1 / 15

The Art of Jumping Rope

The Art of Jumping Rope. By: Michael L., Andrew S., Andy …. Introduction.

airlia
Download Presentation

The Art of Jumping Rope

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. The Art of Jumping Rope By: Michael L., Andrew S., Andy …

  2. Introduction • In our Minute to Win It lab, we measured how many times a person could make a full rotation w/ a jump rope in 1 min. Our variables were blocked by gender, whether or not the person ate breakfast and whether or not the person played any sports. • Some outliers were expected but not many came up and only in specific situations • Skill w/ jump rope also a key factor

  3. Quantitative Data -slightly right skewed -spread 19-166

  4. Quant. Data Cont. IQR – 89 Mean – 86.42 Median – 79 Min – 19 Max – 166

  5. Normal Prob. Plot -Data follows the line across, therefore it is normal

  6. Gender Display -Female center is smaller than male center (78 and 83.5) -Spreads very similar (126F, 124M) -The only outlier would be the 166 RPM in the girls plot, exceeding everyone else -Gender doesn’t seem to change too much

  7. Sports Display -Spread much higher for people who play sports -Centers (63.5N) and (92Y) are also far apart showing the difference of playing sports -Positive influence of playing sports on jump roping -One outlier for the non-sport people (exceeding expectations)

  8. Sep. Partner Data -IQR’s (72M) and (107.25A) -Spread is very close as well -Centers are the main difference (71M) (119.5A) -Some significant difference in either the test taker or the instructor

  9. Two-Way Table -This table is very complicated

  10. Marginal Distributions Sports 38.7% 61.3%

  11. Marginal Distr. Breakfast 32.3% 67.7%

  12. Conditional Distr.

  13. Indep. Categorical Data Sports v. Breakfast: -P(AПB)= P(A)x P(B) (overlap/total) -(A)= no sports (B)= yes breakfast -7/31= (12/31)x(21/31) -.226= .2622 -2nd test -(A)= yes sports (B)= no breakfast -5/31= 19/31 x 10/31 -.1613= .1977 Both roughly the same gap between answers showing consistently in the testing. The numbers aren’t close enough together to call them independent, thus making them two dependent variables.

  14. Conclusion -All in all the test came out a success -Trends showed that people who ate breakfast and played sports were more successful with their jump roping. It was only a slight win however.

  15. Possible Error or Bias? -Subconsciously giving friend a few extra jumps -Losing count (even w/ tallying the paper) -Not starting the timer soon enough -Inability to keep up w/ jumper’s pace

More Related