1 / 19

# Land Use in Monocentric City - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Land Use in Monocentric City. Chapter 8 O’Sullivan. What does the city look like?. We have lots of activity downtown. Less activity as we go further away. Why is that?. Distance. Answers. Transportation technologies lead to nodes from which we ship items.

I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.

## PowerPoint Slideshow about ' Land Use in Monocentric City' - aiko

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript

### Land Use in Monocentric City

Chapter 8

O’Sullivan

• We have lots of activity downtown.

• Less activity as we go further away.

• Why is that?

Distance

• Transportation technologies lead to nodes from which we ship items.

• Scale economies imply that we are likely to see clustering around activities that are subject to economies of scale.

• There are informational and shopping externalities.

• The fundamental story is one that we’ve seen before.

• Firms maximize profits. The profits come from a function that looks like this:

•  = Rev - Costs - transportation costs - rent

• If there is perfect competition,  = 0.

• So:

• 0 = Rev - Costs - transportation costs - rent

• rent = Rev. - Costs - tXu

• where X is what is shipped, t is the cost per unit to ship it, and u is the distance shipped.

• So:

• Rent is inversely related to distance.

• Tall buildings downtown.

• Higher density downtown

• People commuting to the downtown, or:

Distance

• What is efficient?

Answer -- Since production is usually taken as fixed, the efficient allocation minimizes transportation costs. Those with the highest transportation costs are locating the closest, so the allocation is efficient.

Households don’t maximize profits, so let’s look, first, at their budgets, but then look at their utility.

Households, in this model, eat chicken, rent housing, and commute to work. So:

Income = Chick. Exp. + House Exp. + trav.

y = 1 * c + p * h + t*u

y = 1 * c + p * h + t*u

where c = pounds of chicken at \$1/pound

h = housing, at price p

u = distance commuting at price t/mile

As the household moves further away from downtown, what MUST change?

A> Commuting cost .

Then what?

Then what?

• Does the price of chicken change?

• OK, transportation costs go up by \$t. So, the price of housing must fall in order to make up for the transportation costs.

• If tu increases, ph must decrease, or else income rises.

• So if we move 1 mile further, transportation cost increases by \$t. Thus:

• t = - h  p, or:

•  p = -t / h.

• Let’s look at a spreadsheet (EXCEL).

•  p = -t / h.

• This is a straight line, just like we saw before.

• What kinds of substitutions might we see?

• A picture!

• Suppose Clyde takes home \$2,000 per month. Clyde lives on chicken and housing, and commutes to work.

• Chicken costs \$1/pound.

• Housing costs \$0.50/sq. ft.

• Commuting costs \$100.

• All are per month.

1900

Chicken

1400

3800

1000

Housing

Income net of commuting (\$20 )

1900

1880

Housing price MUST fall so

that he’s as well off as before.

Chicken

1400

3760

3800

1000

Housing

• People must stay on same indifference curve!

• As price of housing falls, people substitute away from chicken. Utility rises.

• To keep utility the same, price of housing is bid up a little more than the transportation costs would indicate. This makes it convex.

• Let’s compare the rich and the poor.

• Look at the equation:

•  p = -t / h.

What changes between the rich and the poor?

A> The rich buy more h than the poor. So, the denominator of the equation is bigger. The price of housing must fall LESS per square foot per mile for the rich than for the poor.

• Transp. is relatively important for poor  steep

• Transp. is relatively less important for rich  shallow

\$/sq.ft.

Poor

Rich

Distance

• Poor in central city, rich further out. Why?

• Look at EXCEL spreadsheet and discuss.

• Next time:

• Segregation

Oddly, the poor “outbid” the rich for central city land. Does this make sense