III Russian – Norwegian Conference, Razvilka – Gazprom VNIIGAZ, 9th December 2010

1. Barents 2020 - Working Group RN01 Recommendation for structuring, editing and publishing of Phase IV deliverablesin Russia, Norway and internationally III Russian – Norwegian Conference, Razvilka – Gazprom VNIIGAZ, 9th December 2010 Tore Sildnes, RN01 co-ordinator

2. Barents 2020 Phase IV – RN01 Members

3. Working Group RN01 - Mandate for Phase IV • Recommend how Phase 3 recommendations and Phase 4 deliverables should be: • structured, • edited • and published to fit well into the collection of existing standards • Recommend how the relevant documents from Barents 2020 Phase 4 can be used in revision and/or development of new ISO standards

4. Options for final reporting • Barents 2020 technical report • Proposal for Guideline(s) or Recommended Practice(s) • GAZPROM (STO) • DNV (RP) • OGP • Proposal for identical Russian and Norwegian national supplementary standard to an ISO standard • GOST R Standard, Recommendation or “set of rules” • NS or NORSOK standard • Proposal for national annex to adopted ISO or EN-ISO standard • Proposal for ISO Technical Specification (TS) • Proposal for ISO Technical Report (TR) • Proposal for ISO Publicly Available Specification (PAS) • Proposal for ISO International Workshop Agreement (IWA) • Proposal for ISO Amendment to existing standard (Amd)

5. Selection Criteria • General agreement within RN01 that the preferred goal should be to seek to issue as much material as possible as ISO standards • This will facilitate the results to be recognised and used locally in arctic regions on a worldwide basis. • The working groups have differing: • scopes, • target groups • and technical maturity level for their tasks, • Recommendations on format of deliverables have thus been given individually for each group

6. How to propose an ISO Standard • Major challenge to achieve international consensus • Includes long ballot periods to assure time for all relevant parties to review and provide comments on the draft documents presented. • Typically the process can be described as follows: • 1. New work item proposal (NWIP) (by Norway/Russia) • 2. NWIP Ballot in ISO TC67 (3 months) by its 29 national P-members • 3. Development of draft ISO IS by ISO work group (6-12 months) • 4. Draft IS ballot (3 months) • 5. Review comments and agree final draft/document • 6. Final draft IS ballot (2 months) • 7. ISO to publish (3 months) • Timeline for the process: 24-48 months. • Development of an ISO Amd, TR and TS typically: 15-21 months. • Development of IWA, PAS typically 6-15 months

7. How to propose a GOST Rstandard • Major challenge to achieve national consensus on subject matter. • Typically the process can be described as follows: • 1. Submitting of a proposal to the Secretariat of TC • 2. Development of the first draft national standard (3-6 month) • 3. Review of first draft and public discussion (2-5 month) • 4. Development of the final draft national standard (3-6 month) • 5. Approval of the final draft by TC/SC (2 month) • 6. Editing and publishing (2 month) • Timeline for the process: 12-21 months. • Development of anR (Recommendation): 12-21 month as well 7

8. How to propose an STO GAZPROM • Major challenge to achieve consensus on subject matter. • Typically the process can be described as follows: • 1. Submitting of a proposal to the Perspective standards development plan • 2. Development of the first draft standard (3-6 month) • 3. Review of first draft and public discussion (1-2 month) • 4. Development of the final draft national standard (3-6 month) • 5. Approvaland registration of the final draft (1 month) • 6. Editing and publishing (1 month) • Timeline for the process: 9-16 months. • Development of anRGazprom(Recommendation): 9-12 month 8

9. How to propose and issue a DNV Guideline/RP • DNV Guidelines are published as “Recommended Practices”. • The stages of development are: • Propose new publication to DNV “Rules and Standards Secretariat” • Acceptance by DNV Rules and Standards Secretariat and relevant Service Line Director • Develop draft text for hearing • Submit draft for hearing to Rules Secretariate • Internal and external hearing • Comment review and approval by DNV Design Review Board • Publication. • Duration typically 3 months from finished draft document • “Fast track” publishing under special circumstances

10. How to propose and issue an OGP Report (Guideline, RP, etc.). • Typically one or more members of the OGP standing committees made up of OGP member representatives proposes document • The committee needs to agree for the need for this document and approve the start of the process, with a minimum of three members from different companies agreeing to draft the report. • This Responsible Committee arranges for the development, review within OGP membership and approval of the report in co-operation and agreement with OGP secretariat. • Normally, a minimum of four working weeks shall be allowed for the Responsible Committee’s review of the draft document. • For some documents (position papers) the OGP Management committee approval is required. • An OGP report can be developed and published in a very short time if need be as no outside bodies need to be consulted, but normally it may take 6-12 months.

11. Format of Deliverables • Format for deliverables to be structured and edited as far as reasonably practical in conformance with • ISO/IEC Directives, Part 2, “Rules for the structure and drafting of International Standards” • This applies irrespective of type document produced • This will assure • best possible harmonisation of language and formats with the numerous international standards referenced in the B2020 project

12. RN02: Ice Loads - Recommended Format Barents 2020 phase 4 deliverable • Document specifying an annex to ISO 19906 on Ice Loads • Document to be proposed to the Russian and Norwegian standards developing organisations (SDO) as a national annex (supplement) to the assumed Russian and Norwegian adoption of ISO 19906 (or EN ISO 19906) • Russia: National annex to GOST R ISO 19906 • Norway: National annex to NS-EN-ISO 19906 • Alternatively, document proposed for a harmonised new separate GOST R and NS standard • to leave the adoption of ISO 19906 as a clean document Following B2020 phase 4 (2012 - ) • Input to ISO 19906 amendment or revision process • Alternatively, a new ISO standard within the area of arctic operations

13. RN03: Risk Management - Recommended Format Objective • The working group’s focus is on information exchange during seminars, and not direct input to standardisation Barents 2020 phase 4 deliverable: • Seminar proceedings on Risk Management • Include seminar introduction/conclusions in the general phase 4 report • Produce conference/seminar proceedings as a separate report, also including extract from phase 3 conclusions for this group

14. RN04: Evacuation and Rescue - Recommended Format Barents 2020 phase 4 deliverable • Document specifying an annex to ISO 19906 on EER • Document to be proposed to the Russian and Norwegian standards developing organisations (SDO) as a national annex (supplement) to the assumed Russian and Norwegian adoption of ISO 19906 (or EN ISO 19906) • Russia: National annex to GOST R ISO 19906 • Norway: National annex to NS-EN-ISO 19906 • Alternatively, document proposed for a harmonised new separate GOST R and NS standard • to leave the adoption of ISO 19906 as a clean document • Functional specifications to be issued as Barents 2020 technical reports • Depending on the maturity of the outcome, they may be considered for issue as DNV RP. Following B2020 phase 4 (2012 - ) • Input to ISO 19906 amendment or revision process • Alternatively, a new ISO standard within the area of arctic operations

15. RN05: Human Factors - Recommended Format Barents 2020 phase 4 deliverable • Guideline on Human Factors in Barents Sea • Document to be proposed initially as: • Corporate standard of GAZPROM (STO) • DNV RP Following B2020 phase 4 (2012 - ) • Input to a new stand-alone ISO standard within this area

16. RN06: Ice Management - Recommended format Barents 2020 phase 4 deliverable • Guideline on Ice Management • Document to be proposed initially as: • Corporate standard of GAZPROM (STO) • DNV RP Following B2020 phase 4 (2012 - ) • Input to a new stand-alone ISO standard within this area

17. RN07:Operational Emissions and Discharges - Recommended format Barents 2020 phase 4 deliverable • Document specifying regional standard on Operational Emissions/ Discharges • Document to be proposed to the Russian and Norwegian standards developing organisations (SDO) as: • National Russian standard (GOST R and SanPin (Sanitary Rules and Norms)) • Norwegian Standard (NS) • (alternatively industry guideline)

18. Concluding Remarks • The recommendations given should not be regarded as definite final conclusions • Progress should be continually observed throughout the duration of B2020 phase 4 • Format of deliverable to be adjusted as necessary based on: • actual progress • quality of work • response from potential publication “owners”

19. Further work tasks for RN01

20. Further work tasks for RN01 • Review deliverables from working groups for compliance with the recommendations report of RN01, and prepare roadmaps for implementation of deliverables • Create awareness among the potential recipients (e.g. standards organisations) as to what is coming and acting as an intermediary as necessary and appropriate

21. Creating Awareness - ISO/TC67/SC7 Relations Most of the deliverables of Barents 2020 are related to ISO/TC67/SC7 standardization activities ISO 19906 which is the major standard for E&P in arctic regions was developed under responsibility of SC7 WG8 of SC7 finished its job with ISO 19906 and now is in a “stand-by” mode but could be reengaged to start working with Barents 2020 deliverables SC7 has lack of information about Barents 2020 activities There is an urgent need to inform SC7 about current project status and to aware them about future plans and deliverables including AHG “Arctic operation” activities Best way to do that is to make a presentation at closest SC7 plenary meeting in January 2011 Management of SC7 welcomes RN01 experts to attend the plenary meeting to establish close connections among ISO and Barents 2020 project 21

22. 2011 additional tasks for RN01 • Review deliverables from working groups for compliance with the recommendations report of RN01, and prepare roadmaps for implementation of deliverables • Create awareness among the potential recipients (e.g. standards organisations) as to what is coming and acting as an intermediary as necessary and appropriate • Provide proposal for an Arctic long term international standards program (ref. ISO/TC67 MC Ad-hoc group Arctic Operations) and including potentially missing international standards for the broader Arctic environment

23. ISO TC67 MC Ad-hoc Group “Arctic Operations” • Terms of references: • Provide a proposal for an Arctic (or cold conditions) operations long term international standards programme • Propose the way ISO/TC 67 should deal with such standards • Take input from the Barents 2020 project • Present a proposal at the ISO/TC67 plenary meeting in Moscow, September 2011

24. ISO TC67 MC Ad-hoc Group “Arctic Operations” Members: • Marat Mansurov, VNIIGAZ, chair • Alf Reidar Johansen, OGP, co-chair • Jan Inge Dalane, Statoil • Anatoly Baryshnikov, ENI • Muayad Ajjawi, Qatar Petroleum • UK (to be determined) • ++

25. RN01 work plan and deliverables • Proposal for an arctic long term international standards program: • Input from B2020 work groups by March 2011 • Present draft report at B2020 May meeting • Finished report by end June 2011 • Handover to ISO TC67 MC Ad-hoc Group

26. Summary

27. Safeguarding life, property and the environment www.dnv.com