Corruption in croatia a short guide for visitors
This presentation is the property of its rightful owner.
Sponsored Links
1 / 43

Corruption in Croatia: A Short Guide for Visitors PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 69 Views
  • Uploaded on
  • Presentation posted in: General

Corruption in Croatia: A Short Guide for Visitors. Zagreb 19.Sept.2006. When?. Corruption: The six phases 1990–1995 War and Corruption 1995-1999 Cohabitation with Corruption 2000–2003 The Time of Compromise 2003-2006 The return to issue 2006-- War against corruption  200.

Download Presentation

Corruption in Croatia: A Short Guide for Visitors

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Presentation Transcript


Corruption in croatia a short guide for visitors

Corruption in Croatia: A Short Guide for Visitors

Zagreb 19.Sept.2006


Corruption in croatia a short guide for visitors

When?

Corruption: The six phases

  • 1990–1995 War and Corruption

  • 1995-1999 Cohabitation with Corruption

  • 2000–2003 The Time of Compromise

  • 2003-2006 The return to issue

  • 2006-- War against corruption

  • 200....


How much corruption

How much corruption?

  • CPI index

  • Corruption barometar

  • Public opinion

  • Public Scandals

  • Economic indicators


Position on the list

Position on the list


Results

Results


Results1

Results -


Corruption in croatia beyond the facts

Corruption in Croatia: Beyond the facts

  • CPI contribute to a knowledge map on which policy action can be taken.

    • No single index contains the concept in its entirety.

  • To provide a cardinal or ordinal index as a basis for comparison.

  • Common units does not imply comparability of meaning.


Beeps world bank

BEEPS World Bank


Slight improvement

Slight improvement

Slight improvement


Maeasure of sc

Maeasure of SC


Nations in transit 2006 croatia corruption

Nations in Transit 2006Croatia:Corruption


Gfk septembar 2006

GfK Septembar 2006


Corrupt state

Corrupt State


Corruption in croatia a short guide for visitors

We live in a corrupt state.

„positiveanswers“

CEE AVERAGE: 69%

%


Against corruption

Against Corruption


Nations in transit

Nations in Transit

Numerous surveys highlight the public perception that corruption has actually gotten worse over

the past year. According to the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development's 2005

Transition Report: "Croatia was among the few transition countries (Hungary, Azerbaijan,

Armenia) in which corruption in 2005 was higher than in 2002."

Transparency International indicates in its Corruption Perceptions Index for 2005 that Croatia has

dropped three places from the previous year, which places it in the company of Burkina Faso,

Egypt, and Syria.

Citizens feel that corruption is especially widespread among political parties, in the judiciary, and in representative bodies. On a scale of 1 to 5, with 5 representing total corruption, political parties scored a grade of 4, followed closely by representative bodies with 3.9 and the judiciary with 3.8.

Citizens evaluated NGOs, the military, and the church as being the least corrupt.

Hospitals were among the institutions with the worst reputations. Agence France-Presse reports that 90 percent of Croatians feel that bribing doctors is not out of the ordinary.bribery, nepotism, and political patronage are a legacy of the former regime and the nation’s past.Numerous surveys also highlight that corruption is perceived to be widespread in land registration.


3 anti corruption policy

Preliminary findings

Dimension specific results

3. Anti-Corruption Policy

  • Croatia has made solid progress in signing and ratifying key international conventions and has aligned key components of criminal legislation to international standards.

  • Conflict of interest policy has improved (e.g. wealth declaration of public managers) but still inconsistencies in the legislation and the institutional basis for resolution of conflicts must be strengthened.

  • Although public procurement is largely in line with the acquis communautaire, rules and procedures for fair and transparent procurement are not always respected according to the private sector.

  • Croatia needs to develop a clear plan to tackle corruption with customs officials. Training of customs officials is still largely insufficient.

  • Public/private consultation, monitoring and evaluation and public awareness campaigns should become more extensive if the national strategy is followed.


Anti corruption policy

Preliminary findings

Dimension specific results

Anti-Corruption Policy


3 anti corruption policy good governance

Preliminary findings

Dimension specific results

3. Anti-Corruption Policy: Good governance


National strategy

National Strategy

  • Second Strategy

  • Political Will

  • Operationalization

  • Credible leadership

  • Entry point

  • Diagnosis

  • Assessment of the political culture

  • Sequencing


National program

National Program

The first challenge that all transition countries face in launching an anticorruption strategy is credible leadership. A serious anticorruption program cannot be imposed from the outside, but requires committed leadership from within, ideally from the highest levels of the state. Yet it is precisely the credibility of the state that is undermined by pervasive corruption, creating a potential vicious circle in which entry points for an anticorruption strategy are hard to find. Building a demand for reform amongst the general public through diagnostic survey work can be an effective way of convincing the political leadership that serious anticorruption efforts will win them popular support.


Research tools

Research Tools

The third challenge is to develop a detailed diagnosis of the nature and extent of corruption in the particular country. Experience has already shown that domestic surveys of households, firms, and public officials can be a powerful tool in any anticorruption strategy. The purpose of such an exercise is to gain essential information about the nature of the corruption beyond the general categories analyzed in this report and to identify possible entry points (see below) into effective anticorruption work. The process of implementing surveys, running workshops, and developing a dialogue within civil society on the nature of the problem can play a major role in galvanizing support for an anticorruption strategy and building constituencies at various levels of the system.


Who actors in corruption

Who: Actors in Corruption

  • Political parties

  • Health

  • Judiciary

  • Local Government


Money and politics

Money and Politics

  • “There are two things important in politics. The first is money

  • and I can’t remember what the second one is”.

  • Mark Hanna,1904


Learning or tricks lerning tricks

The party finance reform and regulation of electoral campaigns, beside the manifest goals have effects in development of participative political culture. It is a learning and constructive process and not a set of tricks to make politics a vocation for the honest people

Learning or tricks/lerning tricks


The changing nature of political campaignes

Increase of costs

Professionalism

Public relations

Electronic media

Trading of influence

Lobbyng costs

Oligarhisation

The changing nature of political campaignes


Inside the parties soft money

Inside the parties: soft money

  • Oligarhization and concentration of power and knowledge on finances

  • Records and secrecy, books and soft money, audit

  • Connections and influence of donors (“no free lunch”)


Croatian legislation

Law on Political Parties (LPP: Zakon o političkim strankama OG 164/98, 111/96, 76/93)

Law on Elections in Sabor (LES: Zakon o izborima zastupnika u Hrvatski drzavni Sabor,OG 116/99)

Law on Presidential Elections (LPE: Zakon o izboru predsjednika Republike Hrvatske ,OG 22/92).

Law on financing of Campaign for Election of the President (Zakon o financiranju izborne promidžbe za izbor predsjednika RH OG 22/94). 21.July 2004

Croatian legislation


Elements of the party system croatia

Elements Of The Party System: Croatia

  • Non for profit entities

  • Financed by membership fee and state budget (0,056%)

  • 20% equally + 80% mandates

  • etc.


Croatia campaign finance

Croatia -Campaign Finance

  • The right for compensation of costs from budget if the have representative elected

  • Limit of 5% of votes

  • Obligation to disclose the estimation of costs

  • Minorities


Article 20 1

Article 20.1.

  • PP are “obliged to publicly disclose source and assignments of their financial funds in calendar interval”

  • If not “ the amount of money from budget will be designated to humanitarian actions”


Law on financing of campaign for election of the president 2004

Disclosure regulations ?.

Bans against certain types of contribution?.

Local budgets, state owned companies, business corporations, trade unions or foreign organisations and foreign citizens.

Law on financing of Campaign for Election of the President¸2004


Money lies at the root of several political evils

Money lies at the root of several political evils:

(1) Corruption. Politicians and parties may be tempted to give improper favours in return for political contributions. The search for founds has often led to corruption.

(2) Unfairness. Money may lead to unfairness and may distort electoral competition.

(3) Financial barriers against standing for political office. The health of democracy demands that members of every group – rich or poor - should be able to undertake a career in politics.


T ypes of regulations

Types of Regulations

Contribution limits. Restrictions on the amounts an individual is permitted to donate.

Disclosure regulations. Mandatory declaration of the names of contributors to campaigns and to parties and disclosure of the amounts contributed by each.

Bans against certain types of contribution. For example, the regulation or restriction of political payments by business corporations, trade unions or foreign organisations and foreign citizens.

Public subsidies: Financial payments to parties or candidates from public funds.


Rational balance of financing public and private

Fair criteria for distribution

Strict rules and limits of private donations

Limits to overall costs of campaigns

Full transparency of accounts

Independent auditing body

Sanctions

Rational balance of financing (public and private)


Why are political financing regulations often evaded

Why are Political Financing Regulations Often Evaded ?

 (1) Loopholes. Although contributions to political parties and to election campaigns are two of the most important and most direct channels through which money may be use to influence politics, they are not the only ones. Restrictions on the financing of parties and elections are likely to prove ineffective if other forms of 'politically relevant' financing remain unchecked.

(2) Inadequate enforcement. In a field as controversial and complex as the funding of parties and campaigns, laws require effective supervision and implementation. Election law has been a burgeoning field of activity - and of profit - for the legal profession.


Emphasis and highlights

Emphasis and Highlights

  • Financing of political parties is priority in anti corruption

  • Standards and principles of regulation are developed, in spite of loopholes and abuses

  • Respect for local circumstances

    • The Role of Civil Society

  • Internal organizational issues of political parties


  • Health

    Health


    Corruption in judiciary

    Corruption in Judiciary

    Korupcija (WB)


    Corruption barometar

    Corruption Barometar

    • More then 70% Bolivia, Brazil, Peru

    • 51% - 70% Argentina, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Bulgaria, Cameroon, Costa Rica,Ecuador, France, Greece, Israel, Italy, South Korea, Latvia, Lithuania,Nigeria, Philippines, Poland, Romania, Taiwan, Turkey, Ukraine,Uruguay, Mexico

    • 31% - 50% Albania, Canada, Croatia, Czech Republic, Georgia, Germany, Ghana,India, Indonesia, Ireland, Kenya, Macedonia, Mexico, Moldova,Pakistan, Portugal, Russia, South Africa, Spain, USA

    • 11% - 30% Afghanistan, Austria, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, Guatemala, HongKong, Japan, Iceland, Kosovo, Luxembourg, Malaysia, Norway,Singapore, Switzerland, UK, Venezuela

    • Less 10% Netherlands


    Local government

    Local Government


    Corruption in croatia a short guide for visitors

    Un presidente de Mexicoentro cantando la letra de la anti-corrupcion y salio con las maletas llenascantando la misma cancionA president of mexico/began singing the verse of anti-corruption and left with full suitcases/singing the same song.

    Corruption in Croatia, especially at high levels of government, is endemic¸and systemic. Officials typically excuse Croatia with the empty phrase “corruption is a problem in all transition countries”. The too frail international strategy emphasises “process” and “capacity building” – the passing of laws and the training of officials to, as one official says, “reduce the opportunities for corruption”. It is both naïve and negligent to rely on weak indigenous watchdogs like the USKOK, the Anti-Corruption Council, or the media and civil society, to stand up alone to the corrupt elite.

    A dramatically different mind-set is needed. Croatia is not “just another transition country” but an inherently weak state with external and internal challenges to its very existence.


  • Login