Two-photon physics in elastic electron-nucleon scattering

Download Presentation

Two-photon physics in elastic electron-nucleon scattering

Loading in 2 Seconds...

- 135 Views
- Uploaded on
- Presentation posted in: General

Two-photon physics in elastic electron-nucleon scattering

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

MarcVanderhaeghen

College of William & Mary / JLab

JLab, May 12th 2004

- Introduction : Rosenbluth vs polarization measurements of GE and GM of nucleon
puzzle : different results extracted for GE/GM

- Elastic electron-nucleon scattering beyond the one-photon exchange approximation
- Partonic calculation of two-photon exchange contribution
generalized parton distributions of nucleon

- Results for cross section and polarization transfer
- SSA in elastic electron-nucleon scattering
P.A.M. Guichon, M.Vdh PRL91, 142303 (2003)

Y.C. Chen, A.Afanasev, S. Brodsky, C. Carlson, M.Vdh hep-ph/0403058

M. Gorchtein, P.A.M. Guichon, M. Vdh hep-ph/0404206

B. Pasquini, M. Vdh in progress

Rosenbluthseparationmethod

One-photonexchange elastic electron-nucleon crosssection

Method : at fixed Q2, vary angle q (or equivalently e)

and plot reduced cross section

versus e

One-photon theorist’s view

Polarization transfer method

Method : measure ratio of sideways ( ) to

longitudinal ( ) recoil polarization of proton

(absolute normalization drops out !)

in one-photon exchange approximation :

SLAC

Rosenbluth data

Jlab/Hall A Polarization data

Jonesetal. (2000)

Gayouetal. (2002)

Twomethods, twodifferentresults !

Speculation : missing radiative corrections

Speculation : there are radiative corrections to Rosenbluth experiments that are important and are not included

missing correction : linear in e, not strongly Q2 dependent

Q2 = 6 GeV2

GE term is proportionally smaller at large Q2

effect more visible at large Q2

if both FF scale in same way

Radiative correction diagrams

bremsstrahlung

vertex corrections

2 photon exchange box diagrams

Comments on radiative corrections

- Radiative corrections at electron side,
well understood and taken care of

- Soft bremsstrahlung
involves long-wavelength photons

compositeness of nucleon only enters through

on-shell form factors

- Box diagrams involve photons of all wavelengths
long wavelength (soft photon) part is included in radiative correction (IR divergence is cancelled with electron proton bremsstrahlung interference)

short wavelength contributions :

not done in “old” days

Status of radiative corrections

N

- Tsai (1961), Mo & Tsai (1968)
box diagram calculated usingonly nucleon intermediate stateandusing q1¼ 0 or q2¼ 0 in both numerator and denominator (calculate 3-point function)-> gives correct IR divergent terms

- Maximon & Tjon (2000)
same as above, but make the above approximation only in numerator (calculate 4-point function)

+ use on-shell nucleon form factors in loop integral

- Blunden, Melnitchouk, Tjon (2003)
further improvement by keeping the full numerator

Kinematical invariants :

(me = 0)

equivalently, introduce

Observables including two-photon exchange

Real parts of two-photon amplitudes

Phenomenological analysis

2-photon exchange is a candidate to explain the discrepancy between both experimental methods

Guichon, Vdh (2003)

“handbag”

“cat’s ears”

- maincontributionatlargeQ2:
handbagdiagrams (one active quark)

- to reproduce the IR divergent contribution at nucleon correctly (i.e. to satisfy the Low Energy Theorem)
need cat’s ears diagrams (two active quarks)

Calculation of hard scattering amplitude

hard scattering amplitude

electron helicity

quark helicity

Calculation for em -> em can be found in literature

(e.g. van Nieuwenhuizen (1971) ), which we verified explicitly

IR divergences of boxes must disappear or cancel in the end,

regularize through photon mass l

Separation soft-hard parts in electron-quark box

Follow the decomposition of Grammer and Yennie (1973) :

soft part calculated as 3-point function

reproduces Low Energy Theorem

kinematics partonic subprocess :

Calculation of soft part at nucleon level

LET : sum of soft contributions from the partonic calculation has to match the soft contributions at nucleonic level

To satisfy the LET, one has to include the

soft-photon contributions from the cats’ ears diagrams

Pictorially :

soft

soft

soft

soft

Calculation of bremsstrahlung

IR finite

soft part of electron-nucleon box

bremsstrahlung contribution : Maximon, Tjon (2000)

Experimentalists do corrections according to Mo-Tsai

relative to Mo-Tsai, the above formula gives

a correction factor (1 + p a) + terms of size 0.001

Convolution with GPDs

result for handbag amplitude (large Q2 )

work in frame q+ = 0, nm is a Sudakov vector ( n2 = 0, n . P = 1 )

handbag amplitude depends on GPD(x, x = 0, Q2),

which also appear in other wide angle scattering processes (e.g. WACS)

Hard part to invariant amplitudes

for elastic eN scattering

GPD integrals

“magnetic” GPD

“electric” GPD

“axial” GPD

Observables including two-photon exchange

in terms of A, B, C (real parts)

Model for GPDs at large Q2

use gaussian-valence model : Radyushkin (1998), Diehl et al. (1999)

s = 0.8 GeV2

Forward parton distributions at m2 = 1 GeV2

MRST2002 NNLO

Leader, Sidorov, Stamenov (2002)

Test of GPDs models : form factors

gaussian valence model

non-linear Regge model

Form factors used as input in calculation

magnetic proton form factor

Brash et al. (2002)

electric proton form factor :

GE / GM of proton fixed from polarization dataGayou et al. (2002)

Crosssection :

with

1g + 2g (hard+soft)

1 g

1g + 2g (hard)

Crosssection :

with

1 g

1g + 2g (non-linear Regge model )

1g + 2g(gaussian valence model )

Direct test of real part of 2g amplitude

data figure from Arrington (2003)

Polarization transfer observables

1g + 2g

1g

2 g correction

on is small

2 g correction on

can be tested at small e !

spin of beam OR target NORMAL to scattering plane

on-shell intermediate state (MX = W)

lepton

hadron

Integrand : beam normal spin asymmetry

Ee = 0.855 GeV

MAID

Beam normal spin asymmetry

(elastic)

MAMI data (prelim.)

Target normal spin asymmetry

general formula, of order e2

involves the imaginary part of two-photon exchange amplitudes

Target normal spin asymmetry : partonic calculation

two-photon electron-quark amplitude

“magnetic” GPD

“electric” GPD

Target normal spin asymmetry : PROTON results

%

GM term

GPD prediction

elastic

GE term

JLab proposals : could reach 0.1% precision

Target normal spin asymmetry : NEUTRON results

GE term

%

elastic

GPD prediction

GM term

sizeable asymmetry on neutron :

no cancellation effect as on proton

Elastic electron-nucleon amplitudes

with electron helicity flip

In Born approximation :

Elastic electron-quark amplitudes

with electron helicity flip

lepton mass

new amplitude

Beam normal spin asymmetry : partonic calculation

“magnetic” GPD

“electric” GPD

“magnetic” GPD

“electric” GPD

Beam normal spin asymmetry : results

Results of GPD calculation

Note : elastic contribution to Bn is negligibly small

Present PV experimental set-ups (0.1 ppm precision) : opportunity to measure this asymmetry

- Developed the formalism to describe elastic electron-nucleon scattering beyond the one-photon exchange approximation
- Performed a partonic calculation of two-photon exchange contribution in terms ofgeneralized parton distributions of nucleon (handbag calculation)
- Able to resolve existing discrepancy between Rosenbluth and polarization transfer observables quantitatively
- SSA in elastic electron-nucleon scattering :
promising observables to access doubly (spacelike) virtual Compton scattering