Women’s Ways of Knowing. Mary Field Belenky Blythe McVicker Clinchy Nancy Rule Goldberger Jill Mattuck Tarule. 5 Epistemological Perspectives. Not stages Not fixed or universal Abstract The 5 Perspectives Silence Received Knowledge Subjective Knowledge Procedural Knowledge
Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.
Women’s Ways of Knowing
Mary Field Belenky
Blythe McVicker Clinchy
Nancy Rule Goldberger
Jill Mattuck Tarule
Belenky, M.F., Clinchy, B.M., Goldberger, N.R., & Tarule, J.M. (1986). Women’s ways of knowing. New York: Basic Books.
Gallos, J. V. (1995). Gender and silence: Implications of women's ways of knowing. College Teaching, 43(3), 101-105.
Love, P. G., & Guthrie, L. (1999). Women's ways of knowing. New Directions for Student Services, no. 88, 17-27.
Gose, B. (1995). "Women's Ways of Knowing" form the basis for Ursuline curriculum. Chronicle of Higher Education, 41(22) [No Pagination].
Handy, T. J. (1991). "Women's Ways of Knowing": Explanations and implications for gender differences in substance abuse. College Student Affairs Journal, 11(2), 16-24.