation of memory (Brown and Lightfoot) • Designed for the preservation of organisational memory • “Political” uses of email: copying in; prolonging exchanges; public flogging • Hording and storing email as accountability strategies • Email as a highly formal and politicised space (cn the promise of informal communication).

  20. 8: Where the virtual meets the real (Hughes) • The move to “virtual organisation” in banking: need for radically new skills and working practices? • Preserving the normality of the interaction and maintaining customer confidence • Making the new technology at home within existing working practices

  21. Four Rules of Virtuality • Impact and use of new technologies depends crucially on local social context • Current rate of straightforward rapid expansion may not continue. • Fears and risks associated with new technologies are unevenly socially distributed • New technologies tend to supplement rather than substitute for existing practices and forms of organisation • The more virtual the more real!

  22. Reflections on the Virtual Society? • The context • The Virtual Society? programme • Results: four rules of virtuality • Reflections • Conclusions: future directions

  23. Reflections on the Virtual Society? • The context • The Virtual Society? programme • Results: four rules of virtuality • Reflections • Conclusions: future directions

  24. Counter-intuitive results • The temptations of revelatory irony • the value of social scientific research! • “the results are counter-intuitive!!” • But what has happened to our intuitions? • Intuitions derive from visions of technology which are top down, synoptic, summarising, clumping • government policy pronouncements, supply side visions, advertising rhetoric, media polarisation

  25. Counter-intuitive results • Media treatment depends on contrast between definitive versions of what the technology can do • eg the media storm • The appeal of counter-intuitive/ironic outcomes; the inversion of claims about definitive effects • eg tele-shopping depots

  26. Mundane experiences of technology • None of this pays attention to mundane experiences of T • Practical day-to-day usage does not depend on synoptic, definitive versions of what the technology can do • Our mundane experiences are more characterised by ambivalence. Technology is: • good/bad • love/hate • works/does not work

  27. Revisiting the research rationale • “Virtual society” is one example of the recent profusion of epithets • Epithets are synoptic, top down, claims to novelty, change • Epithetical visions should be understood as part of wider processes of change and accountability • These visions to be treated as agonistic claims • Hence the genealogy of the “?” in Virtual Society?

  28. Reflections on the Virtual Society? • The context • The Virtual Society? programme • Results: four rules of virtuality • Reflections • Conclusions: future directions

  29. Reflections on the Virtual Society? • The context • The Virtual Society? programme • Results: four rules of virtuality • Reflections • Conclusions: future directions

  30. The New Agenda • New policy context/agenda: post hype deflation of dot.com bubble; evidence of partial saturation • New emphasis: from access to use

  31. From access to use • Promises of universal access are unrealistic (cf telephones) • Access does not guarantee use; use does not require access (cf Trinidad); meaningful use requires building upon (existing) social relations

  32. The New Agenda • New policy context/agenda: post hype deflation of dot.com bubble; evidence of saturation • New emphasis: from access to use • Need to work from mundane, bottom up experiences • Emphasise situated context of use, inter-media and on-line/off-line relations • New forms of sociality: rethinking central concepts of social theory: information, power, organisation, discourse, knowledge

  33. Conclusion: principles for future analysis • Anti-clumping: dis-aggregate, dis-aggregate! • Focus on mundane experiences: ambivalence • Analytic scepticism • technography: an anthropological/ethnographic perspective on actual experiences of use • beware cyberbole! - institutionalise the “?”

  34. Reflections on the Virtual Society? Steve Woolgar ESRC Virtual Society? Programme Saïd Business School University of Oxford www.virtualsociety.org.uk ICUST 2001, Paris, 12-14 June 2001

More Related