1 / 8

Calibrating Achievable Design Roundtable Discussion June 9, 2002

Calibrating Achievable Design Roundtable Discussion June 9, 2002. Wayne Dai, Andrew Kahng, Tsu-Jae King, Wojciech Maly, Igor Markov, Herman Schmit, Dennis Sylvester. Facilitator: Bill Joyner, IBM/SRC. Recent Progress in Technology Extrapolation and GTX.

alia
Download Presentation

Calibrating Achievable Design Roundtable Discussion June 9, 2002

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Calibrating Achievable Design Roundtable Discussion June 9, 2002 Wayne Dai, Andrew Kahng, Tsu-Jae King, Wojciech Maly, Igor Markov, Herman Schmit, Dennis Sylvester Facilitator: Bill Joyner, IBM/SRC

  2. Recent Progress in Technology Extrapolation and GTX • Transition-aware and active-shielding global signaling approaches, RLC interconnect performance models • Taxonomy and correlated models of process variability, and framework for examining impact on achievable design • New DRAM access time model in support of eDRAM vs. multi-die cost/performance model • Release of ITRS-2001 ORTCs in GTX • Updated GTX version in Sematech ITRS-2001 website • Enhancements in June02 release • Ongoing studies, modeling of ITRS “shared red bricks” • Low-k benefit, variability tolerance of design, design-limiting process rules, …

  3. Recent Progress in CAD-IP Reuse • Prototype release of Bookshelf.exe • New infrastructure that hosts executable Bookshelf content and allows remote execution • Web interface, distributed computation platform, and scripting capabilities • New tilable (i.e., scalable) circuit benchmarks • Network tile • Processing elements (floating-point adder, floating-point multiplier, programmable FIR filter) • Initial discussions of OpenAccess API and data model • Benchmark scaling approaches

  4. Recent Progress in METRICS • Expanded METRICS system to front-end acceptance and clock tree synthesis domains • Work with STRJ-WG1 (Japan Roadmap group) to obtain design quality / value survey questions that will be used to survey U.S. companies • Started to propagate open-source METRICS system available to university user group communities • Exploring potential links to Bookshelf.exe • METRICS Birds-of-Feather meeting at DAC-2002 • Developing and applying machine learning techniques to improve existing data mining and regression infrastructure

  5. Summary: Roles of the C.A.D. Theme • Identify best opportunities for “sharing of red bricks” between EDA and other semiconductor supplier industries • GTX studies + Manufacturing Calibration: Is low-k worth the development cost? What is the best interconnect process architecture for 65nm? What FEOL and BEOL variabilities can designers tolerate? What is the most cost-effective memory-logic integration? • Repository of best known methods, models, metrics • Connects applications and drivers (e.g., ITRS MPU, SOC) to technology roadmap • Connects algorithm (e.g., Fabrics) and design technology (e.g., Power-Energy) within GSRC and to designs, interconnects, devices, and materials (= other FRCs) • Agent of culture change • Measurement & characterization of EDA • Open-source CAD-IP; vertical benchmarking • New vectors: e.g., reusable curriculum IP for VLSI, VLSI design, VLSI design technology education C.A.D. Theme Semi Industry ITRS Living ITRS Models and Calibrations Design Houses What is the design problem? How should Design help solve ITRS red bricks? VLSI Design Education Manufacturing Calibration Open-Source CAD-IP Other FRCs METRICS & Design Process Opt Other GSRC Themes EDA Industry & Academia

  6. C.A.D. Theme Draft Roadmap Interactions o NEMI, C2S2 FRC – app roadmaps o Fabrics– “SIP design tech backplane” o Fabrics Theme – Bookshelf, flows research o ITRS community o Power-Energy Theme – capture/guide o MSD FRC – mfg calibration, manufacturability shared red bricks o Self-Test Theme – capture/guide o Interconnect FRC – model/calib, mfg/var shared red bricks o NSF (education) 1/01 Today 1/99 1/04 1/05 1/03 1/01 Today 1/99 1/04 1/05 1/03 o Natl VLSI design curriculum initiative Initiatives and Milestones o ITRS “shared red brick” modeling, analysis, roadmapping o Vertical benchmarks: cell libraries, DSP, netwk o 30% of ITRS in GTX o Bookshelf @ 25 slots, first papers o METRICS  broader academic release o GTX model dirs = mfg cost/cal, global sig, mem-logic, app domains o “SIP design tech backplane” is METRICized o BX.exe v.1 o METRICS v.1 + start industry integration o GTX v.2 (with ITRS-2001) o GTX v.1 + ITRS support o BK 25% PD adopt, 50% slot interop o Fabrics  C.A.D. + Constructive Fabrics Themes o Open-source RTL-GDSII flow o Start Fabrics Thrust, initial data model / flow discussions

  7. Foci of Industry Feedback and Interaction • OpenAccess (common data model) – what is GSRC doing? • CAD-IP reuse – Bookshelf Slots, codes, functionality • Benchmarks – “industry-strength validation of research” • Education initiative? • National-scale VLSI education infrastructure • ITRS needs (= how to best share “red bricks”) • Incremental benefits of lower k • “Optimal interconnect stack”? (balancing power delivery, routing density, delay and signal integrity performance, …) • “What variability can designers tolerate?” • ESD protection impact on off-chip signaling bandwidth • Understanding how ground rules impact layout density • What else?

  8. RoundtableDiscussion Questions • For our industrial partners: in your designs, what is the largest problem that you face ? • And how does the research work in this Theme help? • What is being done well in this Theme? • What could be improved? • On one or two slides (max), each industrial co-facilitator please summarize key conclusions from this discussion.Questions and issues for discussion not restricted to this set.

More Related