1 / 17

UK WASTE OIL SECTOR PRESENTATION TO THE NIHWF 6 NOVEMBER 2003

Oil Recycling Association. UK WASTE OIL SECTOR PRESENTATION TO THE NIHWF 6 NOVEMBER 2003. Roger Creswell. What we will cover. Waste Oil Industry Overview Regulatory Framework Key Issues Summary of where we are today Why the HWF plays a role

alika-hays
Download Presentation

UK WASTE OIL SECTOR PRESENTATION TO THE NIHWF 6 NOVEMBER 2003

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Oil Recycling Association UK WASTE OIL SECTORPRESENTATION TO THE NIHWF6 NOVEMBER 2003 Roger Creswell

  2. What we will cover • Waste Oil Industry Overview • Regulatory Framework • Key Issues • Summary of where we are today • Why the HWF plays a role • What England, Wales and Scotland is thinking • Where would our Industry like to go

  3. 2003 UK Waste Oil • WASTE LUBRICANTS FROM AUTOMOTIVE/INDUSTRIAL AND INTERNATIONAL TRANSPORT USES • (WASTE OIL DIRECTIVE (WOD) RELEVANT) • COLLECTING 380,000 TPA { ~86% OF COLLECTABLE WOD OIL} • EXCELLENT EUROPEAN COLLECTION RECORD AND GOVERNMENT WISHES TO PROTECT THIS • + FURTHER 100,000 TPA OF WASTE FUELS (WASTE INCINERATION DIRECTIVE {WID}) DEPENDANT) • + IMPORTS FROM EC COUNTRIES

  4. LEGAL FRAMEWORK Framework Directive on Waste 75/442/EEC Directives Dangerous Substances and Dangerous Preparations 67/548 & 88/379 European Waste Catalogue Directive 75/439/EEC on the disposal of waste oilsmodified by 87/101/EEC Hazardous Waste Directive Directive 91/692/EEC standardizing and rationalizing reports Directive 92/81/EEC on the harmonization of the structures of excise duties on mineral oils Directive 96/59/EC on the disposal of PCBs and PCTs Directive 2000/76/EC on the incineration of waste Directives 96/91 on IPPC and 99/31 on Landfill

  5. Focus of Legislation • Waste Oil Directive - Requires a PRIORITY to Regenerate the Lubricating Oil content of the waste • Waste Incineration Directive - Covers recovery and disposal - Strict Rules and Emissions Control

  6. 2003 Industry Practice • (NEARLY) ALL UK WASTE OIL IS PROCESSED TO RECOVERED FUEL OIL (RFO) • TWO HISTORIC KEY MARKETS: • 6 COAL FIRED POWER STATIONS AND ROAD STONE DRYING. • ABOUT 50/50 OVERALL VOLUME AND REGIONALLY DISTORTED USERS PAY POSITIVE PRICES • RFO MUST COMPETE AT A DISCOUNT TO ‘VIRGIN’ DUTY PAID HEAVY FUEL OIL OR GAS OIL • COLLECTORS COSTS ARE LARGELY PEOPLE, TRANSPORT & OVERHEADS. PRICE IS A FUNCTION OF CRUDE • A HIGH VOLUME/LOW MARGIN/ STATIC VOL CORE BUSINESS AND VERY COMPETITIVE

  7. Key Issues I • WASTE INCINERATION DIRECTIVE (RFO = A WASTE) • IMPACTS ON POSITIVE VALUE MARKETS • (1) COAL FIRED POWER GENERATION • - PROBABLY WASTE INCINERATION DIRECTIVE COMPLIANT • - CONFLICT WITH RENEWABLES OBLIGATION • (2) ROAD STONE DRIERS • PROBABLY NOT COMPLIANT – WHAT TO DO - BIG NI ISSUE? • (3) NEW MARKETS: • CEMENT INDUSTRY - BUT LOW TO NEGATIVE VALUE • STEEL INDUSTRY – CHEMICAL REDUCING AGENT (EC AGREED BUT REGIONAL) • REGENERATION / RE-REFINING?

  8. Key Issues II RE: WASTE OIL DIRECTIVE • GOVERNMENT TO RESPOND TO EC LEGAL PROCEEDINGS & INCENTIVISE REGENERATION? • MAJOR OIL SEES BARRIERS TO RE-REFINING (UNECONOMIC/TECHNICAL CONSTRAINTS) • UK GOV UNLIKELY TO CONFRONT ‘BIG OIL’ NEED A POLICY DECISION - A LONG WAY OFF ?

  9. Key Issues III • DUTY DEROGATION ON WASTE OIL FUEL (APPROX 4ppl) ON WASTE DERIVED FUEL OIL, ALLOWED UNTIL END OF 2006 • REMEMBER: TO SELL AS FUEL (RFO) IT MUST BE CHEAPER THAN NEW HFO THAT IS DUTY PAID • ADDING DUTY WOULD BE 50% of CURRENT RFO COST – THIS WOULD PUSH BACK DUTY AND COSTS TO WASTE PRODUCER?? LOGIC - FITS POLLUTER PAYS PRINCIPLE • BUT, GOVERNMENT CONCERNED THIS ENCOURAGES ILLEGAL DUMPING AND REDUCE THE COLLECTION RATE

  10. Summary so far: • AN ABSENCE OF CLEAR POLICY ON HOW THE WOD AND WOD WILL IMPACT ON BUSINESSES • FUEL OIL MARKETS WILL BE WID AND DUTY CONSTRAINED BY 2005/6 • COSTS MOVING BACK TO WASTE GENERATORS AND CONCERN IS OVER ILLEGAL DUMPING • UK OIL COLLECTORS FACE GREAT UNCERTAINTY • LITTLE INVESTMENT PLANNEDBY BUSINESS

  11. For Governments, the bigger picture of uncertainties • WASTE OIL/OILY WATER IS THE LARGEST ELEMENT OF HAZARDOUS WASTE MOVEMENTS > 20% • DEFRA HAZARDOUS WASTE FORUM FORMED & ORA IS A MEMBER • IMPACT OF WID/WOD/PPC/LANDFILL DIRECTIVES HAS MADE WASTE OIL THE PRIORITY WASTE STREAM • FORMATION OF REGIONAL HWF’s

  12. What Is UK Government Doing? RE: WASTE INCINERATION DIRECTIVE - INTERPRETING • ‘VERY LITTLE COMPROMISE’ ALLOWED • THERMAL PROCESSING TO FUEL - THE OUTPUT IS STILL A WASTE AND UNDER WID i.e. not a product • WHERE INCINERATION TAKES PLACE CO-INCINERATION IS RECOVERY and PREFERRED(R)TO DISPOSAL (D) E.G. HIGH TEMP INCINERATION USES • SMALL BURNERS. EXEMPTION. SCOTLAND Vs ENGLAND MISMATCH – BREAKS A MAJOR HWF RECOMMENDATION • UNDERSTANDS THE EC CASE FOR REGENERATION ACCEPTING THAT POLITICS IS AN ISSUE

  13. What Is Government Doing? RE: WASTE OIL DIRECTIVE • A LOT OF THINKING!! • PREPARING ITS RESPONSE to THE EC PROCEEDINGS & UNDERTAKING STUDIES TO SHOW COMMITMENT • UNDERSTANDS THE EC CASE FOR REGENERATION ACCEPTING THAT ECONOMICS AND SCIENCE CAN BE UNSOUND • OUTCOME?: WANTS TO FIND A COMPROMISE THAT FITS ITS HAZARDOUS WASTE PROGRAMME WITHOUT USING TOO MUCH GOVERNMENT MONEY IN PRIVATE INDUSTRY

  14. What Is Government Doing? ANALYSTS SUGGEST • NO DIRECT CAPITAL GRANTS FOR REGENERATION (NOT SEEN AS COST EFFECTIVE) • FORCING THE USE OF RE- REFINED OIL INTO MARKETS WILL NOT BE SUCCESSFUL • THE ENDING OF DUTY DEROGATION ON RECOVERED FUELS • TRYING TO FIND A SOLUTION THAT BRINGS ‘BIG OIL’ INTO THE PICTURE – PRODUCER RESPONSIBILITY? • COLLECTORS WOULD BE ABLE TO INVEST IN PARTNERSHIPS AS VERY DOUBTFUL IF OIL COMPANIES WOULD WANT TO MANAGE WASTE OPERATIONS • THIS WOULD FAVOUR ‘GOOD RE-REFINING’ BUT VERY LIMITED IN SCOPE (ONE 100,000 t plant?) UNLIKELY OPTION FOR NI

  15. What Output the Waste Oil Industry Would Like to see • CLEAR GUIDANCE ON THE WASTE INCINERATION DIRECTIVE • RECOGNITION THAT MUCH WASTE OIL WILL NEED TO BE COMBUSTED • PREVENTION OF THE SMALL BURNER EXEMPTION • GOVERNMENT POLICY MADE CLEAR ON THE WASTE OIL DIRECTIVE • BUILD PARTNERSHIPS WITH REGULATORS /OIL SUPPLIERS • STIMULATING INVESTMENT IN TECHNOLOGY, PROMOTING RECOVERY • OVER DISPOSAL • A RETURN TO SECURE PROFITS

  16. Importance of Timing • DECEMBER 2005 IS A BRICK WALL (IMPACT OF WID) • SECTOR PPC DUE MID 2005 –INVESTMENT BUT RISKY • STRESSES THE IMPORTANCE OF THE HWF’s

  17. Presented by: • Roger Creswell Oil Recycling Association OilRecyclingAsso@aol.com Tel +44 (0) 1279 814035

More Related