Loading in 5 sec....

Analysis of Message Sequence ChartsPowerPoint Presentation

Analysis of Message Sequence Charts

- 72 Views
- Uploaded on
- Presentation posted in: General

Analysis of Message Sequence Charts

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Analysis ofMessage Sequence Charts

Doron Peled

Univ. of Warwick

Bar Ilan University

Department of Computer ScienceUniversity of Warwick

- An ITU standard notation (Z120).
- Visual + Textual forms.
- Specifies behaviors of communication protocols.
- Existing algorithms + tools.

P1

P2

P3

M1

M2

M3

M4

M5

M6

msc MSC;

inst P1: process Root,

P2: process Root,

P3: process Root;

instance P1;

out M1 to P2;

in M5 from P2;

in M6 from P3;

endinstance;

instance P2;

in M1 from P1;

out M2 to P3;

out M3 to P3;

in M4 from P3;

out M5 to P1;

endinstance;

instance P3;

in M2 from P2;

in M3 from P2;

out M4 to P2;

out M6 to P1;

endinstance;

endmsc;

P1

P2

P3

M1

M2

M3

M4

M5

M6

M1

s

r

M2

s

r

P1

P2

P3

M1

M2

M3

s

M3

r

M4

s

M4

M5

r

M6

s

s

M5

M6

r

r

P1

P2

P3

P1

P2

P3

approve

connect

P1

P2

P3

P1

P2

P3

fail

req_service

report

An execution: infinite or maximal

A

B

Execution: ACACD

approve

connect

connect

fail

report

connect

fail

fail

Req_service

report

report

Req_service

C

D

- Sends before corresponding receives.
- Events on the same process line execute in order of appearance, from top to bottom.

- If some event (send, receive) is higher on the line than another, it comes first.
- Sends precede matching receives.

P1

P2

P3

M1

M2

M3

M4

M5

M6

M1

s

r

M2

s

P1

P2

P3

r

M1

M2

M3

M3

s

M4

r

M5

s

M4

M6

r

s

s

M5

M6

r

r

P1

P2

P3

M1

- Sends before matching receive.
- Receive or sends before sends of same process.
- Two receives on the same process sent from the same process.

M2

M3

M4

M5

M6

Races: check if every pair of events ordered by the visual order appears in the transitive closure of the causal order.

P1

P2

P3

P1

P2

P3

M1

M1

M2

M2

M3

M3

M4

M4

M5

M6

M6

M5

P1

P2

P3

M1

M2

M3

M4

M5

M6

Finding races:

P1

P2

P3

M1

M2

M3

M4

M5

Rules: order between

- receive and a later send.

- two sends from same process.

- send and corresponding receive.

-fifo order.

M6

M1

s

r

M2

s

r

P1

P2

P3

M1

M2

M3

s

M3

M4

r

M5

s

M4

M6

r

s

s

M5

M6

r

r

- Structure (E, R).
- E – Events, R E E.
- R* The transitive closure. Defined asfollows:a R*b if there is a sequencex1 x2 … xn where a=x1, b=xn,and xi R xi+1 for 1i<n.
- Complexity: cubic. In our case: quadratic (every event has 1 or 2 successors).

P1

P2

[2,4]

[3,5]

[7,10]

[2,3]

Use time differencematrices.

For each HMSC M execution Ex, define thelinearizations according to the visual orderlinvis(Ex) and the linearizations according to the causal order lincaus(Ex). Extend to all executions: linvis(Ex) and lincaus(Ex).

- Always linvis(Ex) lincaus(Ex).
- Races: when linvis(Ex) lincaus(Ex).

Alphabet {a,b,c}

Independence: aIb, bIc

Equivalence classes of words (denoted usingrepresentatives):[aabb]=[abba]

Regular trace language: can be defined usingconcatenation, star, union, intersection.

Note: [ab]* is not recognizable (by automata).

P1

P2

P3

connect

fail

report

connect

fail

report

connect

approve

A

B

P1

P2

P3

P1

P2

P3

approve

connect

P1

P2

P3

P1

P2

P3

fail

req_service

report

Execution: concatenation of a maximal path in the HMSC.

C

D

P1

P2

M1

M2

P1

P2

+

=?

What if one process will start to behave according to M1 and the other will start according to M2?

- Undecidable [MP99]
- Translate to language theory of traces, which are closed w.r.t. commuting certain pairs of letters.
- Intuition: moving from visual to causal semantic introduces more commutations:Two receives on the same process line (from different processes) are dependent on visual and independent on causal order.
- Reduction to universality of trace languages (things are independent with causal semantics).

Independent

Language L

Independent

Doron Peled (Bar Ilan, Warwick)

Joint work with:

- Edith Elkind, Jerusalem
- Blaise Genest, Rennes
- Paola Spoletini (Milano)

P1

P2

P3

P1

P2

P3

approve

connect

P1

P2

P3

P1

P2

P3

fail

req_service

report

P1

P2

P3

P1

P2

P3

approve

connect

Repeat 3 times

P1

P2

P3

P1

P2

P3

fail

req_service

report

P1

P2

P3

connect

fail

A

report

P1

P2

P3

connect

fail

connect

report

connect

approve

P1

P2

P3

fail

report

C

B

P1

P2

P3

approve

P1

P2

P3

req_service

Execution: concatenation of a maximal path in the HMSC.

D

Timeline

A

B

… (3 more)

Timeline

ApB

We can express \/ by juxtapositioning:

A pod B

)No need for conjunction)

o

d-1

o-1

p-1

d

s1

A

r1

B

s2

r2

Chain of messages between points A and B:Alternating sequence of send/receive events where receive and subsequent send are on same process.

(Causal cycle)

pp-1oo-1dd-1

o

P1

P2

P3

P1

P2

P3

Cannot have an edge from right to left!

Cannot have a chain of messages from orange to red message

pp-1oo-1dd-1

p

pod-1

po

poo-1dd-1

opd

pp-1oo-1dd-1

p

pod-1

po

Can easily determine case:Calculate transitive closure O(n2), then check the order between points.

poo-1dd-1

opd

p

<

o

<

d-1

<

d

<

o-1

<

p-1

P1

P2

P3

0

1

2

2

3

4

P1

P2

P3

Best

worst

Intuition: Red is assumed to appear before green. Count the number of inversions between end events of (s1,r1)(s2,r2).

When equal: based on who starts first

po

pp-1oo-1dd-1

p

pod-1

poo-1dd-1

opd

<

<

<

<

<

- For a pair of messages m1, m2 in HMSCpath: the worst “out of order” measure along the path.
- For a pair of messages in HMSC (in different MSCs, of course): the worst discord along any path.
- For an HMSC: the worst discord for any pair of messages.

poo-1dd-1

For path M1;M2, discord is p.

For path M1;M3;M1 discord is o-1 due to messages report and 2ndconnect.

For M3;M4 discord is d.

M2

M1

P1

P2

P3

P1

P2

P3

approve

connect

M3

M4

P1

P2

P3

P1

P2

P3

fail

req_service

report

- Calculating a discord between messages in HMSC is in CoNP-Complete.(Reduction from 3SAT).
- Calculating the discord of an HMSC is polynomial (nontrivial algorithm).

- Write a specification.
- Convert into MSC or LSC (e.g., Play in-Play out tool).
- Specify essential orders between certain messages.
- Check discords.
- Add synchronization messages to force unachieved order or
- Make objects of problematic message orders in same process.
- Parallelize the system according to the constraints in 5 and 6.

Visual notation have advantages over textual representation.

MSCs is a standard for describing concurrent interactions.

MSCs are based on partial order semantics.

MSCs raise many interesting research problems, e.g., race condition.

Discords allow expressing the migration order between messages.

Discords can be calculated to check for violation between intuitive order and actual order in LSC,HMSC.

Discords provides framework for synthesizing, then parallelizing algorithms.