the index of multiple deprivation imd 2004 quality of life indicators in rugby
Download
Skip this Video
Download Presentation
The Index of Multiple Deprivation (IMD) 2004 & Quality of Life Indicators in Rugby

Loading in 2 Seconds...

play fullscreen
1 / 28

The Index of Multiple - PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 392 Views
  • Uploaded on

The Index of Multiple Deprivation (IMD) 2004 & Quality of Life Indicators in Rugby Paul Seamer The Research Unit Warwickshire County Council Rugby Forward Co-ordinating Group 29 June 2005 Town Hall, Rugby IMD 2004 – National, County & Rugby specific context

loader
I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
capcha
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about 'The Index of Multiple ' - albert


An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
the index of multiple deprivation imd 2004 quality of life indicators in rugby

The Index of Multiple Deprivation (IMD) 2004 & Quality of Life Indicators in Rugby

Paul Seamer

The Research UnitWarwickshire County Council

Rugby Forward Co-ordinating Group29 June 2005Town Hall, Rugby

slide2

IMD 2004 – National, County & Rugby specific context

  • Quality of Life – Key indicators in Rugby Borough
imd 2004
IMD 2004
  • The IMD 2004 is a Super Output Area (SOA) level measure of multiple deprivation
  • Wow! – Sounds impressive, BUT what does that actually mean?
slide4
Multiple Deprivation
  • Distinct dimensions of deprivation and disadvantage which can be idenitified and measured separately (Domains)
  • People may be counted in one or more Domains depending on the number of types of deprivation they experience
slide5
IMD 2004 consists of seven distinct domains (and a number of sub-domains)
  • Each domain is built from a number of unpublished indicators (e.g. adults and children in Income Support households)
slide6
The seven domains are:
  • Income Deprivation (with sub-domains income deprivation affecting children and older persons)
  • Employment Deprivation
  • Health Deprivation & Disability
  • Education, Skills & Training Deprivation
  • Barriers to Housing & Services
  • Crime & Disorder
  • Living Environment
super output areas
Super Output Areas
  • Super Output Areas (SOAs) are replacing electoral wards as the primary means of dissemination of small area Government (and other) statistics.
  • Built from postcode based Census Output Areas
  • Three types of SOA – lower, middle and upper layer
slide8
IMD 2004 is at the lower layer: smaller than an electoral ward – c.1000-2000 people.
  • There are 32,482 SOAs (lower layer) in England; 333 in Warwickshire (cp. 105 wards)
slide10
Due to different domains, indicators and the new SOA geography forget any comparison with IMD 2000
  • A full report on IMD 2004 for Warwickshire is available at:www.warwickshire.gov.uk/deprivation
key findings overall imd 2004
Key Findings – Overall IMD 2004
  • 37 Warwickshire SOAs in total feature in most deprived 30% nationally
  • There are 2 Warwickshire SOAs within the most 10% deprived in England – within Bar Pool and Camp Hill wards.
  • A further 15 Warwickshire SOAs feature in most deprived 20% and a further 20 in the most deprived 30% of SOAs in England
slide12
26 of the 37 Warwickshire SOAs within the most deprived 30% nationally are in Nuneaton and Bedworth.
  • 5 are within Warwick, 4 within Rugby and 2 within North Warwickshire.
  • The 4 Rugby SOAs are within Brownsover South (worst 20%), Newbold (town centre), northern Overslade & Newbold-on-Avon.
slide15
National comparisons are clearly useful but additional analysis in a local context is also possible (e.g. Rugby rankings 1 – 58)…
  • …and by individual domains (types of deprivation)
slide20

Health Deprivation & Disability – Rugby ContextIdentifies areas with relatively high rates of people who die prematurely or whose quality of life is impaired by poor health or who are disabled, across the whole population.

slide21

Similar patterns emerge when looking at the different domains

  • SOA’s enable local level focus, but district level data is also of use, to gain a high level overview.
  • Quality of Life provides us with district level data
slide22

Quality of Life 2004

  • QoL is comprised from a number of Economic, Social and Environmental and Natural Resource indicators.
  • Rugby borough is most closest aligned to the Warwickshire average on a number of indicators.
  • Progress in Education & Health over the last 12 months
  • Many other indicators remain unchanged.
slide23

Indicator

Satisfaction with Health Services

Trend over time

˜

Compared with national average

. .

Compared

with Warwickshire average

q

Years of Life Lost

p

p

˜

Life Expectancy

p

p

˜

Mortality Rates

p

˜

˜

Smoking Cessation

. .

. .

. .

Key

p Good performance

˜ Moderate performance

q Poor performance

. . Information not available or not applicable at District level

Health

slide24

Pre-school Provision

Indicator

p

Trend over time

. .

Compared with national average

Compared

with Warwickshire average

˜

Key Stage 2/3 Attainment

p

p

˜

GCSE Attainment

˜

˜

˜

School Leaver Destinations

. .

. .

˜

Key

p Good performance

˜ Moderate performance

q Poor performance

. . Information not available or not applicable at District level

Education

p

p

p

Unauthorised Absence from School

slide25

Fear of Crime

Indicator

q

Trend over time

Compared with national average

. .

q

Compared

with Warwickshire average

Recorded Crime

˜

p

q

Disorder Incidents

˜

. .

q

Substance Misuse

˜

. .

q

Youth Offending

˜

. .

q

Key

p Good performance

˜ Moderate performance

q Poor performance

. . Information not available or not applicable at District level

Crime & Disorder

slide26

Bus Service Satisfaction

Indicator

Trend over time

q

. .

Compared with national average

p

Compared

with Warwickshire average

Travel to School

q

q

˜

Travel to Work

q

p

p

Traffic Volumes & Congestion

q

. .

q

Road Casualties

p

. .

˜

Cycling

q

p

p

Key

p Good performance

˜ Moderate performance

q Poor performance

. . Information not available or not applicable at District level

Travel

slide27

www.warwickshire.gov.uk/researchIMD 2004www.warwickshire.gov.uk/deprivationQuality of Life in Warwickshirewww.warwickshire.gov.uk/qualityoflife

slide28

Further Information

"www.warwickshire.gov.uk/research

ad