1 / 17

Content and telecom pricing in history and in the war for eyeballs

Content and telecom pricing in history and in the war for eyeballs. Andrew Odlyzko Digital Technology Center University of Minnesota http://www.dtc.umn.edu/~odlyzko. growing opportunities for fine-grained charging and price strong public opposition limits deployment of such practices

alpha
Download Presentation

Content and telecom pricing in history and in the war for eyeballs

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Content and telecom pricing in history and in the war for eyeballs Andrew Odlyzko Digital Technology Center University of Minnesota http://www.dtc.umn.edu/~odlyzko

  2. growing opportunities for fine-grained charging and price strong public opposition limits deployment of such practices bundling, flat rates, ..., and especially personalized bundles offer a compromise that conceals sellers’ motivation and practices Main points:

  3. Underlying trends: • incentives to price discriminate are increasing • technology to price discriminate is improving • privacy will be victim, since it inhibits price discrimination Price discrimination likely to be most notable feature of The New Economy

  4. [Alexander Graham] Bell should have anticipated Bill [Gates] and let someone else put in the phone infrastructure while he collected by the minute and distance (and even importance of the call if he could have figured a wait to monitor it) in perpetuity. email from Warren Buffett to Jeff Raikes of Microsoft, Aug. 21, 1997 Open architecture vs. driveto price according to value:

  5. 18th Century: Beverley Beck Navigation Cargo Toll per Ton Sand 2p Timber, stone, salt 6p Iron and lead 12p There is extensive evidence that such practices often aid society’s welfare, in accordance with standard economic doctrine.

  6. “Frictionless capitalism” vs. reality: Dell Latitude L400 ultra light laptop listed at $2,072.04, $2,228, and $2,307 on Dell Web pages (designed for state and local governments, small businesses, and health-care companies, respectively). Wall Street Journal June 8, 2001

  7. What will consumers accept?

  8. Origins of government intrusion in U.S. business: The demands that brought the first permanent regulatory commission to the United States resulted directly from the railroads’ discriminatory pricing policies. Alfred Chandler, Jr. The Railroads: The Nation’s First Big Business, 1965

  9. Fundamental problems: How to reconcile incentives to price discriminate with public loathing of such practices Warning: better data collection and analysis tools are becoming available to customers

  10. Other ways to skin the cat (other than explicit price discrimination: Microsoft Office (for Windows 3.11) components: Access $225 Excel $225 PowerPoint $225 Word $175 Total: $850 Office Pro bundle: $389

  11. Site licensing: # employees value 900 $ 0 10 $ 10 10 $ 20 10 $ 30 10 $ 40 10 $ 50 10 $ 60 10 $ 70 10 $ 80 10 $ 90 10 $100 1000 employees Sales to individuals: optimal price either $50 or $60 revenue = $3,000 Site licensing: revenue = $5,500

  12. Consumers’ willingness to pay more for simple pricing: What was the biggest complaint of AOL users? Not the widely mocked and irritating blue bar that appeared when members downloaded information. Not the frequent unsolicited junk e-mail. Not dropped connections. Their overwhelming gripe: the ticking clock. Users didn’t want to pay by the hour anymore. Case had heard from one AOL member who insisted that she was being cheated by AOL’s hourly rate pricing. When he checked her average monthly usage he found that she would be paying AOL more under the flat-rate price of $19.95. When Case informed the user of that fact, her reaction was immediate. ‘I don’t care,’ she told an incredulous Case. ‘I am being cheated by you.’ from aol.com: How Steve Case Beat Bill Gates, Nailed the Netheads, and Made Millions in the War for the Web, Kara Swisher, 1998.

  13. Increasing usage as key imperative: AO, “Tragic loss of good riddance: The impending demise of traditional scholarly journals,” 1994: predicted that pay-per-view in scholarly communication doomed to fail because of the deterrents of usage charges [Elsevier’s] goal is to give people access to as much information as possible on a flat fee, unlimited use basis. [Elservier’s] experience has been that as soon as the usage is metered on a per-article basis, there is an inhibition on use or a concern about exceeding some budget allocation. K. Hunter of Elsevier, 2000

  14. Flat rates as a way to stimulate usage:

  15. Network effects: Although about three million computers get sold every year in China, people don’t pay for the software. Someday they will, though. And as long as they’re going to steal it, we want them to steal ours. They’ll get sort of addicted, and then we’ll somehow figure out how to collect sometime in the next decade. Bill Gates, 1998

  16. Expect continued tension between drive to price discriminate and public opposition Flat rates and bundling (ideally personal bundles) a compromise that conceals seller practices Expect spectrum of practices, with expensive and infrequently purchased goods subject to sophisticated pricing, inexpensive and frequently used ones covered by simple (flat rate in extreme cases) plans Conclusions:

  17. Further data, discussions, and speculations in papers and presentation decks at: http://www.dtc.umn.edu/~odlyzko

More Related