1 / 9

Progress of Mk.II Pepperpot: Camera, Scintillator and Data Analysis

Progress of Mk.II Pepperpot: Camera, Scintillator and Data Analysis. Simon Jolly Imperial College 24 th January 2007. Mk.II Improvements Over Mk.I. Mechanical improvements (PJS). Larger scintillator/pepperpot screen for better coverage. Scintillator that survives…

Download Presentation

Progress of Mk.II Pepperpot: Camera, Scintillator and Data Analysis

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Progress of Mk.II Pepperpot: Camera, Scintillator and Data Analysis Simon Jolly Imperial College 24th January 2007

  2. Mk.II Improvements Over Mk.I • Mechanical improvements (PJS). • Larger scintillator/pepperpot screen for better coverage. • Scintillator that survives… • Faster camera with lower noise floor. • Improve data analysis. Simon Jolly, Imperial College

  3. Improved Data Analysis • Previous method: average weighted pixel intensities from one spot to produce one point on emittance plot. • New method: use every pixel, ray-tracing from hole centre. • LOTS more data: 25 x 25 x 51 x 51 x 5 matrix (x, y, x’, y’, intensity, for every pixel at every hole location). Data analysis takes longer… • Emittance histogram “regeneration” should not be necessary for Mk.II; not yet tested on expanded Mk.I data (still some teething troubles…). Simon Jolly, Imperial College

  4. New Camera • Current camera (PCO 2000) has some problems: • Software unstable & limited (all data analysis in Matlab). • No signal amplification: need lots of light; can only integrate whole pulses. • Noise floor artifically set at 100 counts: no low light sensitivity. • A number of other things we were unaware of when purchasing camera… • With extra money, could we purchase a faster camera with MCP? • Best option looks like Princeton/PIActon PIMAX 1300: • <10ns gating. • 1340 x 1300 pixel resolution. • 20mm x 20mm pixels (twice as large as PCO). • Range of intensifier tubes. • VERY long delivery times on tubes (high demand from Hamamatsu). Simon Jolly, Imperial College

  5. PI-MAX Intensifier QE Curves Gen III filmless Gen II Gen III PCO Simon Jolly, Imperial College

  6. Intensifier Choices • Gen II gives broadest spectral response but much lower QE. • Gen III filmless is the opposite: narrow, but high QE. • Gen III gives better compromise, but longest delivery times (US Military buying them all…). • How quick do we need to order? • Measure scintillator first? Response looks similar to PCO, plus Ce-doped quartz peaks at 395nm. Simon Jolly, Imperial College

  7. New Scintillator • Quartz has given best results so far: • Virtually no degradation in light output. • Burn marks appear for pepperpot measurement, but don’t affect light intensity. • Too slow for sub-pulse measurements (decay time >100ms). • Looking for single 150mm x 150mm plate from several manufacturers. • Heraeus most promising: can provide undoped and Ce-doped screen. • Ce-doping should improve speed (80ns decay) and light output, but may affect radiation hardness… Simon Jolly, Imperial College

  8. Fast Scintillator • Quartz works for slow measurements (integrating single pulse), but not fast. • Ce-doped quartz screens from Heraeus used in previous GSI/Darmstadt experiment: • http://prola.aps.org/pdf/PRL/v85/i21/p4518_1 • However, doping may affect radiation hardness: doping sites make easy colour centres, reducing scintillation efficiency. • May need fast, undoped scintillator: with new camera, can survive with lower light output. How about Sapphire? Simon Jolly, Imperial College

  9. Alignment • Need better method to measure alignment/orientation and focal plane of scintillator. • Previously used rulers mounted on support: many drawbacks… • Using quartz/sapphire, can etch graticule on beam-side surface of glass. • Use 3 x 3 grid of 3mm squares in centre of plate: • Can now get orientation, scaling and focus. Simon Jolly, Imperial College

More Related