1 / 41

Comparison of Statistical Methods for Delay Measurement between Heart Sound Signals

Comparison of Statistical Methods for Delay Measurement between Heart Sound Signals . פרוייקט סיום לתואר שני המחלקה להנדסה ביו-רפואית פברואר 2004 מציג: רן מוצ'ארי מנחה: פרופ' נתן אינטרטור. Outline. Arterial stiffness Heart & Carotid sounds Methods:

alec
Download Presentation

Comparison of Statistical Methods for Delay Measurement between Heart Sound Signals

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Comparison of Statistical Methodsfor Delay Measurement between Heart Sound Signals פרוייקט סיום לתואר שני המחלקה להנדסה ביו-רפואית פברואר 2004 מציג: רן מוצ'ארי מנחה: פרופ' נתן אינטרטור

  2. Outline • Arterial stiffness • Heart & Carotid sounds • Methods: • TF Estimation: Welch, Regression, Ridge Regression • Phase Delay • Cross Correlation with Predicted Signal • Results • Simulation, Healthy, Cardiac patients • Discussion & Conclusions

  3. Arterial Stiffness - Definition

  4. Arterial Stiffness - Control • Goal – distribute blood to active tissues by controlling smooth muscle constriction • Metabolic control – • Heart, brain, contracting skeleton muscles • Neural control (mostly sympathetic) - • Skin, resting skeletal muscles • Arterioles, muscular arteries, large arteries • Long term (tonic) and short term (phasic) • Other affecting factors (age, disease, BP)

  5. Arterial Stiffness - Evaluation • Goal – prognostic and therapeutic information beyond blood pressure measurements • Direct methods – • Change of arterial dimensions in response to pressure change (US echo-tracking, MRI) • Indirect methods – • Pulse contour analysis (Pulse wave, Finger IR) • Pulse wave velocity (Tonometry, QKd, MRI, Doppler US) • Pulse wave velocity – • Pulse pressure wave – low frequency signal • Time-delay between two places • Foot-to-toot, peak-to-peak, cross correlation

  6. Heart Sounds – Mechanical Correlations

  7. Heart Sounds – Auscultation Areas

  8. Heart sounds – PCG, ECG and CP

  9. Heart sounds – PCG, ECG and BP

  10. Onset of CaS1 coincides with onset of CP Onset of CaS2 coincides with CP dicrotic notch Carotid Artery Sounds (CAS) Taken from [Hasegawa,1991]

  11. S1 caS1 S2 CaS2 Carotid Sounds – PCG and CAS

  12. Methodology Welch, Regression or Ridge BPF phase slope TFE BPF TD filter Pred Env Peak CC Env Peak

  13. TFE – General FIR Model v(n) x(n) h + y(n)

  14. TFE Model - Welch • The periodogram: • Welch’s method for PSD estimation: • windowing and averaging • Welch’s transfer function estimator: • The Coherence function:

  15. TFE Model – Regression and Ridge • Multiple regression model (y: Carotid Signal, X: Heart Sound) • Multiple regression solution: • Ridge regression solution:

  16. Delay Estimation – Phase Data • Calculated between the S1/S2 complex at the heart and carotid • Time delay calculation – • method I: • Method II: Linear regression over phase data • Main difficulty – How to choose relevant frequencies for optimal Time Delay Estimation • Solution – frequency range of linear phase and high coherence values (30-90Hz, 30-120Hz)

  17. 30dB -15dB Method I Method II Simulation - Phase Data

  18. Spurious prediction by Welch TF Simulation – Prediction (–15dB)

  19. 30dB 0dB -15dB Simulation - GCC Envelope

  20. Healthy Subject – No Breathing

  21. Healthy Subject – Two Peaks

  22. Healthy Subject – S1 Removed

  23. Healthy Subject – One Peak

  24. Original Signal S1 Removed from Heart Healthy Subject – Phase & Coherence

  25. Healthy Subject - Breathing Noise

  26. Breathing Noise – GCC Before BPF After BPF

  27. Breathing Noise – Phase Before BPF After BPF

  28. Breathing Noise – Carotid Prediction Aligned with caS2

  29. Patient – Missing S1, Short S2 Delay Patient Recordings Were Provided by MediMon Inc.

  30. Patient – GCC Welch Regress No TFE Ridge

  31. Patient – Time Domain Filters Welch Regress Ridge

  32. Discussion & Conclusions • Time-delay estimation of propagating heart pulse pressure wave is useful for monitoring short-term changes of arterial stiffness. • Heart and carotid sounds may be used instead of pressure wave, as demonstrated by Hasegawa. • GCC (Generalized Cross Correlation) of heart sound signal and predicted carotid signal according to Welch TFE (GCC) is sensitive to multiple delays, breathing noise, frequency filters etc. • Linear regression of Welch’s TFE phase requires frequency selection, and is not reliable when coherence is low (patient #1). • GCC with Ridge Regression TFE is the most stable method.

  33. Future Directions • Check if propagation speed of heart sounds reflects arterial stiffness. • Validate results on larger population • Simulate of real events • Combine with pre-segmentation of S1 & S2 • Check adaptive methods • Synchronized averaging of Welch’s TFE

  34. Patient – Welch Prediction

  35. Patient – Ridge Prediction

  36. Patient – Regression Prediction

  37. Patient #1 – Low Coherence

  38. Patient #1 – Ridge More Stable

  39. Patient #1 – Opposite time delays

  40. Time Domain Filter Envelope (0dB) Welch Regress Ridge

  41. Time Domain Filter Envelope (–15dB) Welch Regress Ridge

More Related