1 / 27

USING PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT TO IMPROVE THE PERFORMANCE OF GOVERNMENT:

USING PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT TO IMPROVE THE PERFORMANCE OF GOVERNMENT: A "MEGA-TREND" IN INTERNATIONAL PUBLIC MANAGEMENT National Civil Service Institute Examination Yuan Steve Kelman Weatherhead Professor of Public Management Harvard Kennedy School.

alka
Download Presentation

USING PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT TO IMPROVE THE PERFORMANCE OF GOVERNMENT:

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. USING PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT TO IMPROVE THE PERFORMANCE OF GOVERNMENT: A "MEGA-TREND" IN INTERNATIONAL PUBLIC MANAGEMENT National Civil Service Institute Examination Yuan Steve Kelman Weatherhead Professor of Public Management Harvard Kennedy School

  2. USE OF PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENTA “MEGA-TREND” IN PUBLIC MANAGEMENT • AUSTRALIA/NEW ZEALAND (1980s) • UK “TARGETS” UNDER THATCHER/MAJOR/BLAIR • US GOVERNMENT PERFORMANCE AND RESULTS ACT (1993) • CHINA (MOSTLY FOR PROMOTION/DISCIPLINE OF SENIOR OFFICIALS)

  3. INTEREST IN PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT = INTEREST IN RESULTS GOVERNMENT DELIVERS

  4. PERFORMANCE MEASURES ARE THE PUBLIC SECTOR'S EQUIVALENT TO THE PROFIT MEASURE FOR BUSINESS FIRMS!

  5. UK – COVENTRY YOUTH OFFENDING SERVICE

  6. TWO VIEWS OF PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT • RECORDING – LIKE A THERMOMETER THAT MEASURES TEMPERATURE WITHOUT CHANGING IT A PAPER EXERCISE! • PERFORMANCE IMPROVEMENT / BEHAVIOR CHANGE “USE IT OR USELESS!”

  7. PERFORMANCE IMPROVEMENT APPROACH:WAYS MANAGERS CAN USE PERFORMANCE MEASURES • COMMUNICATION/FOCUS • MOTIVATION • LEARNING • RESOURCE ALLOCATION

  8. PERFORMANCE IMPROVEMENT APPROACH • COMMUNICATION/FOCUS • PRIORITIES: “WHAT GETS MEASURED GETS NOTICED” (CHINA ENVIRONMENTAL TARGETS ADDED TO GDP GROWTH) • SMALL NUMBER: “IF EVERYTHING IS A PRIORITY, NOTHING IS A PRIORITY” • PARTICULARLY IMPORTANT FROM TOP OF THE ORGANIZATION • MOTIVATION • LEARNING • RESOURCE ALLOCATION

  9. PERFORMANCE IMPROVEMENT APPROACH • COMMUNICATION • MOTIVATION • GOALS MOTIVATE VS. “DO YOUR BEST” • MOTIVATION OCCURS EVEN WITHOUT FINANCIAL REWARDS! • BEST GOALS ARE NOT TOO EASY BUT NOT IMPOSSIBLE • KENNEDY: “MAN TO THE MOON IN 10 YEARS” • BASIS FOR INDIVIDUAL AND/OR GROUP REWARDS? • LEARNING • RESOURCE ALLOCATION

  10. PERFORMANCE IMPROVEMENT APPROACH • COMMUNICATION • MOTIVATION • LEARNING • NEED DATA ABOUT PERFORMANCE AS BASIS FOR LEARNING ABOUT WHAT’S WORKING AND NOT WORKING • FEEDBACK ON YOUR OWN PERFORMANCE OVER TIME – LEARNING TO THROW DARTS IN A PUB • COMPARISON ACROSS UNITS DOING SIMILAR THINGS • “THERE IS NO GREATER WASTE THAN A GOOD IDEA USED ONLY ONCE.” • RESOURCE ALLOCATION

  11. PERFORMANCE IMPROVEMENT APPROACH • COMMUNICATION • MOTIVATION • LEARNING • RESOURCE ALLOCATION • TIME/ATTENTION • CONCENTRATE ON WORST? • BUDGET ALLOCATION WITHIN ORGANIZATION

  12. PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT… • THE GOOD NEWS: YOU GET MORE OF WHAT YOU MEASURE • THE BAD NEWS: YOU GET MORE OF WHAT YOU MEASURE • PROBLEM: “TEACH TO THE TEST”

  13. “TEACH TO THE TEST” (I): GOAL IS FINE, MEASURE OF THE GOAL IS POOR “TEACH TO THE TEST” (II): MEASURE IS FINE MEASURE OF GOAL, BUT IGNORES OTHER GOALS “TEACH TO THE TEST” (III): GAMING/CHEATING

  14. “TEACH TO THE TEST” (I): GOAL IS FINE, MEASURE OF THE GOAL IS POOR • USING SHORT-RUN EARNINGS INCREASES FOR JOB TRAINING PROGRAM GRADUATES AS A MEASURE OF PROGRAM EFFECTIVENESS “TEACH TO THE TEST” (II): MEASURE IS FINE MEASURE OF GOAL, BUT IGNORES OTHER GOALS “TEACH TO THE TEST” (III): GAMING/CHEATING

  15. “TEACH TO THE TEST” (I): GOAL IS FINE, MEASURE OF THE GOAL IS POOR “TEACH TO THE TEST” (II): MEASURE IS FINE MEASURE OF GOAL, BUT IGNORES OTHER GOALS • QUANTITY/SPEED VERSUS QUALITY “TEACH TO THE TEST” (III): GAMING/CHEATING

  16. “TEACH TO THE TEST” (I): GOAL IS FINE, MEASURE OF THE GOAL IS POOR “TEACH TO THE TEST” (II): MEASURE IS FINE MEASURE OF GOAL, BUT IGNORES OTHER GOALS “TEACH TO THE TEST” (III): GAMING/CHEATING • AIRLINE ONTIME PERFORMANCE • CHINA PRISONS FOR PETITIONERS

  17. PROBLEMS DON’T NECESSARILY MEAN DON’T USE PERFORMANCE MEASURES • EVERY MEASURE DISTORTS • DON’T LET THE PERFECT BE THE ENEMY OF THE GOOD

  18. PerformanceUsing Imperfect Measures PerformanceUsing Perfect Measures ? ? PerformanceUsing No Measures PerformanceUsing No Measures Worst Performance Best Performance

  19. SUMMARY MESSAGE: • INCORPORATE PERFORMANCE MEASURES AS AN IMPORTANT PART OF THE WAY YOU MANAGE AND LEAD YOUR ORGANIZATION • USE PERFORMANCE MEASURES NOT JUST TO RECORD YOUR ORGANIZATION’S PERFORMANCE, BUT TO IMPROVE IT

  20. http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/expectmore/

  21. http://www.nyc.gov/html/ops/cpr/html/home/home.shtml

  22. http://www.innovations.harvard.edu/showdoc.html?id=7100

  23. Shelley Metzenbaum “Performance Accountability: The Five Building Blocks and Six Essential Practices” http://www.businessofgovernment.org/pdfs/MetzenbaumReport2.pdf

  24. -End- Thank You.

More Related