1 / 15

The “Service layer” Issues for discussion

The “Service layer” Issues for discussion. Piero Castoldi, Fabio Baroncelli, Barbara Martini. WP4 NOBEL Meeting Stockholm, Sweden September 2 -3 , 2004. Outline. NGN efforts & recommendations Framing of the “Service Layer” within the NOBEL project Our view and open problems

amandla
Download Presentation

The “Service layer” Issues for discussion

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. The “Service layer”Issues for discussion Piero Castoldi, Fabio Baroncelli, Barbara Martini WP4 NOBEL Meeting Stockholm, Sweden September 2-3, 2004

  2. Outline NGN efforts & recommendations Framing of the “Service Layer” within the NOBEL project Our view and open problems Some conclusions Acknowledgements: comments received on the mailing list and privately from Massimo & Andrea, Monika, Bela, Lieven, Antonio.

  3. NGN efforts history • Study started in early 2001. As the result of coordination between ITU-T and ETSI, it was decided that ITU-T SG13 leads NGN study. • NGN discussion became more active in 2003. ITU-T SG13 set up JRG-NGN (Joint rapporteur group for NGN) to progress the work on NGN extensively. • At the meeting in June 2004, two fundamental Recommendations were consented: • Y.2001: NGN overview • Y.2011: General reference model for NGN • Other useful reference for terminology: Y.110 Source: http://www.aptsec.org/meetings/2004/WSNGN/ WS-DOC/ASTAP04-WS.NGN-08_ITU-T_Status-NTT-view.ppt

  4. Definition of NGN in Rec. Y.2001 • A packet-based network able to provide telecommunication services and able to make use of multiple broadband, QoS-enabled transport technologies and in which service-related functions are independent from underlying transport-related technologies • It supports generalized mobility which will allow consistent and ubiquitous provision of services to users. Source: http://www.aptsec.org/meetings/2004/WSNGN/ WS-DOC/ASTAP04-WS.NGN-08_ITU-T_Status-NTT-view.ppt

  5. Recommendation Y.2011 (1) • The service “thing” of NGN is not a plane, nor a layer, it is a “stratum” isomorphic to the well known transport stratum. • NGN service stratum provides the user functions that control and manage service resources to enable end-user services and application (as defined in D2?) that will be mapped into network services (as defined in D2?) • NGN transport stratum provides the user functions that transfer data, and functions that control and manage the transport resources to carry user data between terminating entities. • NGN management is the union of service stratum management plane and transport stratum management plane. The same applies for control plane..

  6. Recommendation Y.2011 (2) • Which functions belong to the service stratum and which to the transport stratum has to be identified. • Interfaces and/or reference points have to be identified. • Control functions • Control of services (user authentication and identification, service admission control, etc) • Control of transport (network admission control, network resource/policy control, etc) • Management functions • Management of services (configuration of service resources to be further studied according to Y.2011) • Management of transport (TMN management functions) [M.3050, M.3400] • Transport functions [G.805 and G.807] • Technology may be different but transport functions such as adaptation and trail termination are common to the transport planes of the two strata (same modeling) • Resources • Phyisical and non-physical (logical) components used to construct services (e.g. application modules) and networks (e.g. network segments) [Y.110]

  7. Early steps in NOBEL (1): “Service layer” in Client side Out of scope ! Access Network PPI Management Plane Management Plane UPI Access Network “Service layer” NMI-A NMI-A UNI E/I-NNI Control Plane Control Plane CCI NMI-T CCI NMI-T Transport Plane Transport Plane Network Provider Network Provider NOBEL Network

  8. Early steps in NOBEL (2): “Service layer”in Network Provider Positioning “Service layer” “Service layer” Access Network Access Network PPI Management Plane Management Plane NMI-A NMI-A E/I-NNI Control Plane Control Plane NMI-T CCI CCI NMI-T Transport Plane Transport Plane Network Provider Network Provider NOBEL Scope

  9. UPI Access network Access network NSI (?) UNI ? “Service Layer” = Service Stratum ? Early steps in NOBEL(3): Interfaces to/from “Service Layer” Management Plane NMI-A NMI-T Control Plane CCI Transport Plane ASTN = Transport Stratum NSI=Network to Service Interface Note: actual data channels not shown in the figure

  10. Application Network Access Network Access Network Application Network UPI UPI NSI NSI UNI “Service Layer” ? ? “Service Layer” UNI ? ? Access Network and Service Layer Management Plane PPI Management Plane NMI-A NMI NMI-A E/I-NNI Control Plane Control Plane NMI-T NMI-T CCI CCI Transport Plane Transport Plane Network Provider Network Provider NSI=Network to Service Interface Note: actual data channels not shown in the figure

  11. From Access Network to Application Network • A UPI/UNI (Call) Request: Access Network   Network Provider • L1-L3 VPN • With following main characteristics • Bandwidth allocation (possibly dynamic) • QoS level  which level of protection / restoration by which technologies • Technology-dependent at least within the layer • A NSI (Service) Request: Application Network   Network Provider • A pool of video on Demand sessions, an Internet access, etc. • With following sample characteristics • DiVx quality, DVD quality per video session • Internet Gold for large SME • Technology-independent but service dependent

  12. Is the Service Layer the NGN Service Stratum? Service Management Plane NSI-M (WP1&WP4 ?) ? (WP4) Application Network ?(WP1) Service Control Plane NSI-C (WP1 & WP4 ?) PPI Management Plane Management Plane ? (WP1) ?(WP1) ? (WP4) NMI-A NMI-A Service Transport Plane E/I-NNI Control Plane Control Plane NMI-T CCI NMI-T CCI “Service Layer”= Service Stratum= Service Provider Transport Plane Transport Plane Network Provider= Transport Stratum Network Provider= Transport Stratum NSI=Network to Service Interface Note: actual data channels not shown in the figure

  13. Possible functions of the Service Stratum entities • Service Management Plane (SMP) • It maintains the database of SLA, current service resource usage, access authorization • In general it is responsible of commercial aspects of service provisioning: service marketing, billing, usage and contractual obligations according to SLA • Centralized similarly to the MP of the Transport Stratum • Service Control Plane (SCP) • Dynamic aspects of service provisioning such as service discovery • Actual mapping of application requests into network services requests • Distributed similarly to the CP of the Transport Stratum • Service Transport Plane (STP) • Dummy separation related to the segment of transport belonging to the Service Stratum.

  14. New Interfaces related to “Service Stratum” • Internal interfaces (WP1?) • SMP SCP • SCP STP • SMP  STP • External interfaces (WP1/WP4?) • SMP MP • SCP CP • Application Network SMP (NSI-M) • Application Network  SCP (NSI-C)

  15. Conclusions Topic is borderline between WP1 and WP4. WP4 competence may be needed because the Service Stratum (Service Provider?) has the same structure of a Network Provider (TP, CP, MP). Identified a possible set of interfaces We must restrict our attention to what can be reasonably pursued within NOBEL scope and time span of the project.

More Related