1 / 13

John Jarvis, Claudia Johnson & Liana Vetter

John Jarvis, Claudia Johnson & Liana Vetter. May 6, 2004. Description of Problem. Quest’s current gas marketing Oneok is sole purchaser 85% guaranteed monthly The remainder sold daily Pipeline serves as middleman Goal of the project

allayna
Download Presentation

John Jarvis, Claudia Johnson & Liana Vetter

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. John Jarvis, Claudia Johnson & Liana Vetter May 6, 2004

  2. Description of Problem • Quest’s current gas marketing • Oneok is sole purchaser • 85% guaranteed monthly • The remainder sold daily • Pipeline serves as middleman • Goal of the project • Analyze the market trends and forecasting accuracy of Quest • Determine what percentage is optimal to guarantee on contract • Create optimization model Quest can use monthly

  3. Variables Considered • Two different sale points • R&H: large and unstable • Housel: small and unstable • Historical data • Forecasted daily production by sale point (2004) • Actual daily production by sale point (2004) • Daily NYMEX prices (2002-2004) • Limits to set • Maximum days and amount in debt • Bounds on percentage to guarantee

  4. Limits to Set • Maximum days and amount in debt • Set limit of 2 days in debt based on 2004 data • Set limit of 10% of production in debt • Conservative limits to minimize risk in case of unexpected changes in production • Bounds on percentage to guarantee • Set upper limit as 95%, highest Quest has used • Set lower limit as 30% to protect against sharp decrease in production

  5. Market 2002-2004

  6. R&H Production 2004

  7. Non-Stochastic Model • In 5-day test case, user provides data: • Model returns output: • Revenue: $1,002

  8. Stochastic Model • Benefits of stochastic modeling • Incorporates uncertainty using probabilities of different scenarios • Calculates expected revenue based on market forecasts • Approximates actual production from forecast given • Example case • User provides data: • Model returns output: • Expected revenue: $1,039

  9. Stochastic Model with Regret • Regret – difference between optimal revenue and actual revenue • Benefits of regret • Solution does well in rising and falling market • Less sensitive to predicted probabilities • Example case • User provided data: • Model returns output: • Expected revenue: $1,037

  10. Sensitivity Analysis • Optimal monthly guarantee varies little when expected production data changes • Model is more sensitive to changes in market data

  11. Problems and Limitations • Problems encountered • Limited historical data • Multiple daily gas prices (strip price used) • Large variability of the gas market • Difference in production records from meter inconsistency • Limitations of the solution • Dependant on the market which is unpredictable • Stochastic variables are based on limited data

  12. Analysis and Recommendation • 50-55% should be guaranteed monthly if no market predictions added from Quest • Consequences of guaranteeing 50-55% • $18,000 additional revenue from January – March 2004 for R&H • $2,400 additional revenue from January – March 2004 for Housel • Regret model yields less additional profit than stochastic model but provides more consistency between months

  13. Interface • Questions asked by interface • Probability the market will rise • Sale point • Month to forecast, days in month • Expected initial NYMEX price • Forecasted daily production • Expected beginning debt • Results of interface • Creates data file for AMPL • Data file can be run with regret model to resolve each month

More Related