1 / 11

Massive Star Clusters in Non-Interacting Galaxies Dynamical Mass Estimates and the (I)MF

Massive Star Clusters in Non-Interacting Galaxies Dynamical Mass Estimates and the (I)MF. Søren S. Larsen ESO / ST-ECF, Garching. Tom Richtler, Concepcion  Jean P. Brodie, UCO / Lick  Deidre A. Hunter, Lowell. See also: Larsen & Richtler, A&A, in press ( astro-ph/0407610 )

amelie
Download Presentation

Massive Star Clusters in Non-Interacting Galaxies Dynamical Mass Estimates and the (I)MF

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Massive Star Clusters in Non-Interacting Galaxies Dynamical Mass Estimates and the (I)MF Søren S. Larsen ESO / ST-ECF, Garching Tom Richtler, Concepcion  Jean P. Brodie, UCO / Lick  Deidre A. Hunter, Lowell See also: Larsen & Richtler, A&A, in press (astro-ph/0407610) Larsen, Brodie & Hunter, AJ, in press (astro-ph/0407373)

  2. Motivation • “Massive” (104-106 M) young star clusters have been found in several nearby galaxies • Appear similar to old globular clusters in terms of sizes and masses, but will they really evolve into bona-fide old (~1 Hubble time) GCs? • One key question is the (I)MF shape - if deficient in low-mass stars, clusters might disrupt prematurely • Is IMF universal, or are there variations? Direct observations of low-mass stars generally unfeasible beyond Local Group => dynamical M/L ratios of YMCs represent one way to constrain IMF

  3. M/L ratios and IMFs for YMCs M/L ratios from high-dispersion spectroscopy and HST imaging Mvir ≈ 10 Rhlr vx2 / G Rhlr = half-light radius vx = line-of-sight velocity dispersion Degeneracy: IMF slope / lower mass limit Top-heavy IMFs Bottom-heavy IMFs Mengel et al. 2002, A&A 383, 137 SSP models from Leitherer et al. 1999 (Starburst99; 0.1 - 100 M)

  4. Caveats • Hard to find good targets (spatial resolution, bright enough for high-dispersion spectroscopy, isolated, uniform background) • Youngest clusters relaxed? • Mass segregation (primordial or dynamical) • Macroturbulence in red supergiants ~ 10 km/s => dominates over velocity dispersions for masses < ~105 M • Statistical fluctuations (~20 RSGs in 105 M cluster at 107 years)

  5. Our Observations • 7 YMCs in 4 nearby (3-6 Mpc) galaxies: NGC 4214 (irr), NGC 4449 (irr), NGC 5236 (sp) and NGC 6946 (sp) • Masses > 105 M, ages 15 Myrs - 800 Myrs (from broad-band colours) • HST imaging: cluster profiles well resolved (1 WFPC2 pixel ~ 1.5 pc at 3 Mpc) • VLT/UVES and Keck/HIRES/NIRSPEC echelle spectroscopy => velocity dispersions through cross-correlation analysis (Tonry & Davis 1979)

  6. Target galaxies NGC 6946 NGC 4449 NGC 4214 NGC 5236

  7. Cluster sizes: EFF Model Fits F555W Residuals Sizes determined with baolab/ishape software (Larsen 1999). Convolves TinyTim PSF with Elson, Fall & Freeman (EFF) models of the form P(r) ~ [1-(r/rc)2]-

  8. Cross-Correlation Functions (CCFs) Velocity dispersion: vx2 = TC2 - TT2 where TC and TT are the dispersions of the cluster-template and template-template CCFs (Tonry & Davis 1979) Notes: 1) No individual strong lines are required for this technique to work. 2) Intrinsic broadening of lines (macroturbulence etc.) “cancels out”. Velocity dispersions Keck/HIRES spectra

  9. Cluster Properties

  10. M/L ratios and the IMF • UVES data (M83) HIRES data (Dwarfs) NIRSPEC (N6946) All 7 clusters consistent with Kroupa-type or Salpeter (Mmin=0.1 M) IMF. Solid black curve: Bruzual+Charlot SSP models. Others: Basic SSP models based on Padua isochrones No top-heavy IMFs (Models for Z=0.008)

  11. Summary • Clusters with masses in the range 104 M -106 M can form in disks of “normal” spirals and in dwarf galaxies, in addition to starbursts and mergers • The clusters analyzed here have M/L ratios consistent with “normal” IMFs (usual disclaimers apply..) • Such objects may provide direct insight into processes related to the formation of globular clusters in the early Universe

More Related