SEA Area Report
This presentation is the property of its rightful owner.
Sponsored Links
1 / 26

SEA Area Report PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 85 Views
  • Uploaded on
  • Presentation posted in: General

SEA Area Report. Reston, VA, USA, 26 October 2005. SEA Includes: System Architecture, Information Architecture & Security Working Groups SANA BoF (seeking WG status now) SGIA BoF (initial meeting) XML Standards and Guidelines SIG (initial meeting) Responsibilities

Download Presentation

SEA Area Report

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Presentation Transcript


Sea area report

SEA Area Report

Reston, VA, USA, 26 October 2005


System engineering area overview

SEA Includes:

System Architecture, Information Architecture & Security Working Groups

SANA BoF (seeking WG status now)

SGIA BoF (initial meeting)

XML Standards and Guidelines SIG (initial meeting)

Responsibilities

Overall architecture for space mission communications, operations, and cross-support

Coordinate and collaborate with the other areas about architectural choices and options

Support the CESG in evaluating consistency of all area programs of work with the defined architecture

Create such working groups and BoFs as are required to progress the work of CCSDS

System Engineering AreaOverview


System engineering area summary current wgs and bofs

System Architecture WG - Met in Atlanta

Develop a high level system architecture reference model and formal methodology and tools.

Finalize Reference Architecture for Space Data Systems (RASDS) V1 Magenta Book

Discuss how to progress future work on architectural formalisms

Information Architecture WG - Met in Atlanta

Develop a high level Information Architecture reference model and definitions of active and passive information objects

Finalize Reference Architecture for Space Information Management (RASIM) V1 Green Book

Discuss how / where to begin work to define component interfaces and standards

Security WG - Met in Atlanta

Develop security overview & threat assessment, and security architecture, framework and related standards

Progress Security Architecture and other specific security elements (Key management, Crypto and Authentication Standards)

Discussions with other WGs as needed

System Engineering Area Summary:Current WGs and BOFs


System engineering area summary current wgs and bofs1

SANA BoF - Met in Atlanta

Develop detailed requirements for the Space Assigned Numbers Authority (SANA), an implementation approach and a plan for a rapid prototype to demonstrate functionality

Finalize SANA charter, submitted to CESG for approval

Demo SANA prototype

New BoF & SIGs

Space Ground Interoperability Architecture (SGIA) BoF - Met in Atlanta

Develop an end to end space / ground cross support architecture and services catalog in response to IOAG request

Initiate SGIA charter discussions, create shared vision for task

XML Standards & Guidelines (XSG) SIG - Met in Atlanta

Develop guidelines and standard approaches for XML schema and namespaces, short fuse due to immediate WG needs

Created agreed task concept, identified chair and members, initiated discussions, first telecon held

System Engineering Area Summary:Current WGs and BOFs


System engineering area summary current wgs and bofs2

New BoF & SIGs, contd

Delta-DOR End to End Processing - Discussed w/ CESG in Atlanta

Develop an end to end approach to Delta-DOR processing, including RF signals, data reception, raw data capture & transmission, data processing, delivery of products and ancillary information such as quasar catalogs

Initiate discussions, create shared vision for task and where / how the work should be carried out, co-location problems, first telecon held

Data Management / Data Accountability - brief discussion in Atlanta

Develop an end to end data management and data accountability approach

Initiate discussions, create shared vision for task and where / how the work should be carried out

System Engineering Area Summary:Current WGs and BOFs


Sawg summary technical status

Systems Architecture WG

Goal: Develop a reference architecture and a formal representation method

Working Group Status: Active ___ Idle ___ Work is suspended _X_

Working Group Summary Situation:

Working Group Summary progress:

Updated the RASDS document (nearly final RP)

Started to develop a formal model (before WB)

Problems and Issues:

Requested by CMC to cease work on formal models

Development of formal model is deemed essential by SAWG

SAWG Summary Technical Status


Sea area report

  • SecWG Summary Technical Status

  • Security WG

    • Goal:

    • Working Status: Active __X_ Idle ____

    • Summary progress: Three documents actively being produced (Security Green Book, Security Architecture, Threat). All docs green. Green Book to CESG.

    • Progress since last meeting: Completed Green Book, completed Threat document, completed Encryption and Authentication Trade Studies – agreed on algorithms

    • Problems and Issues: Resources – need to ensure continued participation from all member agencies

status:

OK

CAUTION

PROBLEM

Working Group is advancing and producing good products.

Docs OK. New work OK.


Iawg summary technical status

Information Architecture WG

Goal: Develop a Reference Architecture for Space Information Management as extension to RASDS Information Viewpoint

Working Group Status: Active _X_ Idle ___

Working Group Summary Situation:

Working Group Summary progress:

Updated the RASIM document (nearly complete GB),

Discussed how to transition to development of components & interfaces

Problems and Issues:

Agreement on transition is still unclear

Availability of agency participants with right skill set is uncertain

IAWG Summary Technical Status

Status:

OK

CAUTION

PROBLEM

Comment:

Transition

Unclear


Sana bof executive summary

SANA BOF on 15 September 2005 in Atlanta, GA

8 representatives included NASA (JPL, GSFC, MSFC), ESA

Intention

Establish plan, processes and recommended practices for CCSDS Space Assigned Numbers Authority (SANA)

Define content, overall approach, and means for updating included information

Define how the SANA would work with different CCSDS WGs, registries, and with agency specific elements

Establish practice for future maintenance and sustaining of the SANA

Motivation:

Primarily provide access to CCSDS global information

Manage central info centrally as authoritative source

Support local management of distributed agency & mission info, provide central pointers to their authoritative sources

Existing SANA is largely conceptual, as defined in CCSDS A02.1-Y-2.Restructured Organization and Processes for the Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems. Yellow Book. Issue 2. April 2004:

“SANA” materials are in some existing repositories and also are buried within a number of different CCSDS documents

Users have a very difficult time locating these within the CCSDS web site and understanding how they relate one to the other

SANA BOF Executive Summary


Sana bof recommendations

Update the SANA charter to reflect agreements from meeting and submit to the CESG for approval

Ensure that the SANA can deal with the complexity of future spaceflight programs, projects and the technologies involved

Help reduce stove piping

Setup a mechanism to access and apply specific information technologies through registry processes and artifacts (CCSDS common S/W)

Introduce information management commonality across operational domains Enable interoperability & reuse (data dictionaries & glossary, schemas, assigned numbers, common name registry)

Provide commonality at the technical & operational level among disparate projects and development organizations

Single point of (common) access for management, technologists, developers and operators to technically relevant CCSDS related information (SANA=web link management)

SANA BOF Recommendations


Sgia bof executive summary

11 representatives included NASA (JPL, MSFC), ESA, CSA, and JAXA participation

Attendees: Shames, Okino, Crichton, Weiss, Yamada, Kearney, Peccia, Gannet, Hughes, Reich, Hartmann

Coordination Identified:

JPL and MSFC are actively supporting effort

ESA has indicated that they will provide some level of support (telecon, email coordination level) – support from existing SAWG members

CNES & JAXA are seeking support

General agreement on: Charter of SGIA

Some CHANGE in terms of generalization as to the service provider/user model, specifically do not constrain to SLE

General agreement on: 5 step process

Some CHANGE in terms of language to capture iteration and stakeholder feedback towards

the cross support service catalog

cross support service architecture

Some CHANGE in terms of refinement of the content, including process as well as the level of detail of the cross support service catalog was identified.

SGIA BoF Executive Summary


Sgia bof discussion

There was general concern as to what the SGIA architecture would entail:

A specific suggestion was that it may be sufficient to provide gateway interfaces

Possible options are to present interoperability at the gateway level or end-to-end service along with identified confederated nodes and profiles.

Desire to ensure that existing organizational boundaries and implementation approaches are accommodated

Leverage IOAG DRAFT catalog and architecture

Schedule - general belief we could get an initial WB by June 06 meeting

There was some concern about the scope and meaning of “profiles”.

SGIA BoF Discussion


Xsg sig executive summary

XSG SIG on 14 September 2005 in Atlanta, GA

23 representatives included NASA (JPL, GSFC, MSFC), ESA, CNES, OMG SDTF, and other participation

Intention

Establish guidelines and recommended practices for CCSDS XML schema, naming, and usage before this first set of schema, from several different working groups, become finalized and externally visible

Define common rules, naming and style guides, define URL hierarchy and namespace architecture, define versioning and use schema location as a resolvable URL

Motivation:

Get CCSDS namespace and rules sorted out before current standards are finalized

Four separate XML schemas are in development, there is no consistency of naming, usage, namespace, etc across them

Enable interoperable implementations of SW and systems

Create collaborative solutions and an authoritative source for CCSDS and agency use

XSG SIG Executive Summary


Xsg sig recommendations

Create a small working group of current XML schema authors and experts to develop short term approach

XML Stds & Guidelines SIG

Erik Barkley (CSS, NASA / JPL)

David Berry (MOIMS, NASA / JPL)

Lou Reich (chair, MOIMS, NASA / GSFC)

Gerry Simon (OMG Space DTF)

Arnaud Lucas(CSS, CNES)

Martin Soto (ESA)

Define a URL hierarchy and namespace architecture

Create a naming and style guide, including guidelines for development of schema and namespace

Define versioning approach

Create a resolvable URL for schemaLocation, ( create a CCSDS server for these, future)

Define levels of XML schema reusable components (potentially based on the UBL model)

Define approach for consistent use of qualified and unqualified types, elements and attributes

Get a CCSDS NID by submitting an RFC to IETF, establish base for URN, list of 23 exist now (RFC 3406, May 2005), see also IANA registry of URI (RFC 3986)

XSG SIG Recommendations


Sea liaisons

SysML Partners have developed a system engineering modeling language based upon UML 2.0. A liaison has been agreed to, which opens up a communication channel between the SEA and SysML groups. The intent is to provide the SysML solution to CCSDS for their validation for application to Space Systems.  

SysML agreed to form a liaison w/ CCSDS. SEA, on behalf of CCSDS, has agreed to that liaison and several joint meetings have been held.

The SysML spec is currently at version 0.9. Four UML tool vendors have demonstrated SysML 0.9 compliant versions of their tools. A summary presentation is available from the SysML web site.

An informal liaison has been developed with ISO/IEC JTC 1 / SC7 which is developing an UML for RM-ODP approach. This opens up a useful communication channel between the two groups. The intent is to validate the RASDS to the RM-ODP and to provide feedback to the SC7 WG it its applicability to Space Systems.  

The JTC 1 / SC 7 chair has agreed to establish an informal liaison w/ CCSDS. SEA, on behalf of CCSDS, has agreed to that liaison and a joint meeting and telecons have been held.

SEA Liaisons


Cross area wg bof issues

Information Architecture (IA) elements becoming more important to other groups

SLE (data dictionaries, XML schemas, …)

CSS (SMWG) and MOIMS (NavWG & IPR WG) use of XML schemas

XML Standards and Guidelines SIG

SANA, various new and future registries

IAWG needs on-going coordination with MOIMS Information Packaging and Registries (IPR).

Much more partnering is occurring with a focus on how to define an information infrastructure (interfaces, specifications, architecture, components and best practices)

Recommend that BoF be created for cross-cutting information infrastructure specification (registries, repositories) that gets participation from agency specialists as well as stakeholders

Cross Area WG / BOF Issues


Cross area wg bof issues1

Security is a cross-cutting discipline that needs to be included in many other Areas and WGs.

CESG is alerted that other Areas and WG should request support from the Security WG (in addition to the SecWG being proactive).

We believe that the mandatory security section in documents will force the other Areas and WGs to seek out help.

Recommend that existing security section be strengthened, waivers are too lenient

Propose a SecWG overview briefing at the Spring ‘06 meeting opening plenary to cover everyone at one time

Security 101 and SecWG initiatives within CCSDS

Cross Area WG / BOF Issues


Sea other issues concerns

SGIA participation from WGs & IOAG agencies

Major issue if IOAG operational organizations do not provide technical point of contact (TPOC)

Delta-DOR end to end process and flow

Study has been initiated, NASA/JPL & ESA participation

CESG Agreement on definition of “Recommended Practice”

A “Litmus Test” has been created by CESG

XML Standards & Guidelines SIG resources

Support from other WGs for short term appears adequate

SANA coordination with other WGs & agencies

Need to get the charter released and approved

Data Management / Data Accountability BoF and where to do the work

SEA Other Issues & Concerns


Backup slides

BACKUP SLIDES


Sawg executive summary

Review of the RASDS document was done by the SAWG members and an expert on RM-ODP. Some issues were found but the WG agreed to necessary updates to the document.

It was agreed to send the updated RASDS document, based on the discussion at this meeting, to CESG and CMC for approval as a Recommended Practice document.

It was also agreed that the work on development of a RASDS formal model should be continued in some form (preferably by a CCSDS BoF/WG) leveraging the liaison relationship established with the ISO/IEC group developing “UML for ODP.”

SAWG Executive Summary


Secwg executive summary

Attendees from CNES, BNSC (telecon), NASA/GSFC, NASA/ Langley (telecon), ESA/ESOC (a first!), DLR, NASA/JPL & NASA/GRC (brief)

Discussed and revised the SecWG Security Architecture documents

Discussed and accepted proposals for CCSDS standards for:

Encryption (AES w/ min 128-bit key, additional algorithms allowed)

Authentication/integrity (Digital Signature Standard for public key-based authentication, HMAC-SHA1 for MAC-based authentication)

Discussed CNES approach to developing security requirements and their use of the EBIOS tool

Discussed the development of:

Security Policy Framework

Information Security Planning Guide

Potential usage of Common Criteria to develop mission Protection Profiles

Discussed issues from NASA DSWG – identity management, SCID “exposure” on SANA (aggregates of public data may be a security risk).

SecWG Executive Summary


Iawg executive summary

Six people attended the IA meeting from JPL, GSFC, Marshall and CSA.

The draft Reference Architecture for Space Information Management Green Book was discussed

Included the updates from the NASA TIM that occurred in August.

Established much improved convergence between GSFC and JPL with respect to the relationship between IA and OAIS.

Chapter 2, the information model, requires more substantial updates than Chapter 3, the functional information management components.

The afternoon IAWG session was canceled in lieu of the meeting on XML best practices (XSG SIG)

IAWG Executive Summary


Sea cross area coordination

CSS:

SGIA role TBD

Transport security

Use of SecWG authentication & access control

MOIMS:

Coordination between Information Packaging and Registries & Information Architecture, discussions on-going

SGIA role TBD

Discussions of development of DM / DA BoF effort needed

Use of RASDS in SM&C doc

Use of SecWG authentication and security framework

SIS:

Relationships among AMS, MTS, and MOIMS S/C Mon & Con protocol (SM&C)

SGIA role TBD

Uplink & downlink network layer security

SLS:

SGIA role TBD

Uplink & downlink link & physical layer security

SOIS:

SGIA role TBD

Uplink, downlink & on-board security

SEA Cross Area Coordination


Sea resolutions to be sent to cesg and then to cmc

RESOLUTION 1 : SEA-SecWG-R-0509-001

Considering that:

The SecWG sent a resolution up requesting that every CCSDS document contain a standard security section. The return flow indicated this was passed.

More than a year later we learn that the language was changed (only blue books, resource problems allow provide a waiver, etc).

And recognizing that:

CCSDS must ensure that security is adequately addressed in our standards,

The current wording in the CMC resolution is too weak,

The AREA resolves that:

The Standard security section should require that include ALL CCSDS documents, not just Blue Books, include the mandatory security section, and …

The security section be mandatory and not waived based on resources.

ACTION ITEM 1: SEA-SecWG-A-0509-001

Request that the CMC update policy on security section to make it mandatory on all CCSDS documents and to remove simple “resources waiver”. At minimum this should apply to Blue, Orange, and Magenta Books.

SEA Resolutions to be Sent to CESG and Then to CMC


Outcomes of earlier sea resolutions sent to cesg

ACTION ITEM 1: SEA-SecWG-A-0504-001

Request that the CMC review SecWG scope and requirements for cross support and interoperability with agency security policy experts.

ACTION ITEM 1: SEA-SecWG-A-0504-002

Request that the CMC provide adequate resources to the SEA / SecWG to accomplish development of encryption and authentication/integrity standards which are fully adapted to the space community and have been profiled, implemented, and tested before becoming CCSDS recommended standards no later than the end of April 2005.

ACTION ITEM 3: SEA-A-0504-001

Request that the CESG develop a clear and unambiguous process for submitting and resolving RIDs no later than the end of May 2005.

ACTION ITEM 1: SEA-A-0504-002

Request that the areas that have developed or are developing reference architectures or service interfaces to provide them to the SAWG and work with the SAWG to ensure that they and their cross area interactions are correctly understood and properly documented.

Outcomes of Earlier SEA Resolutions Sent to CESG


Points to ponder

Things should be as simple as possible,

But no simpler.

Albert Einstein

Internet Robustness Principle -

Be liberal in what you accept, and

conservative in what you send.

Jon Postel, RFC 793 & 1122

Though ambition in itself is a vice,

Yet it is often a source of virtue.

Old Chinese proverb

(from Hsu’s Fortune Cookie)

Suggested for consideration by all ADs and WG chairs

Points to Ponder


  • Login