1 / 25

Biomolecular Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy

01/28/04. Biomolecular Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy. BIOCHEMISTRY BEYOND STRUCTURE Protein dynamics from NMR Analytical biochemistry Comparative analysis Interactions between biomolecules. Tutorial on resonance assignments (see the website). Why The Interest In Dynamics? .

andren
Download Presentation

Biomolecular Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. 01/28/04 Biomolecular Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy BIOCHEMISTRY BEYOND STRUCTURE • Protein dynamics from NMR • Analytical biochemistry • Comparative analysis • Interactions between biomolecules Tutorial on resonance assignments (see the website)

  2. Why The Interest In Dynamics? • Function requires motion/kinetic energy • Entropic contributions to binding events • Protein Folding/Unfolding • Uncertainty in NMR and crystal structures • Effect on NMR experiments-spin relaxation is dependent on rate of motions  know dynamics to predict outcomes and design new experiments • Quantum mechanics/prediction (masochism)

  3. Characterizing Protein Dynamics: Parameters/Timescales

  4. Dynamics From NMR Parameters • Number of signals per atom: multiple signals for slow exchange between conformational states Two resonances (A,B) for one atom Populations ~ relative stability Rex < w (A) - w (B) Rate Estimates A B • Multiple states are hard to detect by Xray crystallography

  5. Dynamics From NMR Parameters • Number of signals per atom: multiple signals for slow exchange between conformational states • Linewidths: narrow = faster motion, wide = slower; dependent on MW and structure

  6. B A B A 15N 15N 15N 1H 1H 1H Linewidth is Dependent on MW • Linewidth determined by size of particle • Fragments have narrower linewidths Arunkumar et al., JBC (2003)

  7. 40 173 P Detecting Functionally Independent Domains in Multi-Domain Proteins RPA32 RPA14 > 300 residues / ~80 signals Why? • Flexibility facilitates interactions with protein targets

  8. Dynamics From NMR Parameters • Number of signals per atom: multiple signals for slow exchange between conformational states • Linewidths: narrow = faster motion, wide = slower; dependent on MW and conformational states • Exchange of NH with solvent:slow timescales (milliseconds to years!) • Requires local and/or global unfolding events • NH involved in H-bond exchanges slowly • Surface or flexible region: NH exchanges rapidly

  9. Dynamics From NMR Parameters • Number of signals per atom: multiple signals for slow exchange between conformational states • Linewidths: narrow = faster motion, wide = slower; dependent on MW and conformational states • Exchange of NH with solvent:slow timescales • NMR relaxation measurements (ps-ns, ms-ms) • R1 (1/T1) spin-lattice relaxation rate (z-axis) • R2 (1/T2) spin-spin relaxation rate (xy-plane) • Heteronuclear NOE (e.g. 15N- 1H)

  10. Dynamics To Probe The OriginOf Structural Uncertainty  Weak correlation • Measurements show if high RMSD is due to high flexibility (low S2)   Strong correlation  

  11. Analytical Protein Biochemistry • Purity (can detect >99%)- heterogeneity, degradation, buffer • Check on sequence (fingerprint regions)

  12. Protein Fingerprints 1H COSY 15N-1H HSQC 13C HSQC also! Assay structure from residue counts in each fingerprint

  13. Comparative Analysis • Different preparations, chemical modifications • Conformational heterogeneity (e.g. cis-trans isomerization) • Homologous proteins, mutants, engineered proteins

  14. B A B A Comparative Analysis of StructureIs the protein still the same when we cut it in half? RPA70 • Chemical shift is extremely sensitive • If peaks are the same, structure is the same • But, if peaks are different, differences not directly interpretable 15N 15N 15N 2 2 3 1H 3 1 1 1H 1H Same idea for comparing mutants or homologs Arunkumar et al., JBC (2003)

  15. Biochemical Assay of MutationsMutations can effect folding and stability Wild-type Partially destabilized Partially destabilized & hetero-geneous Unfolded Ohi et al., NSB (2003)

  16. Biochemical Assay of MutationsWhat is the cause of the Prp19-1 defect? Not perturbation at binding interface  Destabilized U-box leads to drop in activity Ohi et al., NSB (2003)

  17. NMR to Study Interactions • Monitor the binding of molecules • Determine binding constants (discrete off rates, on rates) • Identify binding interfaces

  18. Monitoring Binding Events Titration monitored by 15N-1H HSQC NMR Provides • Site-specific • Multiple probes • In-depth information • Spatial distribution of responses can be mapped on structure

  19. Binding Constants From NMR Stronger Weaker Molar ratio of d-CTTCA Fit change in chemical shift to binding equation Arunkumar et al., JBC (2003)

  20. C N Winged Helix-Loop-Helix Probing Protein InteractionsStructure is the Starting Point! Mer et al., Cell (2000)

  21. Probe Binding Events by NMR15N-RPA32C + Unlabeled XPA1-98 15N-1H HSQC • Only 19 residues affected • Discrete binding site • Signal broadening  exchange between the bound and un-bound state • Kd > 1 mM RPA32C RPA32C + XPA 1-98 Mer et al., Cell (2000)

  22. C N Map XPA Binding Site on RPA32C Using NMR Map of chemical shift perturbations on the structure of RPA32C Mer et al., Cell (2000)

  23. Map Site for RPA32C on XPA • Same residues bind to peptide and protein • Same binding site • Slower exchange for peptide • Kd < 1 mM XPA1-98 domain XPA29-46 peptide Mer et al., Cell (2000)

  24. Manual Database Search Predicts Binding Sites in Other DNA Repair Proteins XPA29-46 UDG79-88 RAD257-274 E R K RQR A L ML R QA R L A A R R I Q RNK A A AL L RL A A R R K L RQK Q L Q Q Q F R E R M E K Mer et al., Cell (2000)

  25. All Three Proteins Bind to RPA32CBinding Sites are Identical UDG79-88 RAD257-274 XPA29-46 Mer et al., Cell (2000)

More Related