Environmental attitudes and behaviour in canada common ground or a rural urban divide
This presentation is the property of its rightful owner.
Sponsored Links
1 / 20

Environmental attitudes and behaviour in Canada: Common Ground or a Rural-Urban Divide? PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 73 Views
  • Uploaded on
  • Presentation posted in: General

Environmental attitudes and behaviour in Canada: Common Ground or a Rural-Urban Divide?. Emily Huddart, Solange Nadeau, Bonita McFarlane and Tom Beckley. Background and purpose. Long history of research on environmental attitudes. Much less research on environmental behaviour

Download Presentation

Environmental attitudes and behaviour in Canada: Common Ground or a Rural-Urban Divide?

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Presentation Transcript


Environmental attitudes and behaviour in canada common ground or a rural urban divide

Environmental attitudes and behaviour in Canada:Common Ground or a Rural-Urban Divide?

Emily Huddart, Solange Nadeau, Bonita McFarlane and Tom Beckley


Background and purpose

Background and purpose

  • Long history of research on environmental attitudes. Much less research on environmental behaviour

  • Historical disconnect between environmental attitudes (positive) and environmental behaviour.

    • Little evidence that people were acting on their espoused concern for the environment.

    • Question was seldom asked.


Background and purpose1

Background and purpose

  • The early work on environmental attitudes suggested urban people had more pro-environmental attitudes.

  • Work that eventually tackled environmental behaviour also suggested urban folks had more pro-environmental behaviour

  • Virtually all of this work done in U.S.

    • Is Canada different?


Research questions

Research questions

  • Do urban residents express more pro-environmental attitudes?

  • Do urban residents practice more pro-environmental behaviour?

  • In today’s mobile society, does residence during socialization (prior to age 18) play a larger role in PEA and PEB than current residence?


Operating hypothesis

Operating hypothesis

  • There will be little to no difference between rural and urban residents in PEB if a broader and more “fair” set of measures are used.

  • Why?

  • Mobility (more people not living where they grew up)

  • Homogeneity of culture (similar exposure to mass culture)

  • Rural PEB was always there, it just looks different.


Key concepts

Key concepts

  • Social psychological variables

    • Pro-environmental behaviour

      • Behaviour that has a positive impact on Earth’s systems and natural resources

        • Public, Private, and Conservation-sphere PEB

  • Methodological wrinkle – The residence variable

    • Values are assumed to be formed through socialization (focus until 18th birthday)

      • Urban and rural settings may offer different environments for socialization


Key concepts1

Key concepts

  • Social psychological variables

    • Basic values

      • The set of standards/principles that guide our lives

        • Egoistic, Altruistic, Traditional

    • Environmental beliefs

      • Judgement and mental acceptance of the validity of a situation, statement or object

    • Environmental attitude

      • Evaluation that predisposes an individual to react consistently positively or negatively to a situation, statement or object


Cognitive hierarchy model

Pro-environmentalBehaviour

EnvironmentalAttitude

Demographics

Environmental Beliefs

Basic Values

Cognitive hierarchy model


Causal model peb

Causal model: PEB

Traditional Values

Environmental Attitude

Private-sphere PEB

Male

Altruistic Values

Education

Conservation-sphere PEB

Age

Residence

Egoistic Values

Public-sphere PEB

Environmental Beliefs


The survey

The survey…

  • Mail survey

  • Addresses provided by a marketing firm

  • Rural/Urban status based on Statistic Canada Rural Small Town definition (by postal code designation)

  • Overall 34.7% response rate


Measurement

Measurement

  • Basic values

    • 15 items; shortened Schwartz Values Inventory (Stern et al. 1998)

  • Environmental beliefs

    • 15 items; New Ecological Paradigm scale (revised version from Dunlap et al. 2000)

  • Environmental attitude

    • Priority of environment in daily life


Measurement1

Measurement

  • Pro-environmental behaviour

    • Consumptive & stewardship behaviour

      • Turn out lights, conserve water, carpool

      • Frequency of involvement in habitat restoration, tree planting

      • Use of environmental services (e.g. recycling, public transit, community garden, composting subsidies)

      • Challenge = separating environmental motivations from simple frugality

    • Activist behaviour

      • Write politicians, sign petitions, attend meetings, financially support ENGOs


Measurement2

Measurement

  • Residence

    • Categories: Remote, rural, adjacent to urban or urban area (definitions were provided):

    • What type of place respondent lived:

      • Until their 18th birthday

      • Most of their adult life

      • Their current residence


Residence

Residence

  • High correlation between

    • “Most of your life” category and “Until your 18th”

    • “Most of your life” category and “Current”

  • Creation of Residence Continuum:

    • Rural-socialized\Currently rural resident

    • Rural-socialized\Currently urban resident

    • Urban-socialized\Currently rural resident

    • Urban-socialized\Currently urban resident


Respondent profile

Respondent profile


Key results

Key results

  • Pro-environmental behaviour

    • Public-sphere: generally low engagement

      • Lower for Rural/Rural

      • Highest for Urban/Rural

    • Private and Conservation-spheres: generally high engagement

      • No statistically significant differences for Private-sphere PEB

      • Currently rural residents have statistically significantly higher Conservation-sphere PEB


Key results1

Key results

  • Environmental Attitude

    • Fairly high for all, no significant differences

  • Basic Values

    • Altruistic and traditional values: no significant differences

    • Egoistic values: Urban/Rural significantly lower than Urban/Urban


Conclusions

Conclusions

  • Availability of infrastructure plays a key role in engagement in Private and Conservation-sphere PEB

  • Rural citizens do not practice lower levels of PEB, as has been previously thought

    • Currently rural citizens practice more Conservation-sphere PEB

    • Private-sphere PEB does not differ between residence categories


Conclusions1

Conclusions

  • Residence doesn’t play a very important role in the determination of environmental behaviour

    • Little difference in values and attitude (ex. Urban/Rural have lower egoistic values than Urban/Urban)

    • Differences in environmental beliefs are mostly due to lower levels of education in rural areas

  • Current residence is more important than past residence in determining engagement in PEB

    • Has more to do with available PEB infrastructure and possibilities than with socialization and attitudes.

    • What you do for PEB is more a function of what it makes sense to do given where you are.


Conclusion

Conclusion

  • Rural residents are no more or less pro-environment than urban residents.

  • Rural environmentalism expresses itself in a different way, through different actions.


  • Login