Dalit Levy,  Robert Tinker
This presentation is the property of its rightful owner.
Sponsored Links
1 / 16

Links between Dynamic Representations of Atomic-Scale Phenomena and Molecular Reasoning February 2008, CHAIS conference PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 86 Views
  • Uploaded on
  • Presentation posted in: General

Dalit Levy, Robert Tinker The Concord Consortium. Links between Dynamic Representations of Atomic-Scale Phenomena and Molecular Reasoning February 2008, CHAIS conference. The work is supported by the NSF under the TELS grant. Today’s Presentation Outline.

Download Presentation

Links between Dynamic Representations of Atomic-Scale Phenomena and Molecular Reasoning February 2008, CHAIS conference

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Presentation Transcript


Links between dynamic representations of atomic scale phenomena and molecular reasoning february 2008 chais confe

Dalit Levy, Robert Tinker

The Concord Consortium

Links between Dynamic Representations

of Atomic-Scale Phenomena

and Molecular Reasoning

February 2008, CHAIS conference

The work is supported by the NSF under the TELS grant.


Links between dynamic representations of atomic scale phenomena and molecular reasoning february 2008 chais confe

Today’s Presentation Outline

1. The need for a TELS project on Phase Change

2. The goals of the project

3. Researchgoals and questions

4. Participants and data

5. The need for a Molecular Reasoning scale

6. Results of analyzing the data using the MR scale


Links between dynamic representations of atomic scale phenomena and molecular reasoning february 2008 chais confe

1. Why did we design the

“Phases of Matter and Phase Change” Project?

  • Traditional instruction of phase change in high school chemistry classes might leave too many students with a little understanding of underlying concepts and processes.

  • For example, in TELS 2004 benchmark assessment:

  • only half of the students knew that when phase change occurs the temperature stays constant

  • 42% of the students didn’t know that the temperature is a measure of the average kinetic energy of the molecules

In spite of prior knowledge that students have after dealing (macroscopically) with states of matter in the elementary and the middle school, many of them lack the ability to integrate the molecular (microscopic) aspect they are exposed to in their high school chemistry lessons into an elaborated conceptual account of processes of phase change (Smith, Reiser, Anderson, & Krajcik, 2006).


Links between dynamic representations of atomic scale phenomena and molecular reasoning february 2008 chais confe

2-a. The goals of the

“Phases of Matter and Phase Change” Project

Goal 1 - Knowledge Integration (KI)

Develop the learners’ ability to integrate knowledge

about macroscopic and molecular properties of the

three phases of matter

Goal 2 - Molecular Reasoning (MR)

Enable the creation of higher level explanations of

phase change related phenomena

Instructional Technology


Links between dynamic representations of atomic scale phenomena and molecular reasoning february 2008 chais confe

The Phase Change project

2-b. Static vs. Dynamic visualizations

Static Molecular Models

(From Pearson Prentice Hall Chemistry, 2005)

Static models only partially represent atomic-scale properties. The static representation is just one specific frame of the ever-changing dynamic molecular world.In spite of prior

Students have difficulties understanding that atoms are in constant motion in solid, liquid and gas (Pallant & Tinker, 2004).


Links between dynamic representations of atomic scale phenomena and molecular reasoning february 2008 chais confe

The Phase Change project

2-c. Static vs. Dynamic visualizations

Dynamic Molecular Models

The TELS model of solid The TELS model of liquid The TELS model of Gas

Molecular Workbench models use a computing engine that lets users observe and interact directly with a sophisticated representation of the molecular world.

In TELS, these dynamic models are embedded within an inquiry activity that enables the recording of predictions before, and reflections after, the interaction with the models.


Links between dynamic representations of atomic scale phenomena and molecular reasoning february 2008 chais confe

3. Research Goals and Questions

Research Goals

  • Examine the level of molecular reasoning

  • in students explanationsof phase change phenomena

  • Trace the changes in students’ level of molecular reasoning

  • and their level of knowledge integration

Research Quaestion

What are the changes in the students ability to use

Molecular Reasoning (MR) in their explanations of

phase change phenomena?


Links between dynamic representations of atomic scale phenomena and molecular reasoning february 2008 chais confe

4-a. Participants and Data

Participants

  • 5 TELS high schools in MA, NC, WI

  • 8 teachers (7 chemistry, 1 biology)

  • 313 pairs of students, grades 9-12

  • (diverse background)

Examples of post-test responses

Student #5: “hot water. EXPLANATION: when adding heat the molecules tend to break down faster”.

Student #18: “hot water. EXPLANATION: The hot water will break the intermolecular forces faster than the cold water will. Which will make the molecules have a less restricted range of motion”.

Data Sources

Students’ answers to four pre- and post- test items, designed to

assess the learners ability to employ a molecular point of view

while explaining a familiar phenomenon.

Overall, more than 2000 answers were examined.

Sample assessment item

If you want something to dissolve fast, you should mix it with:

Hot water. (b) Cold water.

Explain why, referring to molecular motion.

Examples of pre-test responses

Student #10: “hot water. EXPLANATION: Sugar dissolves faster in a cup of hot milk than in a cup of cold milk.”

Student #18: “hot water. EXPLANATION: the molecules move faster”.


Links between dynamic representations of atomic scale phenomena and molecular reasoning february 2008 chais confe

4-b. Participants and Data

Example - item 7 in the pre/post test:

What happens towater molecules when a cube of ice is taken

out of the freezer and left at room temperature?

173 pre: “The molecules are heated up, and begin to

move faster and the ice will melt because of the

increased speed of the water molecules”

173 post: “The water molecules begin to move faster,

and break apart more, therefore a smaller intermolecular

force, and it causes the ice to melt, and become water

again.”

31 pre: “The cube of ice will melt. The warm molecules

in the air go to the ice and slowly mix with the cold

molecules making the ice cube melt”.


Links between dynamic representations of atomic scale phenomena and molecular reasoning february 2008 chais confe

5-a. The Molecular Reasoning Scoring Rubric

Student responses were coded using a new rubric, titled the Molecular Reasoning scale

Historical Reference

Pauling (1944 Nobel prize winner) “worked from crystallographic data, and his bonds were static, stable, and enduring”.

Zewail (1999 Nobel prize winner) “has set those bonds in motion, making them as alive and dynamic as chemistry itself” (Smith,1999)


Links between dynamic representations of atomic scale phenomena and molecular reasoning february 2008 chais confe

5-b. A scale for measuring Molecular Reasoning (MR)

Some MR scoring issues

Keywords

98 pre: In a solid the intermolecular bonds are close, in a liquid

the intermolecular bonds are spread apart but don't move that fast.

In a gas the intermolecular are spread far apart and mover slow.

Dynamic image, scored 2.

3

Bond +

176 pre:gas bonds are weak since the atoms are more

spread out then liquid, and liquid is a weaker bond then a solid

because solids are close together and used all together

Static image, but speaks of bonds - scored 2.

2

Speeding

167 pre: The arrangenment of the balls determines

the phase of the matter, a tight arrangenment would

Indicate a solid matter.

Static image, scored 1.

1

Expand


Links between dynamic representations of atomic scale phenomena and molecular reasoning february 2008 chais confe

6-a. Results

Improved ability of Molecular Reasoning (MR)

The MR score improved from pre- to post for 76% of the students.

No gain

Negative gain

Positive gain

The positive gain group started the learning with an average MR score below the static MR level and finished closer to a dynamic MR level. The other two groups were already above the static level in the pre-test.


Links between dynamic representations of atomic scale phenomena and molecular reasoning february 2008 chais confe

6-b. Results

Significant change from pre to post

Within the positive gain group, the average MR level improved from 0.91 (pre) to 1.67 (post). The pairs of students in this group (76% of the pairs) clearly climbed above the static level of molecular reasoning, employing a more dynamic point of view after learning with the TELS project.

All Positive No gain Negative

gain gain


Links between dynamic representations of atomic scale phenomena and molecular reasoning february 2008 chais confe

6-c. Results

Distributions of MR scoresin the positive gain group

Only 3 pairs showed a dynamic MR in the pre-test, and no pair expressed the highest intermolecular level. Students start the TELS Phase Change project with a little prior knowledge about molecular dynamic, and without any knowledge about intermolecular forces.

0 .25 .50 .75 1 1.25 1.5 1.75 2

0 .25 .50 .75 1 1.25 1.5 1.75 2 2.25 2.5 2.75 3

In the post-test, 18% scored 2 or higher, presenting the highest level of understanding.


Links between dynamic representations of atomic scale phenomena and molecular reasoning february 2008 chais confe

6-d. Results

Qualitative Results

Pre-test responses tend to be a mix:

“the molecules melt” (mixing macroscopic and molecular aspects)

“the bonds separate” (mixing molecules and bonds).

2. Pre-test responses show a clear lack of knowledge about intermolecular

forces. When using the term, it is often very wrong.

3. When is a certain phase of matter stronger than the other?

Six categories were found:

Harder to break is stronger;Stable is stronger;

Heavier is stronger; Harder to separate is stronger.

Denser is stronger;Faster is stronger;

The 3 left categories reflect non-MR; the 3 right categories reflect MR.


Links between dynamic representations of atomic scale phenomena and molecular reasoning february 2008 chais confe

Thanks for listening!

 1. The need for a TELS project on Phase Change

 2. The goals of the project

 3. Research goals and questions

 4. Participants and data

 5. The need for a Molecular Reasoning scale

6. Results of analyzing the data using the MR scale


  • Login