slide1
Download
Skip this Video
Download Presentation
Teacher Quality Workshops for 2010/2011

Loading in 2 Seconds...

play fullscreen
1 / 12

Teacher Quality Workshops for 2010/2011 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 111 Views
  • Uploaded on

Teacher Quality Workshops for 2010/2011. Group Norms. Be an active learner Be an attentive listener Be a reflective participant Be conscious of your needs and needs of others. Year-long Objectives.

loader
I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
capcha
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about ' Teacher Quality Workshops for 2010/2011 ' - alea-huff


An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
group norms
Group Norms
  • Be an active learner
  • Be an attentive listener
  • Be a reflective participant
  • Be conscious of your needs and needs of others
year long objectives
Year-long Objectives
  • Strengthen our mathematical knowledge for teaching to foster in our students conceptual understanding and mathematical thinking
  • Develop activities with high cognitive demand for students to engage
  • Orchestrate productive math discussion in our classrooms
  • Build a professional learning community
slide4

Mathematical Knowledge for Teaching

Subject Matter Knowledge

Pedagogical Content Knowledge

Knowledge of

Content and Students (KCS)

Common Content

Knowledge (CCK)

Specialized Content Knowledge (SCK)

Knowledge of curriculum

Knowledge at

the mathematical horizon

Knowledge of Content and

Teaching (KCT)

slide6

“There is no decision that teachers make that has a greater impact on students’ opportunities to learn, and on their perceptions about what mathematics is, than the selection or creation of the tasks with which the teacher engages students in studying mathematics.”

Lappanand Briars, 1995

… because …

“Not all tasks are created equal, and different tasks will provoke different levels and kinds of student thinking.”

Stein, Smith, Henningsen, & Silver, 2000

“The level and kind of thinking in which students engage determines what they will learn.”

Hiebert, Carpenter, Fennema, Fuson, Wearne, Murray, Oliver & Human, 1997

slide7

Four levels of cognitive demand

Memorization

Procedures without connections to concepts or meaning

e.g., remember a ratio is written as A : B or A/B.

e.g., use a scale-factor to find equivalent ratios

Procedures with connections to concepts or meaning

Doing mathematics

e.g., use diagrams to explain why the scale-factor method works

e.g., the watermelon problem

Stein, Smith, Henningsen, & Silver, 2000

slide8

Two Lower-Level Cognitive Demands

  • Involve either reproducing previously learned information (facts, rules, formulae, or definitions) OR committing them to memory
  • Involve exact reproduction of previously-seen material
  • Have no connection to the concepts or meaning that underlie the information being learned or reproduced
  • Memorization
  • 2. Procedures Without Connections
  • Are algorithmic (specifically called for OR based on prior work)
  • Has obvious indicator of what needs to be done or how to do it
  • Have no connection to the concepts or meaning that underlie the procedure being used
  • Are focused on producing correct answers rather than developing mathematical understanding
  • Requireonly “how” explanations, no “why” explanations
slide9

Two Higher-Level Cognitive Demands

  • To deepen student understanding of concepts and ideas
  • Suggest pathways that are broad general procedures that have close connections to underlying conceptual ideas
  • Can be represented in multiple ways
  • Cannot be followed mindlessly (require cognitive effort)

3. Procedures with connections to concepts or meaning

  • 4. Doing Mathematics
  • Require complex and non-algorithmic thinking (ie. non-routine)
  • Require students to access relevant knowledge/experiences
  • Require students to analyze tasks and examine task constraints
  • Require students to explore and understand relationships
  • Demand self-monitoring
  • Require considerable cognitive effort (may lead to frustration)
slide11

Let’s Compare These Two Tasks

What key understandings can be fostered in each task?

slide12

Comparing the Two Tasks

  • Which task involves a higher-level cognitive demand? Why?
  • Which task is more appropriate for your students?
  • Which task better prepares students for STAAR?
ad