1 / 42

Selective Open Recursion Modular Reasoning about Components and Inheritance

Selective Open Recursion Modular Reasoning about Components and Inheritance. Jonathan Aldrich Carnegie Mellon University Kevin Donnelly Boston University. Outline. The Fragile Base Class Problem Selective Open Recursion Implementation & Analysis

alarice
Download Presentation

Selective Open Recursion Modular Reasoning about Components and Inheritance

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Selective Open RecursionModular Reasoning aboutComponents and Inheritance Jonathan Aldrich Carnegie Mellon University Kevin Donnelly Boston University

  2. Outline • The Fragile Base Class Problem • Selective Open Recursion • Implementation & Analysis • Discussion

  3. Inheritance and Information Hiding • Parnas’ advice: • Modularize a system to hide information that may change

  4. Inheritance and Information Hiding • Parnas’ advice: • Modularize a system to hide information that may change • Research question • How to hide information in component-based systems with inheritance?

  5. A Challenge: Open Recursion • Recursion • Objects can make self-calls to their own methods

  6. A Challenge: Open Recursion • Recursion • Objects can make self-calls to their own methods • Open Recursion • Self-calls are dynamically dispatched • I.e., target of call is “open” and can be overridden • Beneficial in “template method” design patterns

  7. class Window { void draw() { // draw background this.drawForeground(); } void drawForeground() { … } } class MyWindow { void draw() { super.draw(); } void drawForeground() { super.drawForeground(); ... } ... } Open Recursion Window draw drawFore

  8. class Window { void draw() { // draw background this.drawForeground(); } void drawForeground() { … } } class MyWindow { void draw() { super.draw(); } void drawForeground() { super.drawForeground(); ... } ... } Open Recursion Window draw drawFore Window MyWindow draw draw drawFore drawFore

  9. Hook Methods • Hook methods • Called by this when some event occurs • Intended as extension point for subclasses • Open recursion is necessary

  10. Hook Methods • Hook methods • Called by this when some event occurs • Intended as extension point for subclasses • Open recursion is necessary • Other methods • Perform some task • May be overridden, but has no “event” semantics • Open recursion unnecessary • At best, minor convenience • Has potential to cause the Fragile Base Class Problem

  11. class CountingSet extends Set { private int count; void add(Object elem) { super.add(elem); count++; } void addAll(Collection c){ super.addAll(c); count+=c.size(); } int size() { return count; } // other functions } The Fragile Base Class Problem Set CountingSet addAll addAll add add

  12. class CountingSet extends Set { private int count; void add(Object elem) { super.add(elem); count++; } void addAll(Collection c){ super.addAll(c); count+=c.size(); } int size() { return count; } // other functions } The Fragile Base Class Problem Set CountingSet addAll addAll add add Implicit assumption: Set.addAll does not call Set.add If this assumption is violated (or changed), CountingSet breaks

  13. The Fragile Base Class Problem • Definition (for this instance of FBC) • A class may depend on the calling patterns of a superclass, and break if these are changed

  14. Two Solutions to the FBC • Document open recursion [Kiczales & Lamping, Steyaert et al., Ruby & Leavens] • Exposes information, rather than hiding it • Prohibits natural changes to superclass Use forwarding to avoid open recursion [Bloch,Szyperski] Gives up benefits of open recursion Can we get the benefits of open recursion without the reasoning costs?

  15. Two Solutions to the FBC • Document open recursion [Kiczales & Lamping, Steyaert et al., Ruby & Leavens] • Exposes information, rather than hiding it • Prohibits natural changes to superclass • Use forwarding to avoid open recursion [Bloch,Szyperski] • Gives up benefits of open recursion Can we get the benefits of open recursion without the reasoning costs?

  16. Two Solutions to the FBC • Document open recursion [Kiczales & Lamping, Steyaert et al., Ruby & Leavens] • Exposes information, rather than hiding it • Prohibits natural changes to superclass • Use forwarding to avoid open recursion [Bloch,Szyperski] • Gives up benefits of open recursion • Can we get the benefits of open recursion without the reasoning costs?

  17. Outline • The Fragile Base Class Problem • Selective Open Recursion • Implementation & Analysis • Discussion

  18. Selective Open Recursion Use open recursion only where necessary • Hook methods • Use open modifier on method • Expresses “hook method” intent • All calls to open methods dispatched dynamically • Just as in Java today

  19. Selective Open Recursion Use open recursion only where necessary • Hook methods • Use open modifier on method • Expresses “hook method” intent • All calls to open methods dispatched dynamically • Just as in Java today • Other methods • Calls to non-open methods on this dispatched statically • The only change vs. Java • Hides internal calling patterns from subclasses • Other calls dispatched dynamically • open≠ virtual

  20. class Set { void add(Object o) { // adds an element } void addAll(Collection c){ foreach (Object o in c) this.add(o); } } add is not open, so subclass cannot intercept and depend on the call. Set can change without affecting subclasses. Selective Open Recursion Examples

  21. class Set { void add(Object o) { // adds an element } void addAll(Collection c){ foreach (Object o in c) this.add(o); } } add is not open, so subclass cannot intercept and depend on the call. Set can change without affecting subclasses. class Set { // invoked for each add op. open void add(Object o) { // adds an element } void addAll(Collection c){ foreach (Object o in c) this.add(o); } } add is open, indicating the developer’s intent to expose this method as a semantic event to subclasses. Any changes to class Set must preserve these semantics. Selective Open Recursion Examples

  22. Design Principles • Non-open as default • Only use open recursion when explicitly intended

  23. Design Principles • Non-open as default • Only use open recursion when explicitly intended • Annotate the method, not the call • Design intent is attached to operation

  24. Do you have to change the language? • Coding guidelines • Never call a public method on this • Hook methods should be protected • Non-hook, protected methods should be final • Not our idea • Suggested by Ruby & Leavens • Used extensively in JDK libraries

  25. Do you have to change the language? • Coding guidelines • Never call a public method on this • Hook methods should be protected • Non-hook, protected methods should be final • Not our idea • Suggested by Ruby & Leavens • Used extensively in JDK libraries • However— • This solution relies on programmer discipline • Language integration provides automated checking

  26. Outline • The Fragile Base Class Problem • Selective Open Recursion • Implementation & Analysis • Future work and Conclusion

  27. Implementation in Java • Extension to Barat compiler • Bokowski & Spiegel • Rewrite calls to non-open methods on this • Call a final method with the implementation for the current class • Available at http://www.archjava.org/

  28. Open Recursion Inference • Analysis to compute open annotations • Method m in class C must be open if: • Method m’ in class C’ <= C calls this.m • Class C’’ <= C’ overrides m • Class C’’ inherits or super-calls C’.m’

  29. Open Recursion Inference • Analysis to compute open annotations • Method m in class C must be open if: • Method m’ in class C’ <= C calls this.m • Class C’’ <= C’ overrides m • Class C’’ inherits or super-calls C’.m’ • Results may be imperfect • Assumes whole program is available • Misses open methods that are not overridden • May mark methods open that should be refactored to be non-open

  30. Experiments • Ran open recursion inference • java.* packages in JDK 1.4.2 • Except java.nio, java.sql (see paper)

  31. Experiments • Ran open recursion inference • java.* packages in JDK 1.4.2 • Except java.nio, java.sql (see paper) • Hypotheses • Open recursion is rarely needed • Selective open recursion enables more optimization

  32. Frequency of Open Recursion • 9897 methods in our portion of stdlib • 246 (2.5%) of methods were inferred open

  33. Frequency of Open Recursion • 9897 methods in our portion of stdlib • 246 (2.5%) of methods were inferred open • Maybe the stdlib doesn’t use inheritance • 1394 of these methods are overridden • Only 18% of these are open Open recursion is rarely needed Thus making it selective may enable substantial information hiding

  34. Frequency of Open Recursion • 9897 methods in our portion of stdlib • 246 (2.5%) of methods were inferred open • Maybe the stdlib doesn’t use inheritance • 1394 of these methods are overridden • Only 18% of these are open • Open recursion is rarely needed • Thus making it selective may enable substantial information hiding

  35. Optimization Potential • 22339 calls in our portion of stdlib • 6852 self-calls • 716 to open methods • Must be dynamically dispatched • 6136 to non-open methods • Can be inlined in our proposal (27% of total calls) • Inlining in Java would require private, final, or whole-program analysis

  36. Outline • The Fragile Base Class Problem • Selective Open Recursion • Implementation & Analysis • Future Work and Conclusion

  37. Future Work: Application to Formal Reasoning • Formalizing as Featherweight Java + module system

  38. Future Work: Application to Formal Reasoning • Formalizing as Featherweight Java + module system • Goal: bisimulation-based proof technique for showing contextual equivalence of modules in the presence of inheritance

  39. Future Work: Application to Formal Reasoning • Formalizing as Featherweight Java + module system • Goal: bisimulation-based proof technique for showing contextual equivalence of modules in the presence of inheritance • Use selective open recursion and other techniques to provide more information hiding • i.e. prove more programs equivalent

  40. Conclusion • Open Recursion complicates reasoning • rarely used in practice • Selective open recursion • retains benefits of open recursion where needed • avoids fragile base class problem • can be efficiently inferred • may allow more optimization and reasoning

  41. class Set { void add(Object elem) { // adds an element } void addAll(Collection c) { foreach (Object o in c) this.add(o) } ... class CountingSet extends Set { private int count; void add(Object elem) { super.add(elem); count++; } void addAll(Collection c){ super.addAll(c); count+=c.size(); } int size() { return count; } // other functions } Open Recursion Calls to this are dispatched to subclass Thus subclass can tell exactly when each method is called

More Related