1 / 26

Recent results from SPD beam test D. Elia, R. Santoro INFN Bari ALICE Collaboration - SPD Group

Recent results from SPD beam test D. Elia, R. Santoro INFN Bari ALICE Collaboration - SPD Group. Half stave. Pb-Target. Mini bus 1. beam. Middle plane. Mini bus 0. Table. MWPC. Scintillators. Quartz. Table: 150 cm. SPD beam test in 2003 (I).

aine
Download Presentation

Recent results from SPD beam test D. Elia, R. Santoro INFN Bari ALICE Collaboration - SPD Group

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Recent results from SPD beam test D. Elia, R. Santoro INFN Bari ALICE Collaboration - SPD Group ALICE Offline Week - June 2004

  2. Half stave Pb-Target Mini bus 1 beam Middle plane Mini bus 0 Table MWPC Scintillators Quartz Table: 150 cm SPD beam test in 2003 (I) • 158 A GeV/c In beam (104 ions/spill, 15 days) 4 mm thick Pb target • 3 days with 120 GeV/c proton/pion beam ALICE Offline Week - June 2004

  3. SPD beam test in 2003 (II) • Target: 4 mm Pb • Trigger: quartz counter (beam) + 2 cm x 2 cm scintillator (interactions) • Mini bus 0, 1: 2 single chips/mini bus mounted in crossed way • Middle plane: single chip under study • Half-stave: read out through MCM including optical module • 2.8 GB of data collected Half-stave Middle plane Mini bus 0 Mini bus 1 Target ALICE Offline Week - June 2004

  4. SPD beam test in 2003 (III) • Used for this analysis: proton/pion beam data (detailed understanding of detector behaviour) ALICE Offline Week - June 2004

  5. 256 rows 425 mm 50 mm 32 columns SPD beam test in 2003 (III) Minibus 1 Test chip Minibus 0 • Main studies: - alignments, residuals and resolution - clusteranalysis - detection efficiency ALICE Offline Week - June 2004

  6. SPD beam test in 2003 (III) Minibus 1 Test chip Minibus 0 • Available samples: - focussed and wide beam data - full scan of threshold settings - tilt angle scan (inclined tracks) ALICE Offline Week - June 2004

  7. All cluster tupes: rms(x) = 117 mm s(y) = 14.9 mm Alignments • Alignment of the minibuses and track reconstruction • Fine tuning of the alignment for the test plane: • - track prediction residuals centering ALICE Offline Week - June 2004

  8. Single pixel-clusters: rms(x) = 121 mm s(y) = 14.9 mm Double-pixel clusters: s(x) = 12.6 mm s(y) = 13.6 mm Residuals and resolution (I) ALICE Offline Week - June 2004

  9. Residuals and resolution (II) Residuals for single pixel clusters: rms(x) = 121 mm s(y) = 14.9 mm @ VTH = 200 Spatial precision of the telescope (simulation): stelescope 10 mm spixel(x) = 121 mmspixel(y) = 11 mm ALICE Offline Week - June 2004

  10. Impacts vs cluster size Single-pixel cluster Double-x-pixel cluster Double-y-pixel cluster ALICE Offline Week - June 2004

  11. Double-x-pixel cluster X-impacts vs cluster size Single-pixel cluster @ VTH = 200 ALICE Offline Week - June 2004

  12. X-impacts vs cluster size s = 15 mm @ VTH = 200 ALICE Offline Week - June 2004

  13. Y-impacts vs cluster size Single-pixel cluster Double-y-pixel cluster ALICE Offline Week - June 2004

  14. @ VTH=214 s(y) = 13.8 mm @ VTH=200 s(y) = 14.9 mm @ VTH=120 s(y) = 17.9 mm @ VTH=80 s(y) = 16.6 mm Residuals vs threshold (I) Single-pixel clusters ALICE Offline Week - June 2004

  15. @ VTH=214 s(y) = 15.8 mm @ VTH=200 s(y) = 13.6 mm @ VTH=120 s(y) = 14.1 mm @ VTH=80 s(y) = 21.0 mm Residuals vs threshold (II) Double-y-pixel clusters ALICE Offline Week - June 2004

  16. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 9 10 8 12 11 13 Cluster type studies (I) Following classification implemented: 14 = all other types ALICE Offline Week - June 2004

  17. 1 2 3 4 5 7 8 Cluster type studies (II) VTH = 200 ALICE Offline Week - June 2004

  18. 1 2 3 4 5 7 9 10 8 Cluster type studies (III) ALICE Offline Week - June 2004

  19. 6 12 11 13 Cluster type studies (III) ALICE Offline Week - June 2004

  20. Cluster type studies (IV) VTH=214 VTH=200 ALICE Offline Week - June 2004

  21. 1 2 3 4 5 7 8 Cluster type studies (V) VTH = 214 ALICE Offline Week - June 2004

  22. Cluster type studies (VI) VTH=200 VTH=180 ALICE Offline Week - June 2004

  23. Cluster type studies (VII) VTH=140 VTH=120 ALICE Offline Week - June 2004

  24. Cluster size vs threshold (I) @ VTH=214 @ VTH=200 @ VTH=160 @ VTH=90 ALICE Offline Week - June 2004

  25. Cluster size vs threshold (II) ALICE Offline Week - June 2004

  26. Threshold scan study: Efficiency study • Event selection: • - 1 cluster on each of the tracking planes • - track crossing the test plane (acceptance limits) • @ VTH>150: • - efficiency  99.9% ALICE Offline Week - June 2004

More Related