1 / 24

ECENA Study Tour – Copenhagen 19 nd June 2006 Environmental inspection system in Denmark Gudmund Nielsen, DEPA

ECENA Study Tour – Copenhagen 19 nd June 2006 Environmental inspection system in Denmark Gudmund Nielsen, DEPA. Environmental administrative system The Environmental Protection Act Environmental inspectors work Minimum frequencies for inspection

alma
Download Presentation

ECENA Study Tour – Copenhagen 19 nd June 2006 Environmental inspection system in Denmark Gudmund Nielsen, DEPA

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. ECENA Study Tour – Copenhagen 19nd June 2006Environmental inspection system in DenmarkGudmund Nielsen, DEPA • Environmental administrative system • The Environmental Protection Act • Environmental inspectors work • Minimum frequencies for inspection • Planning and prioritising inspection (differentiated inspection) • Benchmarking of inspectorates

  2. The Environmental Protection System in Denmark • contact to parliament • statutory orders • circulars MINISTER ENVIRONMENTAL APPEAL BOARD 80 pers. Second instance of appeal DANISH ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY (DEPA) • advising the Minister • preparation of bills • instructions and guidance • instance of appeal • marine environment • chemicals • summary of environmental conditions • investigations • international work 285 pers. 275 MUNICIPALITIES 14 COUNTIES • most industrial plants (app. 80.000) & all • griculture (70.000 animal farms) – inspec- • tion and approval • county plants • neighbour complaints • waste (collection, treatment and depositing) • wastewater cleaning • drinking water • local planning • 2.700 most environmental complicated • industrial plants - inspection and • approval • municipal plants • monitoring environment • mapping groundwater resources • chemical waste sites • nature conservation • regional planning 1.000 pers. 900 pers.

  3. The Environmental Protection System in Denmark 2007 • contact to parliament • statutory orders • circulars MINISTER ENVIRONMENTAL APPEAL BOARD 80 pers. First and final instance of appeal DANISH ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY (DEPA) • advising the Minister • preparation of bills • instructions and guidance • marine environment • chemicals • summary of environmental conditions • investigations • international work 285 pers. 7 STATE INSPECTORATES • 215 environmental complicated • industrial sites - inspection and • approval • municipal plants (wastewater • treatment plants, Incinerators etc.) • mapping groundwater resources • nature conservation (Natura 2000, • Water Frameword Directive etc.) 98 MUNICIPALITIES • most industrial plants (IPPC and other) • & agriculture (IPPC and other) - inspection • and approval • neighbour complaints • waste (collection and depositing) • wastewater treatment • drinking water • local and regional planning • monitoring environment 700 pers. 1.200 pers.

  4. Danish Environmental Protection Act Objectives to: • prevent and abate pollution • make regulation • reduce use and waste of resources • strengthen cleaner technology • strengthen recycling

  5. The environmental solutions have changed • Dilution • Purification • BAT • Sustainability • Higher smokestacks • Reduced concentrations • End of pipe purification • Cleaner technology • Best av. cleaning tech. • Life cycle concept • (Product policy)

  6. The environmental solutions have changed 1973 Dilution 1980 Purification ??? 2001 C.T.(1991) BAT SUSTAINABILITY Life cycle concept Product policy

  7. Role of the env. authority • Approving: permits/licenses • Enforcing: inspection and control • Advisory: voluntary dialogue on • better env.performance, e.g. cleaner • production, env. management • schemes etc.

  8. National minimum frequencies for total inspections • Licensed installations – appr. 7.000 (IPPC or national regulation): 100 % in 3 years • Installations regulated by specific branch orders and installations on a specific inspection list – appr. 15.000: 100 % in 4 years • Animal farms except IPPC – appr. 40.000: 100 % in 6 years

  9. A ”TOTAL INSPECTION” = ”Checking all relevant environmental matters at the installation (industrial plant or animal farm)” • Responsibility of the env. authority that all relevant environmental matters are checked by 1 total inspection • Authority guarantees in reporting to DEPA that the quality of the single inspection is OK • National minimum frequencies for total inspections

  10. Purpose of differentiated inspection:- prioritizing inspection resources depending on company’s environmental performance Level 3 Level 2 Level 1 Company’s environmental effort Authority’s inspection effort Minimum frequency for total inspection

  11. DEPA guideline on differentiated inspection - a resource prioritizing tool Categorizing industry and farms into level 1, 2 or 3 depending on: • System in environmental work • Information to authority • Compliance with environmental regulation

  12. Categorizingcompanies and farms

  13. Including pollution risk etc. in the overall prioritization • Installation’s potential for pollution - including risk in relation to the location • Authority’s environmental control campaigns or tracking down of polluting sources

  14. Example of total prioritisation of inspection resources

  15. Prioritizing: Score 1 if environmental important, otherwise score 0

  16. Report to Danish EPA May 2006

  17. Example on distribution of resources Average distribution of inspection resources per type of installation for 1 total inspection, compared to categorisation

  18. IMPEL Report on Benchmarking of Environmental Inspectorates Why benchmarking? • To promote uniformity in inspection approach • To make inspection procedures more transparent • To make inspectorates’ decisions more uniform • To stimulate efficiency in inspectorates

  19. Ideas of parameters ( input, output or outcome) - suitable for benchmarking • Resources - staffing, equipment, salaries etc. • Average time for licensing/inspection etc. • Education level/variety of education in inspectorate • Proportion of installations for inspection/inspector • Proportion of permits with public participation • Customers’ (companies’) satisfaction • Quality and quantity of public relations (press information, prints, websites etc.) • Auditing of licenses/inspections • Risk classification systems for prioritisation • Positive changes of operators’ behaviour • Better EMS in comparable installations • Etc.

  20. How to connecting goals/targets with parameters/indicators 1. Goals/targets (what to achieve?) 2. Justification (why?) 3. Parameter (what to measure) 4. Indicator (Are we on the right track?) 5. Means of verification (How to measure) 6. Barriers/obstacles?

  21. Existing or planned quality measurement systems in environmetal inspectorates (national and/or regional and/or local authorities) • Benchmarking of inspectorates • Quality system (ISO 9000, EMAS) • Quality ensurance procedures • Training in inspection principles • Inspection and planning procedures/guidelines • Multi-agency enforcement actions • Registration and reporting systems (number, time, • costs etc. per main item)

  22. FIN

More Related