1 / 14

MYRRHA Injector at UCL

MYRRHA Injector at UCL. Dirk Vandeplassche Luis Medeiros Romão SCK  CEN. MAX International Design Review. Brussels, 12-13 November 2012. Introduction: origin & goal. MYRRHA accelerator risk evaluation → list of critical elements : RFQ in CW mode (4-vane or 4-rod) .. .

aine
Download Presentation

MYRRHA Injector at UCL

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. MYRRHA Injectorat UCL Dirk Vandeplassche Luis Medeiros Romão SCKCEN MAX International Design Review Brussels, 12-13 November 2012 Dirk Vandeplassche, MAX International Design Review, Brussels, 12-13 November, 2012

  2. Introduction: origin & goal Dirk Vandeplassche, MAX International Design Review, Brussels, 12-13 November, 2012 • MYRRHA acceleratorriskevaluation → list of criticalelements: • RFQ in CW mode (4-vane or 4-rod) • ... • OECD review (MIRT, 2009) → request to SCK•CEN of showing relevant acceleratoractivity • need for reliability test platform • need for innovation platform

  3. Test platformoverview to belocatedat the Centre de Ressources du Cyclotron, UCL Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium Dirk Vandeplassche, MAX International Design Review, Brussels, 12-13 November, 2012

  4. Components RFQ@UCL isalso an "accelerator consortium test platform" Dirk Vandeplassche, MAX International Design Review, Brussels, 12-13 November, 2012 • design & construction modalities • collaborative • MAX Collaboration • research institutes: IPNO, LPSC, IAP, CRC, Soleil • industries: Pantechnik, NTG, Cosylab, IBA, ... • research consultants (MoU): Spiral2, CERN, ... • private consultants: Linac Dynamics, ... • strong MAX involvement: WP1 and WP2 partners • CNRS • CEA • IAP • KULAK • SCK•CEN

  5. Components Dirk Vandeplassche, MAX International Design Review, Brussels, 12-13 November, 2012 ECR proton source ← Pantechnik (Bayeux, France)

  6. Components Dirk Vandeplassche, MAX International Design Review, Brussels, 12-13 November, 2012 LEBT ← IPNO, benchmarking & erroranalysis by Linac Dynamics, realisation and commissioning by LPSC, controls by Cosylab

  7. Benchmarking Dirk Vandeplassche, MAX International Design Review, Brussels, 12-13 November, 2012

  8. Components Dirk Vandeplassche, MAX International Design Review, Brussels, 12-13 November, 2012 RFQ ← IAP Frankfurt, benchmarking (3D fields) by KULAK and Linac Dynamics, manufacturing by NTG, tuningat IAP

  9. Benchmarking Dirk Vandeplassche, MAX International Design Review, Brussels, 12-13 November, 2012

  10. Components Dirk Vandeplassche, MAX International Design Review, Brussels, 12-13 November, 2012 • Diagnostics: lowenergy, highcurrent • beamcurrent • interceptive: FC • non-interceptive: BCT • beam position • beam profiles • emittances • longitudinal bunchproperties • likely to bebased on existing items • Spiral2 • Linac4

  11. Components Dirk Vandeplassche, MAX International Design Review, Brussels, 12-13 November, 2012 • Power RF for RFQ: 176.1 MHz, 160 kW CW • TH781 tetrodebased final amplifier • SS amplifier, Soleil technology • efficiency • modularity for reliability

  12. Components Dirk Vandeplassche, MAX International Design Review, Brussels, 12-13 November, 2012 • Controls • main target: berepresentative of full-size system • distant • 3-tier • EPICS • lowlevelwithPLC's (slow) + FPGA cards in crates (fast) • willinclude timing • Cosylab for architecture and realisation • test platform! • LLRF • discussion with IPNO ongoing • looking for elegantintegration

  13. Components Dirk Vandeplassche, MAX International Design Review, Brussels, 12-13 November, 2012 • Services: • 750 kVA • profitingfrom CRC infrastructure • elec cabinets withremote diagnostics and controls • PLC-controlledcooling system • deionized water loop • chilled and temperaturestabilizeddeinonized water loop • air coolingloop • integratedindustrialprocurement • test case for integration in EPICS system

  14. Conclusion Dirk Vandeplassche, MAX International Design Review, Brussels, 12-13 November, 2012 • setup at UCL/CRC has a highpotential as a test platform: • 4-rod CW RFQ evaluation • beamcharacterisation • long reliabilityruns • innovation • target date "first beam end of 2014" isstillachievable • possible extension with CH cavities (IAP) • SC-CH?

More Related