Massachusetts School and District Accountability System                         2003 Mid-Cycle AYP D...
Download
1 / 23

State Report December 4, 2003 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 95 Views
  • Uploaded on

Massachusetts School and District Accountability System 2003 Mid-Cycle AYP Determinations. State Report December 4, 2003. Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) determinations are a tool for assessing the progress of our climb to higher levels of student achievement. 75.6.

loader
I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
capcha
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about ' State Report December 4, 2003' - amber-trujillo


An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript

Massachusetts School and District Accountability System 2003 Mid-Cycle AYP Determinations

State Report December 4, 2003


Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) determinations are a tool for assessing the progress of our climb to higher levels of student achievement.

75.6

A: Participation

60.8

B: Performance

C: Improvement

D: Attendance or

Graduation rate


Two Ways to Make AYP: assessing the progress of our climb to higher levels of student achievement.

Participation + Performance (A+B) = AYP

75.6

A: Participation

60.8

B:Performance

C:Improvement

D:Attendance or

Graduation rate

Participation + Improvement + Attendance or Graduation Rate (A+C+D) = AYP

or


How Did We Do in English Language Arts (ELA), Statewide, In 2003?

CPI 83.1

STATE ELA PERFORMANCETARGET, CYCLE III: 75.6

MCAS PARTICIPATION RATE: 99%

State ELA Results

All Students ( Aggregate )

Participation + Performance (A+ B) = AYP


State ELA Performance Results by Student Subgroup 2003?

White: 87.6

Asian/Pacific Is: 82.8

Native American: 78.0

Free/Red. Lunch: 68.8

African American/Black: 69.2

Special Ed: 63.2

Hispanic: 63.7

LEP: 52.1


Three Student Subgroups Made AYP in ELA Through Participation and Performance (A+B = AYP)

White: 87.6

Asian/Pacific Is: 82.8

Native American: 78.0

75.6

At or Above State Performance Target and Made State Participation Target


Three More Student Subgroups Made AYP in ELA Through Participation, Improvement, and Attendance

Free/Reduced Lunch

African American/Black

Special Education

At or Above State Participation Target and Subgroup’s Improvement and Attendance Targets

Participation + Improvement + Attendance (A+C+D) = AYP


State ELA Participation, Improvement, and AttendanceImprovement for Student Subgroups Performing Below State Performance Target

Free/Reduced Lunch: +4.8

African American/Black: + 4.5

Special Education: +4.1

Hispanic: +6.4

LEP: +20.1

All 5 Subgroups Met Their Group’s Improvement Target for 2003


State Participation, Improvement, and AttendanceAttendance Results by Student Subgroup

Asian/Pacific Is: 95.7

Limited English Proficient: 93.2

White: 94.4

Special Education: 92.5

African American /Black: 92.7

Free/Reduced Lunch: 92.4

Native American: 91.8

Hispanic: 91.7

Met Attendance Target

Did Not Meet Attendance Target


2003 MID-CYCLE REPORT Participation, Improvement, and Attendance

Two Student Subgroups Did Not Make AYP in ELA

Hispanic

LEP

LEP Students: Did not meet State’s 95% Participation Target

Hispanic Students: Did not meet their Attendance Target


STATE MATH PERFORMANCETARGET, CYCLE III: Participation, Improvement, and Attendance60.8

CPI 69.3

MCAS PARTICIPATION RATE: 99%

State Mathematics Results

All Students ( Aggregate )

How Did We Do in Math, Statewide, In 2003?

Participation + Performance (A+ B) = AYP


State MATH Performance Results by Student Subgroup Participation, Improvement, and Attendance

White: 77.5

Asian/Pacific Is: 74.5

Native American: 61.9

Free/Reduced Lunch 51.5

African American/Black: 49.2

Special Ed: 45.9

Hispanic: 46.7

LEP: 44.5


2003 MID-CYCLE REPORT Participation, Improvement, and Attendance

Three Student Subgroups Made AYP in Math Through Participation and Performance

Asian/Pacific Is: 77.5

White: 74.5

Native American: 61.9

At or Above State Performance Target and State Participation Target

Participation + Performance = AYP


State MATH Participation, Improvement, and AttendanceImprovement for Student Subgroups Performing Below State Performance Target

Free/Reduced Lunch: +4.8

African American/Black: + 4.5

Special Education: +4.1

Hispanic: +6.4

LEP: +20.1

All 5 Subgroups Met Their Group’s Improvement Target for 2003


2003 MID-CYCLE REPORT Participation, Improvement, and Attendance

Two More Student Subgroups Made AYP in Math Through Participation, Improvement, and Attendance

Free/Reduced Lunch

African American/Black

At or Above State Participation Targetand Met Subgroup’s Improvement and Attendance Targets

Participation + Improvement + Attendance = AYP


Statewide, Three Student Subgroups Did Not Make AYP in Math Participation, Improvement, and Attendance

Special Education Students: Performed below the State’s Performance Target and did not meet their group Improvement Target

LEP Students: Did not meet State’s Participation Target

Hispanic Students: Did not meet State’s Performance Target or the State Attendance Target


Massachusetts school districts results for students in the aggregate
Massachusetts School Districts Participation, Improvement, and AttendanceResults for Students in the Aggregate

Only 6% (14 districts) did not make AYP in ELA, Math or both Subjects for students in the aggregate


Results for student subgroups massachusetts school districts
Results for Student Subgroups Participation, Improvement, and AttendanceMassachusetts School Districts


District results for subgroups
District Results for Subgroups Participation, Improvement, and Attendance






ad