1 / 18

TPSG4 validation at HighRadMat #6

TPSG4 validation at HighRadMat #6. Cedric Baud, B. Balhan, Jan Borburgh , Brennan Goddard, Wim Weterings. Contents. Scope Diluter calculations Validations of calculations Beam conditions Post irradiations steps References. Scope. 2 types of septa protection elements exist in the SPS:

alissa
Download Presentation

TPSG4 validation at HighRadMat #6

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. TPSG4 validation at HighRadMat #6 Cedric Baud, B. Balhan, Jan Borburgh, Brennan Goddard, Wim Weterings

  2. Contents • Scope • Diluter calculations • Validations of calculations • Beam conditions • Post irradiations steps • References

  3. Scope 2 types of septa protection elements exist in the SPS: • TPSG4, diluter to protect thick MSE septa in LSS4 SPS • TPSG6, diluter to protect thin MST septa in LSS6 SPS The first to be constructed and installed was TPSG4 phase 1 (in 2003). Developments from work on TCDS and TPSG6 showed that upgrade was needed for TPSG4 as well (phase 2, installed 2005) [5]. LIU-SPS beam parameters now available – more challenging for these protection devices (a phase 3 will be needed). All designs are based on simulations – need benchmarking.

  4. Purpose of TPSG’s • Protect Magnetic septa (MS downstream) from damage by the beam. • Protect MS copper coil from being deformed → ΔT <80 K • Limit water pressure rise in cooling channels of MS coil ΔP < 25 bar (tpsg6 to protect thin septum MST) (→ ΔT < 8 K) ΔP < 50 bar (tpsg4 to protect thick septum MSE) (→ ΔT < 15 K)

  5. SPS LSS4 extraction layout (top view) SPS LSS4: 6 MSE TPSG4;3800 kg

  6. MSE • Aperture: 20 x 63.5 mm2 • Water cooled copper conductor • Vacuum 5.10-9 mbar • Cooling flow per magnet: 160 l/min • Water speed in septum: 9 m/s • Operating water pressure: 24 bars • Weight of full tank 2270 kg • Static water pressure test: 80 bars • Bake-able at 150°C

  7. TPSG4 • Active length: 3000 mm • RP shielding under vacuum • Absorber blocks are edge cooled to cope with continuous losses • Dry weight 3800 kg • Under vacuum, operating pressure in 10-9 mbar range

  8. Diluter calculations • Nuclear calculations were done at CERN • Thermal and mechanical dynamic calculations were done at CRS4 (Sicily) [2,3] • Results were presented workshop on Materials for Collimators and Beam Absorbers (3-5 September 2007) @ CERN [4]

  9. TPSG4 beam diluter • In the first design (phase 1) the TPSG4 was 3.0 long and had the following material composition: 2.4m of graphite, 0.3m of a titanium alloy, and 0.3m of a Nickel based alloy • The design has then been modified by substituting several graphite blocks with a CfCcomposite and by adding another 10cm long graphite block • The three section were composed of several blocks each having a cross section of 30 x 19.25 mm, the block length is 240-300mm CZ5 Phase 1 CfC1.75 Ti 6Al 4V INCO718 Phase 2

  10. TPSG4 beam load • For the purpose of the analysis, the LHC ultimate beam intensity is considered as the worst case • Intensity will increase with LIU-SPS (for HL-LHC), to around 2.5e11 p+/b, and beam sizes will also be smaller (0.75 and 0.30 mm in H/V) with reduced emittance

  11. TPSG4 phase 2 results: diluter temperature increase • The temperature increase is similar to the results of phase 1 • The max ΔT is found in the 1st and 2nd blocks, the beam is also highly focalized • The additional graphite block in phase 2 compensates the effect of the lower density of CfC.

  12. TPSG4 phase 2 results: max Stassi ratio • The CfCgreatly reduces the resulting equivalent stresses • The results are acceptable for the graphite block, are well below the failure limit for the CfC • The stress ratio is high for the Ti and Inconel blocks, but these alloys have a ductile behavior Need beam test to see how this fails

  13. CfC anisotropy Young’s modulus for the TCDS materials as a function of the temperature (detail)

  14. Validation of calculation • Presently several extraction protection equipments are installed in SPS and LHC (TPSG4, TPSG6, TPSN, TCDS, TCDQ). • Protection of the downstream equipment relies fully on effectiveness of these diluters! • All designs are based on simulation results. • High energy variants (as in use in SPS and LHC) use CfC and graphite, with non isotropic mechanical properties. • Validation of design is required: • for the behaviour of the non isotropic CfC • for the assumption that exceeding the Stassi limit for ductile materials is acceptable (Ti and Inconel blocks) • To demonstrate the MSE is properly protected by TPSG4

  15. Proposed HighRadMat test set-up Pumping module MSE (second choice spare) TPSG4 (operational spare) • Required: • vacuum gauges and ion pumps power supplies, for logging and pumping • water pressure in MSE coil (24 bar) (MSE not powered, so no real cooling needed, but water under pressure needed, logging only possible at the coil entrance) • BLMs • Other diagnostics for TPSG – laser vibrometer etc. being discussed • Installation and dismantling under nitrogen flow to achieve good vacuum

  16. Beam conditions Ideally, proton beam: 1.7.1011/bunch, 288 bunches, 3.75 μm, 1.0 mm H x 0.4 mm V Requested beam time: 4 h Beam parameters: 1 mm H, 0.4 mm V Beam intensity: pilot + ultimate Intensity ramped up in steps: 5.1012, 1.1013, 2.1013, 3.1013, 4.1013, 5.1013

  17. Post-irradiatonanalysis steps • Evaluate data logged during test (vacuum, pressure, temperature, intensity, BLM’s). • ALARA analysis needed • Leak test of MSE coil • Disassembly of TPSG4: inspection of absorber blocks • Repair of TPSG4, as needed • Renovate MSE

  18. References [1] HighRadMat experiment request, https://espace.cern.ch/hiradmat-sps/Beam%20Requests/HiRadMat_BeamRequestSurvey_HRM6_TPSGRP.docx [2] L.Massidda and F. Mura, “Dynamic Structural Analysis of the TPSG4 & TPSG6 Beam Diluters”, CRS4, Cagliari, Italy, June 2005. [3] L.Massidda and F. Mura, “Analysis of the Water Dynamics for the MSE-Coil and the MST-Coil”, CRS4, Cagliari, Italy, June 2005. [4] Workshop on Materials for Collimators and Beam Absorbers, CERN, 3-5 September 2007 [5] J. Borburgh et al., “MODIFICATIONS TO THE SPS LSS6 SEPTA FOR LHC AND THE SPS SEPTA DILUTERS”, EPAC2006, Edinburgh

More Related