1 / 8

CCM Reorganization

CCM Reorganization. Comment resolution for CCM Text in TGi D3.0 Paul A. Lambert, Russ Housley, Onno Letanche, Dorothy Stanley. Comment Review. Addressing section 8.3.4 8.3.4 contained numerous errors introduce in the editing process 

ailis
Download Presentation

CCM Reorganization

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. CCM Reorganization Comment resolution for CCM Text in TGi D3.0 Paul A. Lambert, Russ Housley, Onno Letanche, Dorothy Stanley Paul Lambert, Airgo Networks

  2. Comment Review • Addressing section 8.3.4 • 8.3.4 contained numerous errors introduce in the editing process  • On review, it was determined that the section could be made more precise and concise my remove the descriptions of CCM and directly referencing the NIST CCM specification. Paul Lambert, Airgo Networks

  3. 11-03-118r1-I Alterative Text for TGi Clause 8.3.4 • Resolves Comments 45,1299,1646,240,1308,576,577,1222,1568,1647,148,1859,972,578,830,47,583,873,976,149,150,163, 164,165,197,198,199,209,288,298,290,1198,1200,1357,1569,1649,1650,973,974,975,1254,1356,1483,1523,1648,1858,1893,46,151,152,153,154,166,167,168,169,185,200,201,202,203,210,211,212,213,291,292,293,294,579,581,582, 1708,1724, 1277 and others Paul Lambert, Airgo Networks

  4. Comment Resolution – Recommend Rejection • 264 – Reject suggestion to make extended IV bit reserved. Retain use of extended IV • 48 – Reject suggestion to combine dot11CcmpReceiveAddress and a dot11CcmpTransmitAddress into single state element dot11CcmpPartnerAddress. Still confusing • 1952 – Rejected. Comment is incorrect, A3 and A4 are already covered by the MIC Paul Lambert, Airgo Networks

  5. Impacts on additional sections • 1222 – Add J. Johanssen’s reference to the bibliography Paul Lambert, Airgo Networks

  6. Temporarily Deferred • MIB Variable work - Comments 585,597,588,589,590,591,593,594,595,596,597,598, • MPDU/MSDU Comments 116,125,808,1263,1334 Paul Lambert, Airgo Networks

  7. Already Addressed • 580, 600 – Rejected. IV sequence counter processing applies to BC/MC traffic Paul Lambert, Airgo Networks

  8. Motion • Instruct editor to replace clause 8.3.4 in TGi D3.0 with the text in 11-03-118r0. Paul Lambert, Airgo Networks

More Related