1 / 14

Big Question

The Legal Edge: Solving Today’s Construction Problems Texas Housing Conference July 28-30, 2014 Hilton Hotel Austin, TX. Presenters Moderator Bobby Bowling, Tropicana Homes Panel Members Vijay D'Cruz , Locke Lord Joe Davis, Husch Blackwell Chris Ryman, Coats | Rose.

aliza
Download Presentation

Big Question

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. The Legal Edge: Solving Today’s Construction ProblemsTexas Housing ConferenceJuly 28-30, 2014Hilton HotelAustin, TX

  2. PresentersModeratorBobby Bowling, Tropicana HomesPanel MembersVijay D'Cruz, Locke LordJoe Davis, Husch Blackwell Chris Ryman, Coats | Rose

  3. RECENT SUPREME COURT DECISIONS LIMITING REMEDIES FORERRORS BY DESIGN PROFESSIONALSJoe Davis, Husch Blackwell

  4. Big Question What is the remedy against a design professional whose error causes economic damage to someone with whom it has no contract (like a visitor, or the general contractor)?

  5. “Economic Loss Rule” Tort damages (“liability not based on a contract or a statute”) are unavailable when the plaintiff sues for breach of a contractual duty, rather than a duty imposed by law. “When the injury is only the economic loss to the subject of a contract itself the action sounds in contract alone.” Southwestern Bell Tel. Co. v. DeLanney, 809 S.W.2d 493, 494-495 (Tex. 1991).

  6. "[W]e have never held that [the economic loss rule] precludes recovery between contractual strangers in a case not involving a defective product." • Sharyland Water Supply Corp. v. City of Alton, 254 S.W.3d 407, 410-20 (Tex. 2011).

  7. Negligent Misrepresentation RESTATEMENT (SECOND) OF TORTS §552; McCamish, Martin, Brown & Loeffler v. F.E. Appling Interests, 991 S.W.2d 787, 791 (Tex. 1999).

  8. "[W]hile a non-client cannot recover against a lawyer for negligence, a lawyer may be liable for negligent misrepresentation to a non-client when”: • information is transferred by an attorney to a known party for a known purpose”, • liability is not expressly limited or disclaimed but invited, and • the claimant has justifiably relied on a lawyer’s representation of material fact. • McCamish, Martin, Brown & Loeffler v. F.E. Appling Interests, 991 S.W.2d 787, 794 (Tex. 1999).

  9. “[A]n accountant may be liable to a strictly limited group of investors who justifiably rely on negligent misrepresentations in a corporate audit report.” • McCamish, Martin, Brown & Loeffler v. F.E. Appling Interests, 991 S.W.2d 787, 794 (Tex. 1999).

  10. Negligent Misrepresentation RESTATEMENT (SECOND) OF TORTS §552; McCamish, Martin, Brown & Loeffler v. F.E. Appling Interests, 991 S.W.2d 787, 791 (Tex. 1999).

  11. New Texas Supreme Court CaseConcerning Design Professionals Martin K. Eby Constr. Co. v. LAN/STV, No. 11-0810 (Tex.) Argued October 8, 2013 Opinion issued June 20, 2014

  12. Martin Eby – Concerns Expressed from the Bench Where is the remedy for the contractor? Why is the remedy against DART legally inadequate? Couldn’t DART sue LAN/STV and pass through damages to the contractor? Will granting a remedy to the contractor turn entire construction site into a tort lawsuit?

  13. Martin Eby - Opinion by Justice Hecht • Applied the economic loss rule to bar claims of negligent misrepresentation by a contractors against an architect hired by the owner • Rejected the comment in Restatement (Third) that would allow liability for economic loss caused by negligent design or misrepresentation • Determined that the parties should allocate the risk of design errors by their contracts, rather than asking the Courts to allocate the risk

  14. Questions?

More Related