Pradeep. K Mittal
This presentation is the property of its rightful owner.
Sponsored Links
1 / 37

Pradeep. K Mittal Member Central Council of PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 109 Views
  • Uploaded on
  • Presentation posted in: General

Pradeep. K Mittal Member Central Council of The Institute of Company Secretaries of India, New Delhi Corporate Lawyer & Advocate Delhi High Court, Delhi 9811044365/9911044365. POINTS TO BE KEPT IN MIND BEFORE DRAFTING COMMENCES. A) Whether any legal notice required; i) Section 433

Download Presentation

Pradeep. K Mittal Member Central Council of

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Presentation Transcript


Pradeep k mittal member central council of

Pradeep. K Mittal

Member Central Council of

The Institute of Company Secretaries of India, New Delhi

Corporate Lawyer &

Advocate

Delhi High Court, Delhi

9811044365/9911044365

POINTS TO BE KEPT IN MIND BEFORE DRAFTING COMMENCES


A whether any legal notice required i section 433 ii section 113 3 of the companies act 1956

A) Whether any legal notice required;

i) Section 433

ii) Section 113(3) of the

Companies Act, 1956


Pradeep k mittal member central council of

B) Whether all factual details have been taken out:

All previous Litigation if any before any court of law to examine as to what was the

stand taken by the party before that Court;

ii) All correspondence between the parties


Pradeep k mittal member central council of

iii) All evidence necessary for drafting

a) Affidavits from traders;

b) Annual Returns/Share Certificates;

c) Balance Sheets

d) Criminal complaints/cases against any

of the Respondents;

e) Agreement for sale of immoveable assets

f) Copies of Applications/Licenses;

g) Copies of Board Resolutions/Forms


Pradeep k mittal member central council of

iv) Instances of financial irregularity mis-management;

a) Sale of Property at a depressed

consideration;

b) Purchase of materials at a higher

apparent value;

c) Sale of goods to associate/concern

at a depressed consideration;

d) Acquisition of assets for personal use

by debiting cost to the companys a/c

e) Extending loans at zero interest to

sister/associate concerns and not

repaying the principal sum or interest

in time;.


Pradeep k mittal member central council of

v) Take out copies of Annual Returns Forms No. 32 and forms 5 & 2 from the Registrar of companies;

vi) Information available with the Govt Deptt can be sought from Under the right to Information Act.


Pradeep k mittal member central council of

C) Holding a meeting with the clients and do the cross- examination & ask as many as questions as you can?

D) Take out the photographs of relevant persons or articles;


Pradeep k mittal member central council of

E) FORMS OF PLEADINGS

a)From prescribed

b)Set brief description of each of the petitioner and respondents;

c)Narrate the Facts:

i) Determine points/Issues involved

ii) Set the facts on each of the points;


Pradeep k mittal member central council of

In the absence of pleadings, evidence, if any, produced by the parties cannot be considered and no party should be permitted to travel beyond its pleadings.

Ram Swarup Gupta Vs. Bishnu Narain Inter College AIR 1987 SC 1242

Hari chand Vs. Daulat Ram AIR 1987 SC 94


Pradeep k mittal member central council of

Every pleadings must have the facts and not law. It must state all the material facts - Order 6 Rule 2 CPC.

iii) Refer the documentary evidence on which you are relying upon, never re-produce the documents:


Pradeep k mittal member central council of

d) Never admit or confess on any points which may go against you.

e) Examine as to whether the case being set out should not be contrary to documents being filed by you;


Pradeep k mittal member central council of

F) Legal clauses / Submission::

a)Cause of action

b)Limitation:

c)Jurisdiction:

d)No previous legal proceedings on same issue;

e)Prayer


Pradeep k mittal member central council of

f)Signing of petition on behalf of company Authorization by the company in favour of MD, Director or Company Secretary, Order 29 CPC.

g) If the petitioner is a company, then Board Resolution resolving to file petition must be filed. Similarly, if the petitioner is either a Trust or Society, Firm, then a resolution resolving to file a petition and authorizing an officer to sign, verify and file the petition must be annexed along with the petition.


Pradeep k mittal member central council of

h)The Director, by virtue of their office, are not entitle to file a case Apple Valley Resorts Vs. H P Estate Electricity Board 2003 (48) SCL 680

i)Himachal Pradesh) Raghuvir Paper Mills Vs. India Securities Ltd 2000 Corporate Law Cases 436.

j) Verification / Affidavit Petition to be supported by an affidavit Order 6 Rule 15 CPC. The Affidavit must be on Stamp Paper and notorized preferably before Oath Commissioner.


G documents to be attached

G) DOCUMENTS TO BE ATTACHED

a)Memorandum & Articles of Association duly amended:

b)Copy of latest Audited Balance Sheet:

c)Correspondence / Agreement / documents relied upon


Pradeep k mittal member central council of

d) DD payable towards court fees;

e)Paper Book with index duly page numbered;

f) Proof of Service of petition with respective authorities like RD or ROC wherever necessary;

- Documents to be attached.

- Signature upon the pleadings order 6 Rule 14 CPC.

- Party

- Pleader


Written statement

Written Statement

H)Preliminary Objection

a)Limitation Section 3 of Limitation Act;

To decide as a Preliminary Issue Official Trustee Vs. Sachinda Nath chaterjee AIR 1969 SC 823.


Pradeep k mittal member central council of

It is mandatory for any suit to dismiss any petition, appeal or application if filed after the period of limitation.

Ashok Kr Khurana Vs. Steelman Industries 2000 (85) DLT 398 Delhi DB


Pradeep k mittal member central council of

b) Improper affidavit Order 6 Rule 15 CPC

c) Not maintainable Section 9 CPC

d) Barred by Law

- Section 8 of Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996

e) Jurisdiction

f) Resjudicata Section 11 CPC-

Nazim Ali Vs. Anjuman Islamia

1993 (3) SCC 91.


Reply on merits order 8

Reply on Merits Order 8

I.Give Brief Background:

a) Formation of company;

b) Contribution of Respondents

in terms of capital, loans, personal

guarantees, mortgage/hypothecation

assets by Respondent, non-drawal of

salary

c) Day to day management with respondents;


Pradeep k mittal member central council of

d) Give historical background of Petitioner in terms of finances, business and personal dealings

II) Specific denials of the averments made in petition Order 8 Rule 5 CPC.

Every allegation of fact in the plaint if not denied specifically or by necessary implication, the averments/pleadings shall be taken to be admitted Order and Rule 5. Aravali Leasing Limited Vs. United Bottles Ltd 1998 CCC Page 584


Pradeep k mittal member central council of

Evasive denial is no denial Lohia Properties (P) Ltd. Vs. Atma Ram Kumar 1993 JT (Vol.5) 223 Raj Bahadur Sharma Vs. Union Of India 1998 (9) SCC page 458.

Evasion and unspecific denial is no denial and is in fact admission and no further proof is necessary for the party to lead: Rajiv Saluja Vs. Bharatia Industries DCLR 2002 (II) Delhi 46


Pradeep k mittal member central council of

III) After Denial, set out your own case and attach copies of documents, evidence and paper relied upon in support of your own case;


Oral written arguments

ORAL/WRITTEN ARGUMENTS

a)As a general rule, a petitioner is bound by his pleadings and should not be allowed to set up a case absolutely new case. Omprabha Jain Vs. Abnash Chand AIR 1968 SC 1083

1.Select first the point on which there is least dispute.

2.Arguments before the Judges are not the same as platform oratory. The force of an argument lies in the reasons behind it.


Pradeep k mittal member central council of

3. Facts should be stated with clearness, directness, and never with dullness. No beating about the bush.

4. It is the soundness of evidence and not eloquence that wins the cases;

5. Avoid abusive and impeterate language. It never pays;


Pradeep k mittal member central council of

6.Make your own case by your own sides evidence. At the same time, weakness of the other sides evidence to be highlighted.

7. Take out the entire law, Law dictionary, Legal Maxim,


Pradeep k mittal member central council of

8.Take out Govt Circulars, Clarifications Answers to frequently Asked Questions published by the Department; The Circular binds the Deptt but not quasi-judicial authority They can always different view.

9. Never try to confuse the Judge but only opposite counsel.


Written arguments

Written Arguments:

a)First find out the issues involved in the case:

b)On each issue , set out cases

c)Oral or documentary evidence led by both the parties;


Pradeep k mittal member central council of

d) Critical analysis of the evidence with the provisions of India Evidence Act;

e) Case applicable

f) Conclusions:


Important points

Important points

i) Court should not set up a case which was never presented by the parties. Sheodhari Vs. Suraj Prasad AIR 1954 SC 758.

ii) Frauds avoids all judicial acts including judgments and decree. Even judgment or decree passed by court, in pursuance of practice of fraud, could be set aside and recalled by any lower court or superior court. S.P Chengalvarya Naidu Vs. Jagannath 1994 (1) SCC 1.


Pradeep k mittal member central council of

IMPORTANTS JUDGEMENTS

Creation of a new majority is an act of oppression. Needle Industries (I) Ltd Vs. Needle Industries Newey (I) Holding Ltd 1981(3)SCC 333.

There must be continuous acts of oppression on the part of majority shareholders continuing up to the date of petition. Kalinga Tubes Vs. Shanti Prasad Jain AIR 1965 SC 1535.


Pradeep k mittal member central council of

The CLB, while dismissing the petition, however, to do substantial justice ordered for purchase of shares of petition valuation to be done before sale of immoveable property petitioner to quit. Surendra Goyal Vs. Nile Aqua Faucets (P) Ltd 2008(83)CLA 383(CLB).

In a petition under Section 397, The court can grant the remedy only if proved facts would justify passing of winding up order on the ground that it is just and equitable. Westfort Hi Tech Hospital Ltd Vs. V S Krishnan others 2007 (78)CLA (Kerala DB).


Pradeep k mittal member central council of

In petition under Section 397 and 399 of the Companeis act, 1956, the Company Law Board may direct the (i) Respondents directors to restore the funds so siphoned off to the company (ii) appointment of independent director (iii) declaring appointment of directors as illegal (iv) restoring the directorship of those directors who have been illegally removed. Ramesh Chander Bammi Vs. Pindi Roadlinks (P) Ltd 2007 (81) CLA 97 CLB.


Pradeep k mittal member central council of

Single instance of allotment of shares with a view to disturb the shareholding between the two groups would entitle him to file petition under Section 397 even in Section 25 ompany. ABP (P) Ltd Vs. United News of India 2008(83)CLA 408(CLB).

An Act beneficial to a company cannot be set aside. Shiv Nath Rai Bajaj Vs. Nafabs India (P) Ltd 2001(45)CLA 404.


Pradeep k mittal member central council of

In a petition for oppression and mismanagement, after giving of consent by members, if the consent is withdrawn and the remaining petitioner fell below 10%, the petition would not be maintainable. However, the petition would be maintainable only if, after filing of petition, the Company issues Bonus Shares or there is a reduction of paid-up share capital and the holding of Petitioner is reduced below 10%. Ajit Kumar Gupta Vs.. Company Law Board 2008 (82) CLA 1 (Allahabad.


Pradeep k mittal member central council of

The CLB set aside allotment of shares co deprived off of funds, petitioner to now funds for allotment of shares or long term funds to the company company now not deprived of working capital. ABP(P) Ltd Vs. United News of India 2008(83)CLA 408 CLB.

The Directorial complaints not to be agitated unless company is closely held, quasi-partnership. Karedia Suryanarayana Vs. Sri Ramdas Motor Transport Ltd 1999(35) CLA 117 CLB


Pradeep k mittal member central council of

Thank You


  • Login