Download

Chapter 5 Effect of Noise on Analog Communication Systems






Advertisement
/ 103 []
Download Presentation
Comments
aleta
From:
|  
(667) |   (0) |   (0)
Views: 343 | Added: 06-08-2012
Rate Presentation: 0 0
Description:
Chapter 5 Effect of Noise on Analog Communication Systems. Outline. Chapter 5 Effect of Noise on Analog Communication Systems 5.1 Effect of Noise on linear-Modulation Systems 5.1.1 Effect of noise on a baseband system 5.1.2 Effect of noise on DSB-SC AM 5.1.3 Effect of noise on SSB AM
Chapter 5 Effect of Noise on Analog Communication Systems

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only and may not be sold or licensed nor shared on other sites. SlideServe reserves the right to change this policy at anytime. While downloading, If for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.











- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -




Slide 1

Chapter 5Effect of Noise on Analog Communication Systems

Slide 2

Outline

  • Chapter 5 Effect of Noise on Analog Communication Systems

    • 5.1 Effect of Noise on linear-Modulation Systems

      • 5.1.1 Effect of noise on a baseband system

      • 5.1.2 Effect of noise on DSB-SC AM

      • 5.1.3 Effect of noise on SSB AM

      • 5.1.4 Effect of noise on conventional

    • 5.2 Carrier-Phase Estimation with a phase-Locked Loop (PLL)

      • 5.2.1 The phase-locked loop (PLL)

      • 5.2.2 Effect of additive noise on phase estimation

    • 5.3 Effect of noise on angle modulation

      • 5..3.1 Threshold effect in angle modulation

      • 5.3.2 Pre-emphasis and De-emphasis filtering

    • 5.4 Comparison of analog-modulation systems

2

Slide 3

Outline

  • 5.5 Effects of transmission losses and noise in analog communication systems

    • 5.5.1 Characterization of thermal noise sources

    • 5.5.2 Effective noise temperature and noise figure

    • 5.5.3 Transmission losses

    • 5.5.4 Repeaters for signal transmission

  • 5.6 Further reading

3

Slide 4

5 Effect of Noise on Analog Communication Systems

  • The effect of noise on various analog communication systems will be analysis in this chapter.

  • Angle-modulation systems and particularly FM, can provide a high degree of noise immunity, and therefore are desirable in cases of severe noise and/or low signal power.

  • The noise immunity is obtained at the price of sacrificing channel bandwidth because he bandwidth requirements of angle-modulation systems is considerably higher than amplitude-modulation systems.

4

Slide 5

5.1 Effect of Noise on linear-Modulation Systems(1) Baseband system

  • (1) Baseband system

baseband

5

Slide 6

5.1 Effect of Noise on linear-Modulation Systems (2) DSB-SC AM

  • (2) DSB-SC AM

6

Slide 7

5.1 Effect of Noise on linear-Modulation Systems (2) DSB-SC AM

  • Coherent demodulation

7

Slide 8

5.1 Effect of Noise on linear-Modulation Systems (2) DSB-SC AM

  • If PLL is employed

  • Assume

  • Message power :

8

Slide 9

5.1 Effect of Noise on linear-Modulation Systems (2) DSB-SC AM

  • Noise power :

    Note that :

9

Slide 10

5.1 Effect of Noise on linear-Modulation Systems (2) DSB-SC AM

10

Slide 11

5.1 Effect of Noise on linear-Modulation Systems(3) SSB-AM

  • (3) SSB-AM

    with ideal-phase coherent demodulator

11

Slide 12

5.1 Effect of Noise on linear-Modulation Systems(3) SSB-AM

12

Slide 13

5.1 Effect of Noise on linear-Modulation Systems(4) Conventional AM

  • (4) Conventional AM

    for synchronous demodulation (similar to DSB, except using

    instead of m(t) )

    by a dc block

13

Slide 14

5.1 Effect of Noise on linear-Modulation Systems(4) Conventional AM

but

14

Slide 15

5.1 Effect of Noise on linear-Modulation Systems(4) Conventional AM

In practical application :

15

Slide 16

5.1 Effect of Noise on linear-Modulation Systems(4) Conventional AM

Envelope detector

16

Slide 17

5.1 Effect of Noise on linear-Modulation Systems(4) Conventional AM

  • Case 1

    After removing the dc component,

    The same as y(t) for the synchronous demodulation, without the ½ coefficient

17

Slide 18

5.1 Effect of Noise on linear-Modulation Systems(4) Conventional AM

  • Case 2

18

Slide 19

5.1 Effect of Noise on linear-Modulation Systems(4) Conventional AM

Notes: i) Signal and noise components are no longer additive.

ii) Signal component is multiple by the noise and is no

longer distinguishable.

iii) no meaningful SNR can be defined.

  • It is said that this system is operating below the threshold

    ==> threshold effect

19

Slide 20

5.1 Effect of Noise on linear-Modulation Systems

20

Slide 21

5.1 Effect of Noise on linear-Modulation Systems

21

Slide 22

5.1 Effect of Noise on linear-Modulation Systems

22

Slide 23

5.2 Carrier-Phase Estimation with a phase-Locked Loop (PLL)

  • Consider DSB-SC AM

    assume , zero-mean (i.e. no dc component)

    the average power at the output of a narrow band filter

    tuned to the carrier frequency fc is zero.

23

Slide 24

5.2 Carrier-Phase Estimation with a phase-Locked Loop (PLL)

Let

There is signal power at the frequency , which can

be used to drive a PLL.

24

Slide 25

5.2 Carrier-Phase Estimation with a phase-Locked Loop (PLL)

  • The mean value of the output of Bandpass filter is a sinusoid with frequency , phase , and amplitude

    .

25

Slide 26

5.2.1 The phase-locked loop (PLL) )

  • If input to the PLL is and output of the

    VCO is , represents the estimate of , then

26

Slide 27

5.2.1 The phase-locked loop (PLL) )

  • Loop filter is a lowpass filter, dc is reserved as is removed.

  • It has transfer function

  • n(t) provide the control voltage for VCD (see section 5.3.3).

  • The VCO is basically a sinusoidal signal generation with an instantaneous phase given by

    where is a gain constant in radians/ volt-sec.

27

Slide 28

5.2.1 The phase-locked loop (PLL) )

  • The carrier-phase estimate at the output of VCO is :

    and its transfer function is .

  • Double-frequency terms resulting from the multiplication of the input signal to the loop with the output of the VCD is removed by the loop filter

    PLL can be represented by the closed-loop system model as follows.

28

Slide 29

5.2.1 The phase-locked loop (PLL) )

29

Slide 30

5.2.1 The phase-locked loop (PLL) )

  • In steady-state operation, when the loop is tracking the phase of the received carrier, is small.

  • With this approximation, PLL is represented the linear model shown below.

30

Slide 31

5.2.1 The phase-locked loop (PLL) )

closed-loop transfer function

where the factor of ½ has been absorbed into the gain parameter k

31

Slide 32

5.2.1 The phase-locked loop (PLL) )

  • The closed-loop system function of the linearized PLL is second order when the loop filter has a signal pole and signal zero.

  • The parameter determines the position of zero in H(s), while K, and control the position of the closed-loop system poles.

32

Slide 33

5.2.1 The phase-locked loop (PLL) )

  • The denominator of H(s) may be expressed in the standard form

    where : loop-damping factor

    : natural frequency of the loop

33

Slide 34

5.2.1 The phase-locked loop (PLL) )

  • The magnitude response as a function of the normalized frequency is illustrated, with the damping factor as a parameter and .

34

Slide 35

5.2.1 The phase-locked loop (PLL) )

  • The one-side noise equivalent bandwidth

  • Trade-off between speed of response and noise in the phase estimate

35

Slide 36

5.2.2 Effect of additive noise on phase estimation

  • PLL is tracking a signal as

    which is corrupted by additive narrowband noise

    , are assumed to be statistically independent stationary Gaussian noise.

36

Slide 37

5.2.2 Effect of additive noise on phase estimation

  • Problem 4.29  a phase shift does not change the first two moments of nc(t) and ns(t).

    i.e. xc(t) and xs(t) have exactly the same statistical characteristics as nc(t) and ns(t).

37

Slide 38

5.2.2 Effect of additive noise on phase estimation

  • The equivalent model is shown as below

38

Slide 39

5.2.2 Effect of additive noise on phase estimation

  • When the power of the incoming signal is much larger than the noise power, .

  • Then we may linearize the PLL shown as bellow.

39

Slide 40

5.2.2 Effect of additive noise on phase estimation

is additive at the input to the loop, the variance of the phase error , which is also the variance of the VCO output phase is

Bneq : one-sided noise equivalent bandwidth of the loop, given by

40

Slide 41

5.2.2 Effect of additive noise on phase estimation

  • Note that is the power of the input sinusoid, and is simply proportional to the total noise power with the bandwidth of the PLL divided by the input signal power, hence

    where is defined as the SNR

    Thus, the variance of is inversely proportional to the SNR.

41

Slide 42

5.2.2 Effect of additive noise on phase estimation

  • Note : the variance of linear model is close to the exact variance for

42

Slide 43

5.2.2 Effect of additive noise on phase estimation

43

Slide 44

5.2.2 Effect of additive noise on phase estimation

  • By computing the autocorrelation and power spectral density of these two noise component, one can show that both components have spectral power in frequency band centered at 2 fc.

  • Let’s select Bneq << Bbp, then total noise spectrum at the input to PLL may be approximated by a constant with the loop bandwidth.

44

Slide 45

5.2.2 Effect of additive noise on phase estimation

  • This approximation allows us to obtain a simple expression for the variance of the phase error as

    where SL is called the squaring loss and is given as

    since SL<1 , we have an increase in the variance of the phase error caused by the added noise power that results from the squaring operation.

  • E.g. if the loss is 3dB or equivalently, the variance in the estimate increase by a factor of 2.

45

Slide 46

5.2.2 Effect of additive noise on phase estimation

  • Costas loop

46

Slide 47

5.2.2 Effect of additive noise on phase estimation

47

Slide 48

5.2.2 Effect of additive noise on phase estimation

48

Slide 49

5.2.2 Effect of additive noise on phase estimation

49

Slide 50

5.2.2 Effect of additive noise on phase estimation

  • These terms (signal noise and noise noise) are similar to the two noise terms at the input of the PLL for the squaring method.

  • In fact, if the loop filter in the Costas loop is identical to that used in the squaring loop, the two loops are equivalent.

  • Under this condition the pdf of the phase error, and the performance of the two loops are identical.

  • In conclusion, the squaring PLL and the Costas PLL are two practical methods for deriving a carrier-phase estimation for synchronous demodulation of a DSB-SC AM signal.

50

Slide 51

5.3 Effect of noise on angle modulation

  • RX for a general angle-modulated signal

51

Slide 52

5.3 Effect of noise on angle modulation

  • Assume: signal power is much higher than noise power

    i.e.

52

Slide 53

5.3 Effect of noise on angle modulation

53

Slide 54

5.3 Effect of noise on angle modulation

Note that

54

Slide 55

5.3 Effect of noise on angle modulation

  • The output of the demodulator is

    where

    (noise component)

55

Slide 56

5.3 Effect of noise on angle modulation

  • Noise component

  • The autocorrelation function

56

Slide 57

5.3 Effect of noise on angle modulation

  • Assume m(t) is a sample function of a zero-mean stationary

    Gaussian process M(t) with autocorrelation

    then

  • is a zero-mean, stationary Gaussian process

57

Slide 58

5.3 Effect of noise on angle modulation

  • At any fixed time t, the random variable

    is the difference between two jointly Gaussian random variables.

  • is a Gaussian R.V. with zero mean and variance

58

Slide 59

5.3 Effect of noise on angle modulation

  • Autocorrelation function

59

Slide 60

5.3 Effect of noise on angle modulation

  • Power spectral density

    where and G(f) is its Fourier transform.

60

Slide 61

5.3 Effect of noise on angle modulation

  • The bandwidth of is half the bandwidth Bc of the angle-modulated signal, which for high modulation indices is much larger than W, the message bandwidth.

  • Since the bandwidth of the angle-modulated signal is defined as the frequencies that contain 98%-99% of the signal power, G(f) is very small in the neighborhood of and

61

Slide 62

5.3 Effect of noise on angle modulation

  • A typical example of G(f), and the result of their convolution is shown below.

62

Slide 63

5.3 Effect of noise on angle modulation

  • Because G(f) is very small in the neighborhood of ,

    the resulting SY(f) has almost a flat spectrum for , the bandwidth of the message.

    i.e. for | f |<W , the spectrum of the noise components in the PM and FM.

63

Slide 64

5.3 Effect of noise on angle modulation

  • The power spectrum of the noise component at the output of the demodulator in the frequency interval | f | < W for PM and FM is shown below.

64

Slide 65

5.3 Effect of noise on angle modulation

  • PM has a flat noise spectrum and FM has a parabolic noise spectrum.

  • The effect of noise in FM for higher-frequency components is much higher than the effect of noise on low-frequency components.

  • The noise power at the output of the lowpass filter is the noise power in the frequency range [ -W, +W ].

65

Slide 66

5.3 Effect of noise on angle modulation

  • Output signal power

  • The SNR

66

Slide 67

5.3 Effect of noise on angle modulation

  • Note that is the received signal power, denote by PR.

  • The output SNR

67

Slide 68

5.3 Effect of noise on angle modulation

  • Let

  • The output SNR of a baseband system with the same received power

68

Slide 69

5.3 Effect of noise on angle modulation

  • Note that in the above expression is the average-to-peak power ratio of the message signal (or, equivalently, the power content of normalized message, ).

  • Therefore,

69

Slide 70

5.3 Effect of noise on angle modulation

  • Carson’s rule

  • The ration of the channel bandwidth to the message

    bandwidth

  • We can express the output SNR in terms of the bandwidth expansion factor

70

Slide 71

5.3 Effect of noise on angle modulation

  • In both PM and FM, the output SNR is proportional to the square of the modulation index .

    • Therefore, increasing increases the output SNR even with low received power.

    • This is in contrast to amplitude modulation where such an increase in the received SNR is not possible.

  • The increase in the received SNR is obtained by increasing the bandwidth.

    • Therefore, angle modulation provides a way to trade-off bandwidth for transmitted power.

  • The relation between the output SNR and the bandwidth expansion factor, , is a quadratic relation.

    • This is far from optimal

71

Slide 72

5.3 Effect of noise on angle modulation

  • In fact, if we increase such that the approximation

    ( ) does not hold, a phenomenon known as the threshold effect will occur, and the signal will be lost in the noise.

  • A comparison of the above result with the SNR in amplitude modulation shows that, in both case, increasing the transmitter power will increase the output SNR, but the mechanisms are totally different.

  • In AM, any increase in the received power directly increases the signal power at the output of the receiver.

  • In FM, the effect of noise is higher at higher frequencies.

72

Slide 73

5.3.1 Threshold Effect in Angle Modulation

  • The noise analysis of angle demodulation schemes is based on the assumption that the SNR at the demodulator input is high.

  • This assumption of high SNR is a simplifying assumption that is usually made in analysis of nonlinear-modulation systems.

  • Threshold effect

    • There exists a specific signal to noise ratio at the input of the demodulator known as the threshold SNR, beyond which signal mutilation occurs.

    • The existence of the threshold effect places an upper limit on the trade-off between bandwidth and power in an FM system.

    • This limit is a practical limit in the value of the demodulation index .

    • Threshold in an FM system

73

Slide 74

5.3.1 Threshold Effect in Angle Modulation

  • In general, there are two factors that limit the value of the demodulation index .

    • The limitation on channel bandwidth which effects through Carson’s rule.

    • The limitation on the received power that limits the value of to less than what is derived from Equation .

74

Slide 75

5.3.1 Threshold Effect in Angle Modulation

75

Slide 76

5.3.1 Threshold Effect in Angle Modulation

76

Slide 77

5.3.1 Threshold Effect in Angle Modulation

77

Slide 78

5.3.1 Threshold Extension in Frequency modulation

  • In order to reduce the threshold, in other words, in order to delay the threshold effect to appear at lower-received signal power, it is sufficient to decrease the input-noise power at the receiver.

    • This can be done by increasing the effective system bandwidth at the receiver.

  • Two approaches to FM threshold extension are to employ FMFB or PLL-FM at the receiver.

  • In application where power is very limited and bandwidth is abundant, these systems can be employed to make it possible to use the available bandwidth more efficiently.

  • Using FMFB, the threshold can be extended approximately by 5 - 7 dB.

78

Slide 79

5.3.2 Pre-emphasis and De-emphasis Filtering

  • The objective in pre-emphasis and de-emphasis filtering is to design a system which behaved like an ordinary frequency modulator – demodulator pair in the low frequency band of the message signal and like a phase modulator – demodulator pair in the high-frequency band of the message signal.

  • At the demodulator , we need a filter that at low frequencies has a constant gain and at high frequencies behaves as an integrator.

  • The demodulator filter which emphasizes high frequencies is called the pre-emphasis filter and the demodulator filter which is the inverse of the modulator filter is called the de-emphasis filter.

79

Slide 80

5.3.2 Pre-emphasis and De-emphasis Filtering

80

Slide 81

5.3.2 Pre-emphasis and De-emphasis Filtering

  • The characteristics of the pre-emphasis and de-emphasis filters depend largely on the power-spectral density of the message process.

  • In commercial FM broadcasting of music and voice, the frequency response of the receiver (de-emphasis) filter is

    where

    is the 3-dB frequency of the filter

81

Slide 82

5.3.2 Pre-emphasis and De-emphasis Filtering

  • The noise component after the de-emphasis filter has a power spectral density

  • The noise power at the output of the demodulator

82

Slide 83

5.3.2 Pre-emphasis and De-emphasis Filtering

  • The ratio of the output SNRs

83

Slide 84

5.3.2 Pre-emphasis and De-emphasis Filtering

84

Slide 85

5.3.2 Pre-emphasis and De-emphasis Filtering

85

Slide 86

5.3.4 Comparison of Analog0Modulation System

  • Linear modulation system

    • DSB-SC

    • Conventional AM

    • SSB-SC

    • VSB

  • Nonlinear modulation system

    • FM

    • PM

86

Slide 87

5.3.4 Comparison of Analog0Modulation System

  • The bandwidth efficiency of the system

    • SSB-SC > SSB > VSB > DSB-SC > DSB

    • PM = FM

    • The most bandwidth-efficient analog communication system is the SSB-SC system with a transmission bandwidth equal to the signal bandwidth.

    • PM and particularly FM are least-favorable systems when bandwidth is the major concern, and their use is only justified by their high level of noise immunity.

87

Slide 88

5.3.4 Comparison of Analog0Modulation System

  • The power efficiency of the system

    • Angle-modulation scheme and particularly FM provide a high level of noise immunity and, therefore, power efficiency.

    • Conventional AM and VSB+C are least power-efficient system.

88

Slide 89

5.3.4 Comparison of Analog0Modulation System

  • The case of implementation of system

    • The simplest receiver structure is the receiver for conventional AM, and the structure of receiver for VSB+C system is only slightly more complicated.

    • FM receivers are also easy to implement.

    • DSB-SC and SSB-SC require synchronous demodulation and their receiver structure is much more complicated.

89

Slide 90

5.5 Effects of transmission losses and noise in analog communication systems

90

Slide 91

5.5.1 Characterization of thermal noise sources

91

Slide 92

5.5.1 Characterization of thermal noise sources

  • Based on quantum mechanics, the power-spectral density of thermal noise is

    where h is Planck’s constant, k is Boltzmann’s constant, and T is the temperature of the resistor in degree Kelvin, i.e., T=273+C, where C is in degrees Centigrade.

  • by

92

Slide 93

5.5.1 Characterization of thermal noise sources

  • The power spectral density of noise voltage across the load resistor is

93

Slide 94

5.5.2 Effective noise temperature and noise figure

  • Thermal noise converted to amplifier and load

94

Slide 95

5.5.2 Effective noise temperature and noise figure

  • The noise power at the output of the network is

  • Noise-equivalent bandwidth of the filter is defined as

  • The output noise power from an idea amplifier that introduces no additional noise

95

Slide 96

5.5.2 Effective noise temperature and noise figure

  • The noise figure of the amplifier is

96

Slide 97

5.5.3 Transmission losses

  • Transmission Loss

    L = PT / PR

    Ldb=10log L = 10log PT – 10log PR

97

Slide 98

5.5.3 Transmission losses

98

Slide 99

5.5.3 Transmission losses

99

Slide 100

5.5.3 Transmission losses

100

Slide 101

5.5.4 Repeaters for signal transmission

101

Slide 102

L

5.5.4 Repeaters for signal transmission

  • PR= PT / L

  • P0=gPR= gPT/ L

  • By g = L andP0= PT

  • The SNR at the output of the repeater is

102

Slide 103

5.5.4 Repeaters for signal transmission

103


Copyright © 2014 SlideServe. All rights reserved | Powered By DigitalOfficePro