Slide1 l.jpg
This presentation is the property of its rightful owner.
Sponsored Links
1 / 28

UPDATE ON MEDICARE’S REPORTING REQUIREMENTS SC Self-Insurers Association, Inc. General Membership Meeting November 4, 2010 Daniel W. Hayes, Esquire PowerPoint PPT Presentation

  • Uploaded on
  • Presentation posted in: General

UPDATE ON MEDICARE’S REPORTING REQUIREMENTS SC Self-Insurers Association, Inc. General Membership Meeting November 4, 2010 Daniel W. Hayes, Esquire. Updates since April 21-23, 2010 Members Only Forum: Various Alerts issued by CMS

Download Presentation

UPDATE ON MEDICARE’S REPORTING REQUIREMENTS SC Self-Insurers Association, Inc. General Membership Meeting November 4, 2010 Daniel W. Hayes, Esquire

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Presentation Transcript

Slide1 l.jpg


SC Self-Insurers Association, Inc.

General Membership Meeting

November 4, 2010

Daniel W. Hayes, Esquire

Slide2 l.jpg

  • Updates since April 21-23, 2010 Members Only Forum:

    • Various Alerts issued by CMS


    • U.S. v. Stricker decision (filed September 30, 2010)

Slide3 l.jpg


  • Section 111 of the Medicare, Medicaid, and SCHIP Extension Act of 2007

    • Section 111 of the MMSEA

      • What is the SCHIP?

        • “ State Children’s Health Insurance Program”

    • Purpose?

      • Safeguard against shifting burden for ongoing medical care from primary payer to Medicare

      • Section 111 is in addition to other MSP provisions (MSA allocation, etc.)

    • We’re interested in how it impacts Non-Group Health Plans (NGHPs)

Slide4 l.jpg

  • What is reportable?

    • Settlements, judgments, and awards to Medicare recipients:

      • Because Medicare recipient, likelihood of:

        • conditional (past) medical payments and

        • Obligation for future medical payments (must consider MSA allocation, but reviewable by CMS only if amount of settlement > $25,000)

      • Applies if TPOC (Total Payment Obligation to Claimant) exists on or after 10/01/10

        • In general, TPOC = date settlement is signed, award/judgment filed

      • Also applies if ORM (Ongoing Responsibility for Medicals) exists on or after 01/01/10

    • What about mass torts, class actions settlements? (See U.S. v. Stricker)

Slide5 l.jpg

  • Refresher:

  • CMS Memo: March 29, 2010

    • “Revised Implementation Timeline”

    • Two categories:

    • (1) Group Health Plan (GHP)

    • (2) Non-GHP, or NGHP

      • Liability Insurance (including Self-Insurance), No-Fault Insurance, and Workers’ Compensation

Slide6 l.jpg

  • CMS Memo: March 29, 2010 (cont’d)

    • “Revised Implementation Timeline”

    • “Claim Input File” testing 01/01/10 – 12/31/10

    • System will go “live” 01/01/11

      • All initial claims must be submitted 01/01/11 to 03/31/11 according to assigned timeframes for RRE’s (Responsible Reporting Entities)

Slide7 l.jpg

  • CMS Memo: April 6, 2010

    • Collection of HICNs, SSNs, and EINs

    • HICN: Medicare Health Insurance Claim Number

    • SSN: Social Security Number

    • EIN: Tax Identification Number (actually Employer Identification Number)

    • Collection of this information is proper for purposes of compliance with reporting requirements under Section 111

Slide8 l.jpg


  • New MMSEA 111 Alerts since the Members Only Forum

    • May 27, 2010

    • June 14, 2010

Slide9 l.jpg

  • MMSEA 111 Alert: 05/27/10

    • Alert for RRE’s of Liability Insurance (Including Self-Insurance), No-Fault Insurance, and Workers’ Compensation

    • RRE does not report regularly scheduled periodic payments, pursuant to statute, for obligation other than medical expenses

      • (Ex) weekly TTD; weekly payment of permanency award

      • But must separately report ORM (Ongoing Responsibility for Medicals)

      • Periodic “indemnity only” payments raises inference of ORM

      • Periodic payments not reported as TPOC (Total Payment Obligation to Claimant)

Slide10 l.jpg

  • MMSEA 111 Alert: 06/14/10

    • RRE ID Accountability and Other Registration Material

      • What to do if RRD creates ID’s unintentionally

      • Each RRE ID requires full compliance

      • Use of agent by RRE

      • Changing information for RRE with COBC (Coordination of Benefits Contractor)

Slide11 l.jpg


  • New NGHP (Non-Group Health Plan) Alerts since Members Only Forum

    • May 25, 2010

    • May 26, 2010 (x 3)

    • September 16, 2010

Slide12 l.jpg

  • NGHP Alert: 05/25/10

    • New Direct Data Entry (DDE) Option for NGHP

    • Available for “Small Reporters”

      • RRE who expects to have only an occasional claim report to make

      • May only submit 500 or less claim reports per calendar year

      • If injured party’s information does not match a Medicare beneficiary, counts toward the 500 claims limit (essentially like a “51” disposition code)

      • DDE reporting may begin 01/03/11

      • No testing will be required

Slide13 l.jpg

  • NGHP Alert: 05/26/10 (#1)

    • Revision to 02/24/10 Alert

    • Includes that entities with insurance plan with deductible are no longer required to report

      • Reported by entities’ insurer

      • Self-insured entities must continue to report

      • Whether TPA is considered RRE

        • Generally, NO

          • But see, state’s Assigned Claims Fund

        • Different under GHP arrangements, where TPA is the RRE

Slide14 l.jpg

  • NGHP Alert: 05/26/10 (#2)

    • Risk Management Write-Offs for NGHPs

    • “reduction in the amount due as a risk management tool” constitutes liability self-insurance for purposes of Medicare Secondary Payer provisions

    • Intended by risk management to lessen probability of liability claim against it or facilitate/enhance good will

      • Provider reduces or W/O portion of charge to Medicare

      • Provide property of value to Medicare beneficiary where reasonable to expect will seek medical care

Slide15 l.jpg

  • NGHP Alert: 05/26/10 (#3)

    • Clinical Trials & NGHPs

    • If payments are made by sponsors of clinical trials for complications or injuries arising out of the trials, considered payment by liability insurance (including self-insurance)

      • Must be reported

Slide16 l.jpg

  • NGHP Alert: 09/16/10

    • Further definition of “Small Reporter” for purpose of Direct Data Entry (DDE)

    • Registration overview for DDEs

    • Further considerations for DDEs

Slide17 l.jpg

  • United States of America v. James J. Stricker, et al.

    • “Memorandum Opinion Granting Certain Defendants’ Motions to Dismiss”

    • Filed with U.S. District Court N.D. of Alabama, 09/30/10

    • FN 1: “Not all defendants filed motions to dismiss. The court does not presume to know why . . . .”

      • “Accordingly, the decision set forth in this Memorandum Opinion and accompanying Order does not apply to those Defendants.”

Slide18 l.jpg

  • U.S. v. Stricker


    • 2003 underlying class action tort settlement

      • Monsanto Company and its predecessors produced PCB’s (Polychlorinated biphenyls) at a chemical manufacturing plant one mile west of downtown Anniston, AL

      • The EPA determined PCB exposure could cause health dangers including cancer, decreased fertility, still births, and birth defects

      • 1000’s of toxic-tort actions filed in Alabama against Monsanto and predecessor companies

Slide19 l.jpg

  • U.S. v. Stricker

    • All cases were consolidated in both Alabama state and federal courts

    • Global settlement reached on 08/20/03

      • $300 million

      • Involved combined total of more than 20,500 people

      • $275K placed in Court trust; remainder to be paid in annual installments through 2013

      • Conditions to release:

        • Funds released into attorney-maintained trust once 75% of adult plaintiffs signed releases

        • Could be disbursed to plaintiffs once court approved all minor settlements and 97% of releases signed

Slide20 l.jpg

  • U.S. v. Stricker

    • Department of Justice filed suit 12/01/09 against plaintiff attorneys and defendant corporations/insurance carriers under Medicare Secondary Payer statute

    • Alleged 907 unnamed recipients also received Medicare payments for unidentified medical expenses related to PCB contamination

    • (Some) defendants filed Motion to Dismiss based upon statute of limitations

Slide21 l.jpg

  • U.S. v. Stricker

    • Issues for Court:

    • (1) What SOL applies to each class of defendants (corporate defendants, plaintiff attorneys)?

    • (2) When did the government’s cause of action accrue for each class of defendants?

Slide22 l.jpg

  • U.S. v. Stricker

    • MSPA does not include a SOL

    • Parties agreed SOL under the “Federal Claims Collection Act” would apply

      • 3 years if founded upon tort;

      • 6 years if founded upon contract

Slide23 l.jpg

  • U.S. v. Stricker

    • Corporate Defendants:

    • No express contract between government and corporate defendants

    • Any reimbursement duties based solely on MSP statute

    • Liability, if any, arises out of defendants’ liability in tort settlement

      • “But for” the tort liability, no liability for reimbursement

      • So, 3 year statute of limitations applies under tort

Slide24 l.jpg

  • U.S. v. Stricker

    • When did government’s cause of action accrue against corporate defendants?

    • Court focused on determining at what point did defendants’ responsibility to pay arise in relation to the underlying class-action settlement

    • For corporate defendants, accrued on date settlement agreement executed and approved by Court on 08/20/03

      • So even if 6 year SOL applied, government lawsuit filed 12/01/09 would have been barred

Slide25 l.jpg

  • U.S. v. Stricker

    • Plaintiff Attorneys:

    • Conceded 6-year statute of limitations based upon contractual nature of attorney fees received from their clients

    • So, issue is when did government’s cause of action accrue against plaintiff attorneys?

Slide26 l.jpg

  • U.S. v. Stricker

    • Government argued no responsibility to pay arose until 12/02/03, when all minor settlements were approved by court, 97% of plaintiffs had signed releases, and funds could be disbursed

      • DOJ lawsuit filed 12/01/09---one day prior to 6 years later

      • Settlement was “conditional”

    • The Court did not agree

      • 97% certification was “condition subsequent” to contract

      • Did not affect overall enforceability of settlement agreement

Slide27 l.jpg

  • U.S. v. Stricker

    • Government’s right to intervene against plaintiff’s attorneys accrued no later than 10/29/03, when funds transferred from Court into attorneys’ escrow account

      • Lawsuit filed against plaintiff attorneys on 12/01/09 barred by 6-year SOL

Slide28 l.jpg

  • Why is U.S. v. Stricker important?

    • Provides framework for calculating government’s statute of limitations for filing lawsuits to collect reimbursement

    • When applied in context of mandatory reporting requirements, may be able to calculate either 3-year or 6-year SOL’s based upon date of Total Payment Obligation of Claimant (TPOC), or when settlement agreement is signed (or award/judgment filed)

      • Likely 3-year SOL applicable to corporate defendants/carriers

      • Likely 6-year SOL applicable to plaintiff attorneys

    • Shows the government can be defeated on MSP lawsuits (but not over yet . . . )

  • Login