1 / 25

Prepared by: Richard S. Biondi, FCAS, MAAA Milliman USA

Casualty Actuarial Society 2002 Seminar on Ratemaking March 8, 2002 Medical Malpractice - Advanced Topics Hospital Professional Liability Rating. Prepared by: Richard S. Biondi, FCAS, MAAA Milliman USA. Hospitals vs. Physicians Rating. Hospital rating more complex More judgment required

anahid
Download Presentation

Prepared by: Richard S. Biondi, FCAS, MAAA Milliman USA

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Casualty Actuarial Society 2002 Seminar on RatemakingMarch 8, 2002Medical Malpractice - Advanced TopicsHospital Professional Liability Rating Prepared by: Richard S. Biondi, FCAS, MAAA Milliman USA

  2. Hospitals vs. Physicians Rating • Hospital rating more complex • More judgment required • Market more competitive for large risks • Hospitals less profitable than physicians Milliman USA

  3. Largest Physician Writers Milliman USA

  4. Largest Hospital Writers Milliman USA

  5. Rating Methods for Hospitals 1. Alternative Exposure Bases/Classifications 2. Experience and Schedule Rating Milliman USA

  6. Hospital Exposure Base Four most commonly used systems: 1. Conventional System 2. Refined Conventional System 3. HIF System 4. Diagnosis System Milliman USA

  7. Exposure Base: Conventional System Three Step Process: 1. Facility classified as: • Clinic, dispensary, infirmary (out-patient only) • Convalescent or nursing home • Hospital NOC (not otherwise classified) • Mental institution • Miscellaneous (blood banks, wellness centers, etc.) Milliman USA

  8. Exposure Base: Conventional System 2. Further classification: • For profit • Not for profit • Government 3. Given type of facility: 2 main exposure bases: • Occupied beds - average number of occupied beds per year • 100 outpatient visits (annual) • 2000 outpatient visits = 1 occupied bed Milliman USA

  9. Exposure Base: Conventional System 4. Employed Physicians: • Share hospital limits • Discounted rates Milliman USA

  10. Refined System • Refined bed classifications: (1) neo-natal, (2) obstetrical, and (3) other • Refined outpatient visits: (1) surgical visits, (2) emergency room visits, and (3) all other • More responsive to risk characteristics of individual hospitals Milliman USA

  11. HIF System • 1986-87 - Large HPL insurers (Hospital Insurance Forum) commissioned actuarial study to analyze alternative rating loss • Recommended Exposure Base: (1) Acute Care Occupied Beds (2) Psychiatric Occupied Beds (3) Extended Care Occupied Beds (4) Births (5) Inpatient Surgeries (6) Outpatient Surgeries (7) Emergency Room Visits (8) Other Outpatient Visits Milliman USA

  12. Diagnosis System • 1994, St. Paul develops significantly different HPL exposure based system • Inpatient exposures rated on a discharge basis by diagnosis type (elimination of length of stay) • Outpatient visits rated by type (emergency visits, surgical visits, and all other) Milliman USA

  13. Diagnosis System • Type of Diagnosis: – 19 major categories (International Classification of Diseases, WHO) – Eight Rating Categories – Examples: Group contains infectious and parasitic disease, blood and blood forming organic disease, skin and subcutaneous tissue disease • Conversion Factors Milliman USA

  14. Variables Not Measured by Exposure Bases • Patient Demographics - Age, Education, Income • Specialty Hospitals - e.g. Manhattan Eye & Ear • Outsourcing of Hospital Functions - e.g. Emergency Room Milliman USA

  15. Experience Rating Plan • Plan attempts to more accurately rate an individual insured by using insured’s own experience to the extent it is indicative of future experience • Plan must balance experience and credibility Milliman USA

  16. Experience Rating Plan Three step process: 1. An experience loss cost is developed using the actual loss experience of the insured 2. A premium is developed based on the manual rate, which is the experience of all insureds 3. The results of the first two steps are combined and any necessary adjustments are made Milliman USA

  17. Characteristics of a Hospital Rating Plan • Use mature limited losses • Reflect Trend, Development, ILFs • Recognize General Liability coverage, if applicable • Adjust for Employed Physician’s Premium • Credibility standard • Schedule Credits/Debits • Aggregate Limitation Factor Milliman USA

  18. Employed Physician’s Premium (EPP) • EPP computed using current rates for each rating class and territory. • Give credit for EPP losses already included in loss experience. • Give discount to reflect lower cost of insuring a hospital employee relative to a self-employed doctor. • Add EPP to both manual rate and experience loss cost. Milliman USA

  19. Credibility Standard • Dependent on hospitals’ size and length of experience period • Typical Formula: Credibility = N/(N+ 500) where N: bed equivalents for all experience period years combined = Occupied beds +Outpatient Visits 2,000 Milliman USA

  20. Schedule Rating • Credits or debits for (1) known characteristics of risk not reflected in the experience or rate, or (2) changes in the nature of the risk since the end of the experience period • Usually subject to maximum credit/debit of 25% Milliman USA

  21. Examples of items used for Schedule Rating • Compliance/non-compliance with insurance company loss prevention recommendations • Existence or lack of continuing education programs for staff • Accreditation or lack of accreditation by Joint Commission on Accreditation of Hospitals or American Osteopathic Association • Existence or lack of effective patient incident reports and analysis system Milliman USA

  22. Aggregate Limitation Factor (ALF) • Factor to reflect expected amounts of loss that would exceed aggregate policy limit on an annual basis • Function of annual expected loss and selected aggregate limit • Calculated using simulation technique Milliman USA

  23. ALF Simulation Procedure • Calculate ultimate loss based on recent experience (limited) • Severity: 1. Select distribution (lognormal) and use limited expected value functions to estimate parameters. 2. Calculate limited average severity and trend to policy effective period. • Frequency: 1. Calculate expected number of claims based on ultimate loss and average severity. 2. Select distribution (negative binomial) and solve for parameters. • Simulate policy year number of claims and severity to calculate losses. • Calculate ratio of limited to unlimited loss = ALF. • Repeat until convergence. • Adjust for ALAE Milliman USA

  24. Nursing Homes • Once rated as class of hospitals • Free standing vs. part of hospital • Rate per resident was 5% - 10% of acute care hospital bed rate • Today much higher: 50% + relative to acute care hospital bed rate • Biggest increases in Florida, Texas, Southern US Milliman USA

  25. Nursing Homes • Nursing Home Classes: • Skilled Nursing Care • Intermediate Care • Residential Care • Independent Living Milliman USA

More Related