1 / 31

Transfer Line -2 Optics Design For CTF3

Transfer Line -2 Optics Design For CTF3. Amalendu Sharma, Abdurrahim, A.D.Ghodke, Gurnam Singh and V.C. Sahni. Raja Ramanna Centre for Advanced Technology Indore – 452 013 India. CTF3 Collaboration meeting, January 2008, CERN. Indian Contribution. TL-2 @ CTF3. Optics of TL-2.

allayna
Download Presentation

Transfer Line -2 Optics Design For CTF3

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Transfer Line -2 Optics Design For CTF3 Amalendu Sharma, Abdurrahim, A.D.Ghodke, Gurnam Singh and V.C. Sahni Raja Ramanna Centre for Advanced Technology Indore – 452 013 India CTF3 Collaboration meeting, January 2008, CERN

  2. Indian Contribution TL-2 @ CTF3 Optics of TL-2 CTF3 Collaboration meeting, January 2008, CERN

  3. Status of Optics Design • Optics design for required tuning range of R56 completed and delivered to CERN in October 2007. • T566 suppression in entire range with low emittance dilution • Studies do not include wake field/ CSR effects Optics of TL-2 CTF3 Collaboration meeting, January 2008, CERN

  4. Parameters required • R56 -0.30m to +0.30m • T566 0 in entire range •  blow up  <10% Optics of TL-2 CTF3 Collaboration meeting, January 2008, CERN

  5. Magnets Optics of TL-2 CTF3 Collaboration meeting, January 2008, CERN

  6. Design of line: Modules Module-1 Extraction of Combiner Ring to first bending magnet Horizontal Achromat with 2 phase advance Module-2 Module-1 to Module-3 Consist of a clear space for Tail Clipper Clear element free space for Emergency Exit Vertical Achromat Matching triplet for module-3 Optics of TL-2 CTF3 Collaboration meeting, January 2008, CERN

  7. Module-3 Module-2 to CLEX entrance Tunable R56 arc with T566 suppression provision Final matching doublet Optics of TL-2 CTF3 Collaboration meeting, January 2008, CERN

  8. Combiner Ring Septum-1 Septum-2 QF-1-slim QD-slim Previous version QF-2-TSL ~1200mm ~500mm Present version Module-1 Not to scale Optics of TL-2 CTF3 Collaboration meeting, January 2008, CERN

  9. ~1.3m TSL type TSL type Standard type Standard type Qd Qf Qd Qf Qd Qf Qd Qf Vertical Dogleg Place for Tail Clipper ~4m Front of emergency exit ~1.6m Module-2 Qd Qf Qd Not to scale Optics of TL-2 CTF3 Collaboration meeting, January 2008, CERN

  10. ~289mm -30.75 Minor geometrical error in previous version -17.25 Geometrical changes from previous version CLEX Wall 17.25 30.75 Module-3 Not to scale Optics of TL-2 CTF3 Collaboration meeting, January 2008, CERN

  11. Module-3 Continued…. • Mainly constrained by the building geometry • Tunable R56 arc has a symmetry • Two types of dipoles are used • Four sextupoles (driven by two supplies) for T566 suppression • Sufficient space for placing the correctors, BPMs, bellows and vacuum pumps Optics of TL-2 CTF3 Collaboration meeting, January 2008, CERN

  12. Layout of line Optics of TL-2 CTF3 Collaboration meeting, January 2008, CERN

  13. Beta function and dispersion R56 = -0.30m Sign convention of MAD-8 Optics of TL-2 CTF3 Collaboration meeting, January 2008, CERN

  14. Beta function and dispersion Continued… R56 = 0.00m Optics of TL-2 CTF3 Collaboration meeting, January 2008, CERN

  15. Beta function and dispersion Continued… R56 = +0.30m Optics of TL-2 CTF3 Collaboration meeting, January 2008, CERN

  16. Beam size and chamber aperture *  x, y < 40m and Dx < 2.5m, Thus beam size (3, 1% p/p) < 25mm R56 = -0.30m R56 = 0.00m R56 = +0.30m Optics of TL-2 CTF3 Collaboration meeting, January 2008, CERN

  17. T566 correction • Objective: • T566 zero in entire range of R56 tuning • Dispersion is kept higher @ sextupoles to remain within specified strengths • Phase space distortion not too high • Problem: • -I transformer not possible in whole range of tuning • Adjusting quadrupole strengths in module-3 for lowering aberration; a very hard task -> changes dispersion and thus R56 Optics of TL-2 CTF3 Collaboration meeting, January 2008, CERN

  18. T566 correction Continued… • Solution: • Sextupole strength decided by mainly dispersion • Aberration depends on beta function and phases @ sextupoles • Try to obtain the initial conditions @ Module-3 so that the sum of kicks due to sextupoles become minimum Less phase space distortion without disturbing dispersion wave Optics of TL-2 CTF3 Collaboration meeting, January 2008, CERN

  19. Phase space distortion On momentum particles (2) R56 = +0.30m R56 = 0.00m R56 = -0.30m X-Plane Y-Plane Optics of TL-2 CTF3 Collaboration meeting, January 2008, CERN

  20. Phase space distortion On momentum particles (2) R56=-0.15 R56=-0.10 R56=-0.05 R56=-0.25 R56=-0.20 X-Plane Y-Plane Optics of TL-2 CTF3 Collaboration meeting, January 2008, CERN

  21. Phase space distortion On momentum particles (2) R56=0.15 R56=0.10 R56=0.05 R56=0.25 R56=0.20 X-Plane Y-Plane Optics of TL-2 CTF3 Collaboration meeting, January 2008, CERN

  22. Phase space distortion Continued… Off momentum particles (X-Plane) R56 = +0.30m R56 = 0.00m R56 = -0.30m 1% dp/p -1% dp/p Optics of TL-2 CTF3 Collaboration meeting, January 2008, CERN

  23. Phase space distortion Continued… Off momentum particles (Y-Plane) R56 = +0.30m R56 = 0.00m R56 = -0.30m 1% dp/p -1% dp/p Optics of TL-2 CTF3 Collaboration meeting, January 2008, CERN

  24. Magnets and power supplies Optics of TL-2 CTF3 Collaboration meeting, January 2008, CERN

  25. Low dispersion optics Additional optics design for easy commissioning So far : Higher dispersion for T566 correction During Initial run : Low dispersion optics in which sextupoles not switched on R56 = -0.30m Optics of TL-2 CTF3 Collaboration meeting, January 2008, CERN

  26. Low dispersion optics Continued… R56 = 0.00m Optics of TL-2 CTF3 Collaboration meeting, January 2008, CERN

  27. Low dispersion optics Continued… R56 = +0.30m Optics of TL-2 CTF3 Collaboration meeting, January 2008, CERN

  28. Summary • Optics design for entire range of R56 using the available magnets (five new dipoles) completed and delivered to CERN • T566 corrected in whole range of tuning • Sextupole scheme is optimized for low phase space distortion • Additional Low dispersion optics for initial run (T566 ~ -1, while in high dispersion mode T566 ~ -3 to -41) incorporated. Optics of TL-2 CTF3 Collaboration meeting, January 2008, CERN

  29. Acknowledgements • Hans Braun • Gunther Geschonke • Frank Tecker Optics of TL-2 CTF3 Collaboration meeting, January 2008, CERN

  30. Thanking you Optics of TL-2 CTF3 Collaboration meeting, January 2008, CERN

  31. Optics of TL-2 CTF3 Collaboration meeting, January 2008, CERN

More Related