Anp logistics system decision brief coa development 6 october 2011
This presentation is the property of its rightful owner.
Sponsored Links
1 / 56

ANP Logistics System Decision Brief COA Development 6 October 2011 PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 77 Views
  • Uploaded on
  • Presentation posted in: General

ANP Logistics System Decision Brief COA Development 6 October 2011. COA Guidance (New). COA 1 “Centralized” – NLC, 5+1 RLC, 1 PSP, 1+Trans Bde, RLC Trans Coy+

Download Presentation

ANP Logistics System Decision Brief COA Development 6 October 2011

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Presentation Transcript


Anp logistics system decision brief coa development 6 october 2011

ANP Logistics SystemDecision BriefCOA Development 6 October 2011


Coa guidance new

COA Guidance (New)

  • COA 1 “Centralized” – NLC, 5+1 RLC, 1 PSP, 1+Trans Bde, RLC Trans Coy+

    • No new builds, develop distribution systems, “everything at the centre”, timed “pushes”, develop RLC Trans BN to sustain districts, focus on growing organic capability for maintenance, use $ saving for RLC trans BN and civ pay reform

  • COA 2 “No PSPs” - NLC, 8 x RLC, 0 x PSP, 1+ Trans Bdes

    • Build new RLC’s, no PSP’s, focus on improved distribution system, pillar integration, contracted/organic maintenance, $ savings for increase Trans Bdes and civ pay reform

  • COA 3 - “MOI Supply Points” – NLC, 8-12+ MSP’s, Trans Bde

    • Develop NLC, add 4+ RLC’s based on geography/distance, remove a layer within the system (PSP), develop mat transfer point below the region if req’d, enhance trans where needed

  • COA 4 – “Hybrid ANA/ANP” – Leverage ANA/ANP efficiencies to sustain the force

    • Only build new infrastructure if operationally required. May require to increase storage capacity at RLCs/RLSCs. Develop potential future area of cooperation (i.e. Utilize ASC to manage Distribution System from National to Regional level, Warehousing, Inventory management tool, Fuel, Foods, etc).

Last Updated: 29 Sep 11

POC: LCol Erickson, 237-0190


Common to all coa s

Common to all COA’s

  • National Logistics Center – Wardak

  • Existing Regional Logistics Centers

  • National Transport Brigade*

  • Limited organic maintenance capability will be developed by 2014

  • Requirement for contracted support through 2014*

    • Vehicle, Weapons, Comms Maintenance

  • Concept for Critical Class Items

    • Fuel, Uniforms, Food

  • Leverage ANA capacity where possible

    • Long-term objective beyond 2014

* slight variations per COA

Last Updated: 22 Sep 11

POC: LCol Erickson, 237-0190


Anp logistics system decision brief coa development 6 october 2011

COA 1 – “Centralized”

1 National Logistics Center

5 Regional Logistics Centers

2 - Sites to be used as a RLC

Badakhshan

Jowzjan

Balkh

Konduz

  • Concept of Sustainment

  • Provinces sustained by “closest” supply point (defined in policy)

  • 2012 – Build, Field, Improve

    • Force sustained by 5 centers

    • Trans capabilities fielded

    • Organic capacity developed

    • Significant contracted maintenance

    • Limited RLC upgrade

    • Develop Policy, procedures

    • Develop training/trainers

  • 2013 – Grow, Transition

    • NLC, RLC Jalalabad, ILF Kabul

    • Thicken Trans Capability

    • Enhanced PHQ, DHQ capacity

    • Centers at CM2B by end year

    • Contracts transitioned to MOI lead

  • 2014 – Sustain

    • 2 years of “making it work”

    • Afghan led contracts in place

    • ISAF in oversight

Takhar

Samangan

Faryah

Sar-I Pol

Panjshir

Baghlan

Nuristan

Badghis

Kapisa

Parwan

Kunar

Bamyan

Laghman

Wardak

Herat

Kabul

Nangarhar

Logar

Ghor

Day Kundi

Ghazni

Paktya

Khowst

Uruzgan

Farah

Zabul

Paktika

Nimroz

Helmand

Kandahar

2012

2013

2014


Coa 1 proposed org chart

COA 1 – Proposed Org Chart

2012

NLC

Wardak

279/630/272/470

(1651)

2012

MSC

Wardak

107/107/53/413

(680)

2013

Ammunition

5/14/51/6

(76)

2013

Trans Brigade HQ

32/51/40/14

(137)

2011

MoI Hq

Kabul

82/27/0/47

(156)

+304

2012

MMC

Wardak

79/18/0/25

(122)

2012

Trans Kandaks

Wardak

56/440/128/12

(636)

+159

2013

RLC

Kabul

19/26/19/85

(149)

2013

RLC

Nangarhar

19/26/19/90

(154)

2011

RLC

MeS

27/36/31/90

(184)

2011

RLC

Kandahar

32/39/38/90

(199)

2011

RLC

Gardez

23/44/38/90

(195)

2011

RLC

Herat

22/45/38/90

(195)

2011

PSP

LKG

29/41/36/90

(196)

+145

+145

+145

+145

+145

+145

+145

Kabul

294

Nangahar

299

MeS

329

Kandahar

344

Gardez

340

Herat

340

LKG

341

  • Redistribution: 1871 positions (offset) – 51% Civ

  • Uplift of mechanics (~100 per RLC, 2-6 per PHQ)

  • RLC training teams (~10-12)

  • Increase of drivers at PHQ/DHQ (~125 total)

  • 1645 Positions (843 Civilian)

PHQ’s/DHQ’s

+ 6-10

Last Updated: 30 Sep 11

POC: Lt Col Moton, CJ1


Anp logistics system decision brief coa development 6 october 2011

COA 2 – “No PSPs”

1 National Logistics Center

8 Regional Logistics Centers

Future sites

Badakhshan

  • Concept of Sustainment

  • Provinces sustained by regional supply points (defined in policy)

  • 2012 – Build, Field, Improve

    • Force sustained by 5 centers

    • Build 4 new RLC’s

    • Trans capabilities fielded

    • Organic capacity developed

    • Contracted maintenance

    • Develop Policy, procedures

    • Develop training/trainers

  • 2013 – Grow, Transition

    • NLC, RLC Jalalabad, ILF Kabul

    • Thicken Trans Capability

    • Centers at CM2B by end year

    • Contracts transitioned to MOI lead

    • New RLC’s online end-year

  • 2014 – Sustain

    • Afghan led contracts in place

    • Afghan training teams in place

    • ISAF in oversight

Jowzjan

Balkh

Konduz

Takhar

Samangan

Faryah

Sar-I Pol

Panjshir

Baghlan

Nuristan

Badghis

Kapisa

Parwan

Kunar

Bamyan

Laghman

Wardak

Herat

Kabul

Nangarhar

Logar

Ghor

Day Kundi

Ghazni

Paktya

Khowst

Uruzgan

Farah

Zabul

Paktika

Nimroz

Helmand

Kandahar

2012

2013

2014

Last Updated: 20 Sep 11

POC: LCol Erickson, 237-0190

UNCLASSIFIED//REL TO NATO/ISAF


Coa 2 proposed org chart

COA 2 – Proposed Org Chart

2012

MSC

Wardak

107/107/53/413

(680)

2013

Ammunition

5/14/51/6

(76)

2013

Trans Brigade HQ

32/51/40/14

(137)

2012

NLC

Wardak

279/630/272/470

(1651)

2011

MoI Hq

Kabul

82/27/0/47

(156)

+304

2012

MMC

Wardak

79/18/0/25

(122)

2012

Trans Kandaks

Wardak

56/440/128/12

(636)

+159

2013

RLC

Kabul

19/26/19/85

(149)

2013

RLC

Nangarhar

19/26/19/90

(154)

2011

RLC

MeS

27/36/31/90

(184)

2011

RLC

Kandahar

32/39/38/90

(199)

2011

RLC

Gardez

23/44/38/90

(195)

2011

RLC

Herat

22/45/38/90

(195)

2014

RLC

LKG

29/41/36/90

(196)

2014

RLC

Konduz

18/26/19/83

(146)

+135

+135

+135

+135

+135

+135

+135

+135

Kabul

284

Nangarhar

289

MeS

319

Kandahar

334

Gardez

330

Herat

330

LKG

331

Konduz

281

  • Redistribution: 1725 positions (offset) – 50% Civ

  • Uplift of mechanics (~100 per RLC, 2-6 per PHQ)

  • RLC training teams (~10-12)

  • Increase of drivers/staff at PHQ/DHQ (153 total)

  • 1696 positions required ( 859 Civilian)

PHQ’s/DHQ’s

+ 6-10

Last Updated: 30 Sep 11

POC: LTC Moton, CJ1


Anp logistics system decision brief coa development 6 october 2011

COA 3 – “MOI Supply Points”

1 National Logistics Center

7 Regional Logistics Centers

7 New Sites for MSP+

Future sites outlined in yellow

Badakhshan

Jowzjan

Balkh

Konduz

Takhar

  • Concept of Sustainment

  • Provinces sustained by regional logistics centers

  • 2012 – Build, Field, Improve

    • Partner 5 sites

    • Build MOI Supply point

    • Contracted maintenance

    • Develop Policy, procedures

    • Develop training/trainers

  • 2013 – Grow, Transition

    • NLC, RLC Jalalabad, ILF Kabul

    • Thicken Trans Capability

    • Centers at CM2B by end year

    • Contracts transitioned to MOI lead

    • New RLC’s online end-year

  • 2014 – Sustain

    • Afghan led contracts in place

    • Leverage Lateral support

    • ISAF in oversight

Samangan

Faryah

Sar-I Pol

Panjshir

Baghlan

Nuristan

Badghis

Kapisa

Parwan

Kunar

Bamyan

Laghman

Wardak

Herat

Kabul

Nangarhar

Logar

Day Kundi

Ghor

Ghazni

Paktya

Khowst

Uruzgan

Farah

Zabul

Paktika

Nimroz

Helmand

Kandahar

Last Updated: 20 Sep 11

POC: LTC Moton, CJ1

UNCLASSIFIED//REL TO NATO/ISAF


Coa 3 proposed org

COA 3 – Proposed Org

2012

MSC

Wardak

107/107/53/413

(680)

2013

Ammunition

5/14/51/6

(76)

2013

Trans Brigade HQ

32/51/40/14

(137)

2012

NLC

Wardak

279/630/272/470

(1651)

2011

MoI Hq

Kabul

82/27/0/47

(156)

+304

2012

MMC

Wardak

79/18/0/25

(122)

2012

Trans Kandaks

Wardak

56/440/128/12

(636)

+159

2013

RLC

Kabul

19/26/19/85

(149)

2013

RLC

Nangarhar

19/26/19/90

(154)

2011

RLC

MeS

27/36/31/90

(184)

2011

RLC

Kandahar

32/39/38/90

(199)

2011

RLC

Gardez

23/44/38/90

(195)

2011

RLC

Herat

22/45/38/90

(195)

2011

RLC

LKG

29/41/36/90

(196)

2014MSP

JOWZJAN

18/26/19/83

(146)

2014

MSP

TAKHAR

18/26/19/83

(146)

2014

MSP

BAGHLAN

18/26/19/83

(146)

2013

MSP

GHAZNI

18/26/19/83

(146)

2013

MSP

FARAH

18/26/19/83

(146)

2013

MSP

ZABOL

18/26/19/83

(146)

2013

MSP

DAY KUNDI

18/26/19/83

(146)

+146

+17

+154

+17

+17

+17

+17

+17

+146

+146

+146

+146

+146

+146

+10 Training Team per RLC/MSP (140)

+ 104 mechanics across country

  • Redistribution: 703 positions (offset) – 50% Civ

  • Uplift of mechanics (~104 total)

  • RLC training teams (~10-12)

  • 703 Positions redistributed.

Last Updated: 30 Sep 11

POC: LTC Moton, CJ1


Coa 4 hybrid ana anp

COA 4 – “Hybrid ANA/ANP”

What we know

  • ANA does not have existing extra capacity:

    • ANA does not have extra distribution capacity

  • Cooperation between MoI and MoD is almost non-existent

  • The inter-ministerial MoU between MoI and MoD is not applied

    What we think

  • Opportunities exist to build area of cooperation in the future, but will require engagement at the ministerial level (10 year objective)

    • Focus on cooperation at the National and regional level

      What we need

  • What can be co-located, cooperated, integrated?

  • Fuel, Ammo, Food, Vehicle Spares/Maint, Weapons Maint


Anp logistics system decision brief coa development 6 october 2011

COA 4 – “Hybrid”

1 National Logistics Center

5 Regional Logistics Centers

2 - Sites to be used as a RLC

6 x RLSC (ANA)

Badakhshan

Jowzjan

Balkh

Konduz

Takhar

Samangan

Faryah

  • Concept of Hybrid Logistics

  • Determine levels of cooperation, coordination, integration

  • National (Ministerial), Operational (Regional), Tactical (Provincial)

  • 5/6 - RLC/RLSC in similar locations (already built)

  • Commonality: Medical, Fuel, Food, Water, Parts (LTV)

  • National – Log Coord Agreement, cooperate Training, civil service, personality dependant

  • Regional – RLC – RLSC cooperation possibility, coordination

  • Provincial – coordination/ cooperation unlikely

  • Sar-I Pol

    Panjshir

    Baghlan

    Nuristan

    Badghis

    Kapisa

    Parwan

    Kunar

    Bamyan

    Laghman

    Wardak

    Herat

    Kabul

    Nangarhar

    Logar

    Ghor

    Day Kundi

    Ghazni

    Paktya

    Khowst

    Farah

    Uruzgan

    Zabul

    Paktika

    Nimroz

    Helmand

    Kandahar

    Last Updated: 20 Sep 11

    POC: LCol Erickson, 237-0190


    Coa 4 hybrid

    COA 4 – “Hybrid”

    • Full integration is not possible in the next 2 years

    • 3 level of potential cooperation

      • Strategic

      • Operational

      • Tactical

    • Integration is not a singular COA, but rather must be considered for all COA (identified as common COA dev factor)

    • More work required to develop areas of possible cooperation

    Last Updated: 29 Sep 11

    POC: Col Nultsch, CJ4


    Coa summary

    COA Summary

    COA 1 - Centralized

    COA 2 – No PSP’s

    COA 3 – MSP

    COA 4 – Hybrid

    Infrastructure

    No new builds

    Regionally Focused

    NLC

    5-6 RLC’s, 1 PSP

    PHQ, DHQ

    Regionally Focused

    NLC

    8 x RLC (new builds)

    PHQ, DHQ

    Area support

    NLC

    7 x RLC, ~7 MOI Supply Points

    PHQ, DHQ

    4/6 RLC/RLSC proximate

    RC-East

    Training

    Leverage ANA CSS School

    Logistics Train the Trainer

    CF mobile training teams

    Focus on RLC as training center and OJT

    Leverage ANA CSS School

    Logistics Train the Trainer (Afghan)

    CF mobile training teams

    Focus on RLC as training center, OJT

    Leverage ANA CSS School

    Logistics Train the Trainer

    CF mobile training teams

    Off-site training for new builds

    Afghan TTT in the lead 2013

    Leverage ANA CSS School

    Afghan TTT in the lead 2013

    Distribution

    NLC – Trans Brigade (4 + 2)

    RLC trans coy uplift

    PHQ, DHQ trans uplift (distant sites)

    Contracted Jingle Trucks

    “come and get it”

    NLC – Trans Brigade (4)

    RLC trans coy uplift

    PHQ, DHQ trans uplift (distant sites)

    Contracted Jingle Trucks

    NLC – Trans Brigade (4)

    RLC, MOI SP get Trans uplift

    PHQ, DHQ

    Contracted Jingle Trucks until capacity fielded

    Possibility to coordinate convoys

    Equipment

    Transfer of procurement responsibility over time (sequenced)

    MOI Contracting capability

    Local procurement of non-ASL items

    No change

    No change

    National Efficiencies possible

    Maintenance

    Develop organic capability within ANP (1st line), MMT

    Contracted maintenance 2nd, 3rd line

    DP- Civilian pay parity, ability to afford the contracts

    No change

    No Change (more sites to develop in 2013)

    Combined national contracts possible

    Personnel

    1,871 personnel to re-distribute

    Add to RLC, PHQ, DHQ

    Develop MTT

    Increase pillar log capacity

    1,725 personnel to re-distribute

    Add to RLC, PHQ, DHQ

    Develop MTT

    Increase pillar log capacity

    703 personnel to re-distribute

    Fill MOI SP positions

    Develop MTT

    Combined training possible

    Last Updated: 23 Sep 11

    POC: LCol Erickson, 237-0190


    Wargaming walkthrough rules

    Wargaming/Walkthrough Rules

    • Remain patient

    • Remain unbiased

    • Remain positive

    • List advantages and disadvantages (as found)

    • Continually assess COA feasibility, acceptability, and suitability

    • Avoid drawing premature conclusions and gathering facts to support such conclusions

    • Compare COAs during comparison process: Not during war game

    • Looking to refine the current COA’s


    Coa walkthrough

    COA Walkthrough

    • End-to-End system check – “how do xxx sustain themselves within the COA, is the CONOPS valid”

    • AUP – RC-W, RC-N

    • ABP – Green Border, Blue Border sites in RC-S, RC-E

    • ANCOP – Deployed to RC-S, RC-E

    • ALP – RC-S, RC-E

    • GDPSU - RC Capital, RC-SW

    • Discussion and refinement is essential


    Aup west 1 apr 14

    AUP WEST - 1 Apr 14

    2/3 ANCOP

    PHQ Herat

    PSP Badghis

    PSP Ghor

    PHQ Badghis

    RCP

    PHQ Ghor

    RHQ 606 Zone

    RLC West

    RTC Herat

    MOI Reg HQ

    ABP Zone 4 HQ

    3rd Bde ANCOP

    SSB

    1/3 ANCOP

    3/3 ANCOP

    RTC Adraskan

    Complete

    1 Jul 11

    1 Apr 12

    1 Apr 13

    RPTC Shindand

    1 Apr 14

    PSP Farah

    PHQ Farah

    4/3 ANCOP


    Aup north west 1 apr 14

    AUP NORTH (West) – 1 Apr 14

    RTC MeS

    GPTC MeS

    PHQ Jawzjan

    RCP MeS

    PSP Jawzjan

    2/6 ANCOP

    RTC Kunduz

    GPTC Kunduz

    PHQ Kunduz

    PSP Kunduz

    3/ 6 ANCOP

    PHQ Baghlan

    RHQ Zn 303

    PSP Baghlan

    PHQ Samangan

    Complete

    RLC MeS

    4/ 6 ANCOP

    RCP Baghlan

    PSP Samangan

    1 Jul 11

    MoI Reg HQ

    PHQ Sari Pul

    1 Apr 12

    PHQ Faryab

    PSP Sari Pul

    BP Zone 5 HQ

    1 Apr 13

    PSP Faryab

    6th Bde HQ/SSB

    1 Apr 14

    1/ 6 ANCOP


    Aup north east 1 apr 14

    AUP NORTH (East) – 1 Apr 14

    PHQ Badakhshan

    PSP Badakhshan

    Complete

    1 Jul 11

    1 Apr 12

    1 Apr 13

    1 Apr 14

    PHQ Takhar

    PSP Takhar


    Coa walk through

    COA - Walk-Through


    Coa walk through1

    COA - Walk-Through


    Abp south 1 apr 14

    ABP SOUTH – 1 Apr 14

    PHQ Day Kundi

    BP Zone 3 HQ

    PSP Day Kundi

    MoI Reg HQ

    RHQ Zn 404

    PHQ Kandahar

    RLC

    Daykundi

    3/2 ANCOP

    PHQ TarinKot

    1/2 ANCOP

    PSP TarinKot

    PSP Qalat

    Uruzgan

    4/2 ANCOP

    PHQ Qalat

    Zabul

    Complete

    1 Jul 11

    2/2 ANCOP

    1 Apr 12

    2nd Bde HQ/SSB

    1 Apr 13

    1 Apr 14

    Kandahar

    RPTC Kandahar

    RTC Kandahar

    RCP Kandahar


    Ancop abp east south 1 apr 14

    ANCOP/ABP EAST (South) – 1 Apr 14

    PSP Bamayan

    Trans Brigade Wardak

    PHQ Bamayan

    ANP Ammo Bunkers

    RTC Bamyan

    NLC Wardak

    PHQ Wardak

    Complete

    3/1 ANCOP

    1 Jul 11

    1 Apr 12

    1 Apr 13

    NPTC Wardak

    1 Apr 14

    PHQ Logar

    PSP Logar

    PSP Khost

    PHQ Khost

    PSP Ghazni

    PHQ Ghazni

    2/4 ANCOP

    RHQ Zn 505

    PHQ Paktya

    4/4 ANCOP

    1/4 ANCOP

    RLC Gardez

    RTC Gardez

    PHQ Paktika

    BP Zone 2 HQ

    3/4 ANCOP

    4th Bde ANCOP

    PSP Paktika

    4th Bde SSB

    RCP Gardez

    MoI Reg HQ


    Ancop abp east north 1 apr 14

    ANCOP/ABP EAST (North) – 1 Apr 14

    RHQ Zn 202 (in Kabul)

    PSP Mehtar Lem

    PSP Kapisa

    PSP Panjsher

    PHQ Nuristan

    CHC+ Mehtar Lem

    PHQ Kapisa

    PHQ Parwan

    PHQ Panjsher

    PSP Nuristan

    PHQ Mehter Lem

    PSP Parwan

    PHQ Kunar

    PSP Kunar

    2/1 ANCOP

    RPTC Parwan

    Complete

    1 Jul 11

    1 Apr 12

    1 Apr 13

    4/1 ANCOP

    1 Apr 14

    PHQ Nangahar

    RTC Jalalabad

    ABP Zone 1 HQ

    5/1 ANCOP

    CHC+ Jalalabad

    RLC Jalalabad

    RCP Jalalabad

    MoI Reg HQ


    Coa walk through2

    COA - Walk-Through


    Coa walk through3

    COA - Walk-Through


    Coa walk through4

    COA - Walk-Through


    Coa walk through5

    COA - Walk-Through


    Aup west 1 apr 141

    AUP WEST - 1 Apr 14

    2/3 ANCOP

    PHQ Herat

    PSP Badghis

    PSP Ghor

    PHQ Badghis

    RCP

    PHQ Ghor

    RHQ 606 Zone

    RLC West

    RTC Herat

    MOI Reg HQ

    ABP Zone 4 HQ

    3rd Bde ANCOP

    SSB

    1/3 ANCOP

    3/3 ANCOP

    RTC Adraskan

    Complete

    1 Jul 11

    1 Apr 12

    1 Apr 13

    RPTC Shindand

    1 Apr 14

    PSP Farah

    PHQ Farah

    4/3 ANCOP


    Aup north west 1 apr 141

    AUP NORTH (West) – 1 Apr 14

    RTC MeS

    GPTC MeS

    PHQ Jawzjan

    RCP MeS

    PSP Jawzjan

    2/6 ANCOP

    RTC Kunduz

    GPTC Kunduz

    PHQ Kunduz

    PSP Kunduz

    3/ 6 ANCOP

    PHQ Baghlan

    RHQ Zn 303

    PSP Baghlan

    PHQ Samangan

    Complete

    RLC MeS

    4/ 6 ANCOP

    RCP Baghlan

    PSP Samangan

    1 Jul 11

    MoI Reg HQ

    PHQ Sari Pul

    1 Apr 12

    PHQ Faryab

    PSP Sari Pul

    BP Zone 5 HQ

    1 Apr 13

    PSP Faryab

    6th Bde HQ/SSB

    1 Apr 14

    1/ 6 ANCOP


    Aup north east 1 apr 141

    AUP NORTH (East) – 1 Apr 14

    PHQ Badakhshan

    PSP Badakhshan

    Complete

    1 Jul 11

    1 Apr 12

    1 Apr 13

    1 Apr 14

    PHQ Takhar

    PSP Takhar


    Anp logistics system decision brief coa development 6 october 2011

    77 Approved ALP Districts (22,848 spaces)

    46 Validated sites (14,198 spaces)

    Plus 231 AUP spaces (3 per AUP District with ALP)

    Received report that 30K is expected in the FY-12 budget.

    Afghan Local Police Sites Status

    Tashkils Approval

    Site Validation Pending

    Sites Validated

    MoI In-Processed

    77

    31

    46

    33

    21

    24

    23

    25

    22

    11

    49

    50

    64

    48

    12

    46

    62

    13

    39

    73

    76

    63

    51

    70

    72

    71

    43

    10

    77

    29 35

    75

    38

    36

    34

    69

    37

    7

    30

    56

    33

    31

    9

    8

    47

    32

    3

    26

    1

    14

    2

    16

    66

    27

    53

    20

    45

    18

    54

    5

    44

    60

    17

    59

    6

    41

    65

    In-Processed Sites

    Sites Validated

    Pending Validation

    Pending Tashkils

    ALP HQ

    68

    67

    61

    28

    19

    55

    42

    57

    74

    4

    15

    52

    40

    58

    7,610 Members/77 MoI Approved Sites Identified by IJC/CFSOCC-A

    UNCLASSIFIED


    Gdpsu capital

    GDPSU CAPITAL

    National Fire Trng Academy

    GPDSU CRU

    RLC Kabul

    ANP National HQ

    1st Bde ANCOP SSB

    RCP Kabul

    Complete

    1 Jul 11

    MOI HQ & NPCC

    1 Apr 12

    AACP Kabul Compound

    1 Apr 13

    ANCOP HQ

    1 Apr 14

    ANCOP 1/1

    MoI Trans. Brigade

    1st BDE HQ

    ABP National HQ

    RHQ Zn 202


    Coa comparison

    COA Comparison

    • Amount of Transportation required, less is better

    • Number of ANP personnel (police/civ) required to run system, less is better

    • Operational readiness delivered, more is better with 85% as minimum

    • Overall cost, less is better

    • Increases local economic utilization, more is better

    • Time required to implement, less is better

    • Requirement for Coalition Forces personnel support, less is better

    • Share ANA capacity, more is better


    Decision support matrix

    Decision Support Matrix

    2012

    2013

    2014

    Oct

    Jan

    Nov

    Dec

    Feb

    Mar

    Apr

    Jul

    Jan

    Jan

    May

    Jun

    Aug

    Sep

    Oct

    Feb

    Mar

    Apr

    Jul

    Feb

    Mar

    Nov

    Dec

    May

    Jun

    Aug

    Sep

    Oct

    Nov

    Dec


    Decision support matrix1

    Decision Support Matrix

    2012

    2013

    2014

    Oct

    Jan

    Nov

    Dec

    Feb

    Mar

    Apr

    Jul

    Jan

    Jan

    May

    Jun

    Aug

    Sep

    Oct

    Feb

    Mar

    Apr

    Jul

    Feb

    Mar

    Nov

    Dec

    May

    Jun

    Aug

    Sep

    Oct

    Nov

    Dec


    Sustainment estimates

    Sustainment Estimates

    Ammunition*:

    • 9mm Cartridge-5.4 years

    • 7.62 x 39mm (Ball)-4.1 years

    • 7.62 x 39mm (Tracer)-4.0 years

    • 7.62 x 54mm (Ball & match ball) -2.3 & 1.9 years respectively

    • 7.62 x 54mm (Tracer)-3.9 years

    • 12 Gauge Buckshot-10.9 years

    • 12 Gauge Slug-44.9 years

    • Grenade, Smoke (Yellow & Red) - 22.4 & 35.1 years respectively

    • Signal, Illumination, Ground (White & Green Star) -133.9, 10.6 years

    • Mortar 82mm (HE/HE Frag, Smoke & Illumination)- 119.2, 234.1 & 260 years

      *Ammunition – years supply based on 3 year average usage, includes stock on hand and on order


    Sustainment estimates1

    Sustainment Estimates

    • Fuel*:

    • ANP Monthly avg Vehicle Fuel demand -3,560,284 litres

    • Cost for above-$6,107,668

    • ANP Monthly avg Generator Fuel demand-1,288,061 litres

    • Cost for above-$2,209,668

    • Total fuel cost per month-$8,317,336

      * Fuel – Average based on 18 month usage data, cost based on 6 month average cost of $1.7155 a litre

    • Fleet of ~22,000 vehicles


    Recommended staff actions

    Recommended Staff Actions

    • Investigate supplemental funding options for civilian employees (offset from infra savings?) – DCOM - Prog

    • Develop logistic training policy framework – CJ4/CTAG

    • Adjust vehicle fielding – CJ/P7/SAO

      • ID essential requirements per pillar

      • Decrease total number of vehicles to improve sustainability

      • Adjust fielding plan for current regions

    • Cease ammunition procurement – SAO/P7

      • reassess requirements 2013

    • Re-assess NTM-A, ANA/ANP partnering plan for 2012 – CJ4/ACG-PD

    • Unify Medical, Comms, vehicles, equipment, OCIE fielding within NTM-A – CJ6, CJ4, MTAG

    • Transition Uniforms, Food, Water responsibilities to MOI as soon as practical – SAO/CJ4


    Ntm a c2 summary

    NTM-A C2 Summary

    Supported

    Supporting

    Infrastructure

    Training

    Distribution

    CJ4

    Equipment

    Maintenance

    Personnel

    Last Updated: 23 Sep 11

    POC: LCol Erickson, 237-0190


    Coa analysis

    COA Analysis

    • Areas for further development

      • Plan to develop/improve Policy Process Procedures

      • Regional Requirements/Capacity

      • Provincial Requirements/Capability

      • Pillar Police Requirements

      • Training Plan by Zone, Region, Pillar

    • Ultimately…recommendations for the system

      • Assessment of Feasibility

      • Long-term sustainability

    Last Updated: 25 Sep 11

    POC: LCol Erickson, 237-0190


    Factors for coa comparison

    Factors for COA Comparison

    • Simplicity

    • Long Term Sustainability

    • Flexibility

    • Adaptability

    • Ease of Implementation

    • Timeline (Transition)

    • Training Requirements

    • Cost

    • Enemy

    • Local Engagement/Economic Development

    • Pillar police requirements

    Weighting factors under development

    Last Updated: 23 Sep 11

    POC: LCol Erickson, 237-0190


    Anp logistics system

    ANP Logistics System

    Operational Capability

    Procurement

    Priorities

    End Users

    People

    Transport

    National Level Logistics

    Accountability

    Storage (?)


    Coa capacity anp personnel

    COA Capacity – ANP Personnel

    Last Updated: 20 Sep 11

    POC: LCol Erickson, 237-0190


    Coa capacity sites

    COA Capacity – Sites

    788 Sites

    Last Updated: 20 Sep 11

    POC: LCol Erickson, 237-0190


    Coa capacity vehicles

    COA Capacity – Vehicles

    Last Updated: 20 Sep 11

    POC: LCol Erickson, 237-0190


    Coa capacity weapons

    COA Capacity - Weapons

    Last Updated: 20 Sep 11

    POC: LCol Erickson, 237-0190


    Coa capacity comms equipment

    COA Capacity – Comms Equipment

    Last Updated: 20 Sep 11

    POC: LCol Erickson, 237-0190


    Coa capacity eod equipment

    COA Capacity – EOD Equipment

    Last Updated: 20 Sep 11

    POC: LCol Erickson, 237-0190


    Coa capacity special tools

    COA Capacity – Special Tools

    Last Updated: 20 Sep 11

    POC: LCol Erickson, 237-0190


    Coa capacity fuel

    COA Capacity – Fuel

    Last Updated: 20 Sep 11

    POC: LCol Erickson, 237-0190


    Anp logistics system decision brief coa development 6 october 2011

    AFGHAN NATIONAL POLICE

    Guidance and Discussion

    UNCLASSIFIED


    Coa 1 medical

    COA 1 – Medical

    • Key Activities

    • Positive Control on CL VIII by medical logisticians organic to national distribution system.

    • Move to Wardak.

    • Tashkil adjustment.

    • Concept of Medical

    • Zone Surgeon/Rep is responsible to collect requests from respective regional medical clinics.

    • Zone Rep moves MoI 14* through chain; routed through OTSG.

    • Zone rep travel to Wardak NLC CL VIII whse and deliver original MoI 14.

    • Wardak fills order, issues MoI 9.

    • Zone rep transport small order or coordinate NLC convoy transportation with Trans Bde for large shipment to RLC.

    • Zone Surgeon will oversee regional distribution.

    • *Exploring feasibility of electronic MoI 14 process

    • Risk

    • Availability of funding, supplies, and trained personnel.

    • Afghan Medical Leadership may not buy-in fearing loss of control over medical assets.

    • Request

    • Facilities fill MoI 14 and send to Zone.

    • Rep, who forwards through chain.

    • Zone Rep travel to Wardak and presents MoI 14 to NLC Medical whse.

    • Order filled based on available CL VIII.

    • Receive

    • MoI 9 signed by Zone rep.

    • Zone rep issue to Clinic rep from RLC.

    • Clinic rep signs MoI 9.

    • Reconcile

    • Wardak CL VIII whse to track usage from Zone rep.

    • Zone rep reconcile issue with reach clinic request.

    • Distribute

    • Zone rep transport small orders.

    • Zone rep coord convoys with NLC for large shipment.

    • Clinics recv supplies at RLC.

    • Contract Transition Plan

    • Transfer procurement of medical material to Afghans.

    • Obtain medical equipment that is sustainable* with supporting maintenance contracts if BMET not available.

    • * From SWA, India, Pakistan, FSRs, not U.S. or Europe

    Decision Points

    15

    9

    3

    Some Procured through CSTC-A (SAO)

    Medical - Procurement

    MoI Procured

    Dependent on strong mentor oversight

    Medical – Support operations

    MoI Oversight Provided

    Dependent on strong mentor oversight

    Medical – Equipment Maintenance Operations

    Procured through CSTC-A (SAO)

    MoI Procured

    2012

    2013

    2014

    Oct

    Jan

    Nov

    Dec

    Feb

    Mar

    Apr

    Jul

    Jan

    Jan

    May

    Jun

    Aug

    Sep

    Oct

    Feb

    Mar

    Apr

    Jul

    Feb

    Mar

    Apr

    Nov

    Dec

    May

    Jun

    Aug

    Sep

    Oct

    Nov

    Dec

    Last Updated: 22 Sep 11

    POC: Maj Glynn, 237-3107


    Coa 1

    COA 1

    COA 1 “Centralized” – NLC, 5+1 RLC, 1 PSP, 1+Trans Bde, RLC Trans Coy+

    • No new builds, develop distribution systems, “everything at the centre”, timed “pushes”, develop RLC Trans BN to sustain districts, focus on growing organic capability for maintenance, use $ saving for RLC trans BN and civilian pay reform

    • Key Takeaways:

      • Allows more flexibility to support maintenance operations (recovery or transfer from provinces)

      • Allows more transportation flexibility to support / push to RC South & West provinces

      • Streamlines / expedites the flow of equipment / supplies to and from Kabul to RC South & West

      • Supports / streamlines potential retrograde operations

      • Shortens drive time for convoys headed to RC West if used at drop / transfer point

      • Doesn’t centralize all transportation assets in one location

      • Reduces maintenance costs on Trans BDE (Kabul) by reducing miles on their assets

    Last Updated: 30 Sep 11

    POC: MAJ Gonzales, 237-0338


    Coa 11

    COA 1

    Last Updated: 30 Sep 11

    POC: MAJ Gonzales, 237-0338


    Coa 2

    COA 2

    COA 2 “No PSPs” - NLC, 8 x RLC, 0 x PSP, 1+ Trans Bdes

    • Build new RLC’s, no PSP’s, focus on improved distribution system, pillar integration, contracted/organic maintenance, $ savings for increase Trans Bdes and civilian pay reform

    • Key Takeaways:

      • Allows for more equipment being pushed to provinces instead of RLC’s

      • Only 7 types of equipment distributed in this COA vs. 20 types in COA 1

      • Smaller number of vehicle pool due to building of more RLC’s

      • No significant impact / benefit to RC South & West

      • Limits all Trans BDE assets to one location

      • Delivery times to RC West & South negatively impacted

    Last Updated: 30 Sep 11

    POC: MAJ Gonzales, 237-0338


    Coa 3

    COA 3

    COA 3 - “Geographic Ink-Spot” – NLC, 8-12+ RLC, Temp Supply Points, Trans Bde

    • Develop NLC, add 4+ RLC’s based on geography/distance, remove a layer within the system (PSP), develop material transfer point below the region if required, enhance trans where needed

    • Key Takeaways:

      • Increased logistical support for RC South & West & East

      • More $ spent to build RLC’s / Temp Supply Points

      • Smallest pool of equipment left to distribute throughout Afghanistan AO

    Last Updated: 30 Sep 11

    POC: MAJ Gonzales, 237-0338


  • Login