Accuracy Assessment Methods and Results for Two Satellite Imagery Derived Landcover and Landuse Data...
This presentation is the property of its rightful owner.
Sponsored Links
1 / 33

Image based on photo by Peggy Greb, USDA ARS (Richard Lowrance in foreground) PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 96 Views
  • Uploaded on
  • Presentation posted in: General

Accuracy Assessment Methods and Results for Two Satellite Imagery Derived Landcover and Landuse Datasets Raymond Crew - GIS Researcher and MS Candidate Rick L. Day - Associate Professor Soil Science Hanxing Pu - Penn State University.

Download Presentation

Image based on photo by Peggy Greb, USDA ARS (Richard Lowrance in foreground)

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Presentation Transcript


Image based on photo by peggy greb usda ars richard lowrance in foreground

Accuracy Assessment Methods and Results for Two Satellite Imagery Derived Landcover and Landuse DatasetsRaymond Crew - GIS Researcher and MS CandidateRick L. Day - Associate Professor Soil ScienceHanxing Pu - Penn State University

Image based on photo by Peggy Greb, USDA ARS (Richard Lowrance in foreground)


Image based on photo by peggy greb usda ars richard lowrance in foreground

Part of a study to inventory the riparian land cover conditions for the Chesapeake Bay watershed

Highlighting accuracy assessment of a GIS based riparian land cover inventory

Introduction


Image based on photo by peggy greb usda ars richard lowrance in foreground

Largest estuary in the US

Watershed covers 178,000 km2 and contains 464,000 km of stream banks and shorelines

New York, Pennsylvania, Maryland, Delaware, Washington DC, West Virginia and Virginia

15 million residents growing to 18 million by 2020

The Chesapeake Bay Watershed


Image based on photo by peggy greb usda ars richard lowrance in foreground

Collaborative group coordinating efforts to protect the ecological health of the Chesapeake Bay. Formed in 1983.

Chesapeake Bay Commission

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

Maryland

Virginia

Pennsylvania

District of Columbia

Chesapeake Bay Program Office


Image based on photo by peggy greb usda ars richard lowrance in foreground

The Executive Council:

Governors of Maryland, Pennsylvania, and Virginia

Mayor of DC

Administrator of the EPA

Chair of the Chesapeake Bay Commission

Issued a directive in 1994 asking the Chesapeake Bay Program Office to increase the focus on riparian stewardship, especially riparian forest buffers

Chesapeake Executive Council Directive on Riparian Buffers


Image based on photo by peggy greb usda ars richard lowrance in foreground

Riparian buffers are area of vegetated land adjacent to streams, rivers, marshes or shorelines forming a transition between the land and water environments. (Vellidis and Lowrance, 2004) (Lowrance, Altier et. Al, 1995)

Both forests and wetlands are effective buffers (EPA, 2005)

What are riparian buffers

photo David J. Welsch USDA


Image based on photo by peggy greb usda ars richard lowrance in foreground

Reducing and Filtering Runoff

settles out sediments, nutrients and pesticides

increase infiltration rates

root systems stabilizing stream-banks and reduce erosion

Nutrient Uptake

increases absorption of fertilizers and other pollutants by storing bio-mass

de-nitrification via soil bacteria

Canopy and Shade

moderate stream temperatures

leaf canopy filtering dust from wind erosion

Habitat and Habitat Corridors

Why buffers are important


Image based on photo by peggy greb usda ars richard lowrance in foreground

Study Objectives

1.Develop an improved automated inventory method

  • Conduct an inventory for two time periods

  • Validate method to determine reliability

  • Study differences in buffer conditions by stream order

    5.Study environmental pressures associated with land-use surrounding the riparian zones


Automated inventory

Automated Inventory

  • Determine and collect the GIS datasets required for inventory acquire datasets

    • land-cover

    • streams and water body polygons

    • watershed divides

  • Calculate the inventory using an automated method

    • 100 and 300 foot buffers

    • stream miles – single sided and dual sided buffers

    • riparian miles


  • Streams and water body data

    Streams and Water Body Data

    • Hybrid dataset produced by the USGS and Chesapeake Bay Program Office

      • 1:24K Resolution National Hydrography Dataset (Higher Resolution NHD)

      • 1:24K Reach files produced by the CBPO


    Land cover data

    Land-cover Data

    • Original plan:

      • Have the Mid-Atlantic Regional Earth Science Applications Center (RESAC) produce a year 1990 and 2000 dataset using the same methods and type of imagery

      • Unfortunately only a year 2000 dataset was produced


    Land cover near dulles airport

    Land-cover Near Dulles Airport


    2000 land cover data

    2000 Land-cover Data

    • Based on three year 2000 satellite images

    • 30 meter resolution

    • 21 land-cover and use classes - 4 pertinent to this study

      • forest

      • urban forest

      • wetlands

      • water


    Solution

    Solution

    • Use the best available land-cover data available for the year 2000 and the year 1992

      • 2000

        • Use the RESAC landcover/landuse data

      • 1992

        • Use the Multi-Resolution Land Characteristics (MRLC) landcover data. Commonly called the NLCD


    1992 mrlc land cover data

    1992 MRLC Land-cover Data

    • 18 land-cover classes in the Chesapeake Bay - 3 pertinent to this study

      • forest

      • wetland

      • water

  • based on primarily early 1990’s satellite images, however, some imagery as old as 1985 was used

  • 30 meter resolution


  • Problems using these two datasets

    Problems Using These Two Datasets

    • Different Methods uses to derive land-cover categories

      • example: large differences between classification of open water vs. wetlands

  • No urban forest category in the NLCD as in the RESAC

    • unsure if urban forest will be classified as forest or as something else

  • NLCD based on a wider temporal range of images


  • The sampling process

    The Sampling Process

    • Splits streams into 300’ (91.44 m) segments

    • Orients a transect perpendicular to each stream segment at the center of the segment


    Image based on photo by peggy greb usda ars richard lowrance in foreground

    Algorithm Outputs

    • Establishes sampling locations every 50 feet (15.24 m) along the transect

    • Collects the land-cover informationfrom the satellite imagery at each sample location

    • Calculates buffer statistics for each watershed

      • Forest

      • Forest or urban forest

      • Forest, urban forest, or wetlands

      • Forest, urban forest, wetlands or water


    Image based on photo by peggy greb usda ars richard lowrance in foreground

    Riparian Buffer Algorithm

    • Stream Miles

      • One or more sides buffered 100 feet or more

      • One or more sides buffered 300 feet or more

      • Both sides buffered 100 feet of more

      • Both sides buffered 300 feet or more

    • Riparian Miles

      • Buffers of 100 feet or more

      • Buffers of 300 feet or more


    Image based on photo by peggy greb usda ars richard lowrance in foreground

    Statistics by State


    Image based on photo by peggy greb usda ars richard lowrance in foreground

    Statistics by Watershed


    Image based on photo by peggy greb usda ars richard lowrance in foreground

    Year 2000 Inventory

    Percent of streams with at least 100 feet of a forested buffer


    Image based on photo by peggy greb usda ars richard lowrance in foreground

    Validation Study

    • Need to validate automated inventory method versus a traditional method to generate buffer inventories

    • Must also test the reliability of land cover classifications in riparian zones

    • Must validate and changes shown between the 1992 and 2000 inventories


    Image based on photo by peggy greb usda ars richard lowrance in foreground

    Validation Study

    • Generate a forest land cover inventory using air photo interpretation

    • Compare each air photo inventory to the same year automated inventory

    • Compare the air photo inventories to each other


    Image based on photo by peggy greb usda ars richard lowrance in foreground

    Validation Study

    • Randomly selected 50 locations throughout Chesapeake Bay Watershed

    • Stratified to include all States and physiographic regions

    • Used Hawth’s Analysis Tools 2.1 for ArcGIS


    Image based on photo by peggy greb usda ars richard lowrance in foreground

    Acquire Air Photos

    • Purchase overlapping stereo sets of two or three photos from the National Aerial Photography Program (NAPP)

      • 9” by 9” prints grayscale prints

      • 1:40,000 scale

      • Flown every 5 to 7 years

      • Only $5 per print

    • Two or three photos cover ¼ of the extent a standard USGS topographic map


    Image based on photo by peggy greb usda ars richard lowrance in foreground

    Air Photos

    • Purchase two sets of photos, one centered near 2000 and the other near 1992

    • Had to remove NY, no photos available later than 1998


    Image based on photo by peggy greb usda ars richard lowrance in foreground

    Scanning Stereoscope

    • Used a scanning & magnifying stereoscope

    • All photos work by one individual, Hanxing Pu

    • His work compared for quality to another tech, Chihiro Mather


    Image based on photo by peggy greb usda ars richard lowrance in foreground

    Photo Work

    • Coded every visible stream bank and waterbody outline into four classes

      Red: Forest buffer exceeding 300’

      Blue: Forest buffer between 100’ and 300’

      Black: Forest buffer less than 100’

      Yellow: No buffer visible


    Image based on photo by peggy greb usda ars richard lowrance in foreground

    Digitizing

    • Next digitize all the buffers see via air photo work

    • Can only be accomplished for those steams seen on the air photos and those in the digital data

    • Any stream missing from one of the two sets is not compared


    Image based on photo by peggy greb usda ars richard lowrance in foreground

    Digitizing

    • Removed the automated method results from the datasets to prevent any bias


    Image based on photo by peggy greb usda ars richard lowrance in foreground

    Results


    Image based on photo by peggy greb usda ars richard lowrance in foreground

    Thanks to:

    • Dr. Anne Hairston-Strang – Maryland DNR Forest Service

    • J. Michael Foreman - Virginia Department of Forestry

    • Gene Odato - PA Bureau of Forestry

    • Sally Claggett - Chesapeake Bay Program Coordinator

    • Peter Claggett - Chesapeake Bay Program Office - USGS Land Data Manager

    • Dr. David Mortensen – Associate Professor of Weed Ecology

    • Dr. Doug Miller – Assistant Professor of Geography

    • Dr. Gary Petersen - Distinguished Prof of Soil Science


  • Login