The Planets of Other Stars The Astronomy Diagnostic Test (ADT): The Sequel On the first day of class, the University requested that everyone fill out an online questionnaire through Angel . Now they want you to do it again.
Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.
The Planets of Other Stars
On the first day of class, the University requested that everyone fill out an online questionnaire through Angel. Now they want you to do it again.
As before, the survey won’t be graded, but participation will count towards your homework grade. Just answer the questions the best you can. (Taking the test may even help you study for the final!)
The test is 30 minutes long, and the link will disappear after Thursday.
For 50 years, astronomers have been looking for planets around other stars. Since planets are at least 100,000,000 times fainter than stars (because all they do is reflect a bit of the star’s light), direct detection is not (yet) possible. But planets can be found in 5 different ways:
Because our Sun (and other stars) are moving through space, the positions of stars on the sky change ever so slightly each year. This is called proper motion.
If a star’s proper motion wobbles with time, it could be due to an unseen companion. Only Jupiter-mass planets have enough mass to be detected in this way.
The greater the mass of the unseen companion, or the closer the separation, the greater the wobble. Detecting binary stars in this way is tedious, but do-able. Detecting planets astrometrically is extremely difficult.
If one were to observe the Sun from 10 pc away, its wobble (due principally to Jupiter and Saturn) would be less than 0.002 over 30 years. (Recall that the atmosphere blurs things out by 1, and, with our best measurements, we can measure parallaxes to 0.003)
Planets can be detected via measurements of the Doppler effect. The planet won’t be detected, but the reflex motion of the star might. (Thus, the star is like a single-line spectroscopic binary, with an extremely low-mass companion.)
The Sun’s reflex motion due to Jupiter is about 13 meters/sec. For reference, the absorbing gas in the Sun’s atmosphere moves about 13 km/sec, due to thermal effects alone.
Only Jupiter-mass planets can be detected in this way.
If a planet moves in front of its star, the light from the star will decreases very slightly, (less than 1%), depending on the size of the planet. Only Jupiter-sized planets are big enough to be detected.
Jupiter transit (artist conception)
If a star system contains a very accurate clock, you can tell when the star is closer to you (or further away) by timing when the clock’s signal arrives. (In practice, the only objects that this can be applied to is millisecond pulsars.)
The faster the pulsar, the more accurate the timing. In theory, objects as small as Mercury could be detected around a millisecond pulsar by the gravitational force it exerts on its parent star.
If a star/planet moves exactly in front of a background star, the brightness of the background star can be greatly magnified by the gravitational lens effect.
In principle, the gravitational lens technique can detect planets of any mass. However, once the event is over, the planet is lost forever (since we are only seeing the background source). It is impossible to learn anything more about the system.
Orbiting the 6.2 millisec pulsar are (at least) 4 small planets, with masses of 0.02, 4.3, 3.9, and 0.0004 M. These objects were mostly likely formed after the supernova, and after the pulsar evaporated its companion star. The orbits of planets B and C are in a 3:2 resonance.
51 Pegasi is a G5 main sequence star 15 pc from the Sun, whose Doppler motion changes by 53 meters/sec over a period of 4.2 days. The data imply the presence of a planet with
Some of the planets’ orbits are significantly elliptical!
Every 3.523 days, the G0 main sequence star HD 209428 dims by about 1.7%. This indicates that the planet is 60% larger than Jupiter.
The star’s Doppler measurements imply a mass of 0.63 MJup.
The density of the planet (0.27) is much less than water. The planet must be a gas giant that is “puffed up” by the heat from the star.
The modeling of the gravitational lens event implies the existence of a planet in orbit about a 0.36 M lensing star. The planet has a mass of about 1.5 MJup and a distance of about 3 A.U. from its star.
Reflex motion techniques work best when the planet is large and close to its star. Thus the data we have are biased. However, it is clear that many stars have Jupiter-mass planets in their inner solar system.
The data also show that the more metals in a star, the more likely the star is to planets around it. This suggests that planets cannot form out of hydrogen and helium alone -- even gas giants need a solid core around which to form.
1/3 1/2 1 1.8 3
Metallicity (compared to Sun)
As of December 8, 2008, 267 planets are known outside our solar system around 228 stars (not counting four gravitational lens events).
Many stars have hot Jupiters, and not all are in roughly circular orbits. But according to the solar nebula hypothesis, Jupiter-type planets cannot form close to a star, due to the star’s radiation pressure and stellar wind. How can this be?
Best Model: the hot Jupiters must have formed in the outer regions of their star systems, and then spiraled in due to friction in the protostellar disk. (But if they spiral in too much, they collide with the star.)
If this is the case, then smaller terrestrial planets in the inner part of the disk were destroyed when the Jupiter-mass planet passed by.